Extent of linkage disequilibrium in large-breed dogs: Chromosomal and breed variation

Joshua A Stern, Stephen N. White, Kathryn M. Meurs

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations


The aim of this study was to better define the extent of linkage disequilibrium (LD) in populations of large-breed dogs and its variation by breed and chromosomal region. Understanding the extent of LD is a crucial component for successful utilization of genome-wide association studies and allows researchers to better define regions of interest and target candidate genes. Twenty-four Golden Retriever dogs, 28 Rottweiler dogs, and 24 Newfoundland dogs were genotyped for single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) data using a high-density SNP array. LD was calculated for all autosomes using Haploview. Decay of the squared correlation coefficient (r 2) was plotted on a per-breed and per-chromosome basis as well as in a genome-wide fashion. The point of 50 % decay of r 2 was used to estimate the difference in extent of LD between breeds. Extent of LD was significantly shorter for Newfoundland dogs based upon 50 % decay of r 2 data at a mean of 344 kb compared to Golden Retriever and Rottweiler dogs at 715 and 834 kb, respectively (P < 0.0001). Notable differences in LD by chromosome were present within each breed and not strictly related to the length of the corresponding chromosome. Extent of LD is breed and chromosome dependent. To our knowledge, this is the first report of SNP-based LD for Newfoundland dogs, the first report based on genome-wide SNPs for Rottweilers, and an almost tenfold improvement in marker density over previous genome-wide studies of LD in Golden Retrievers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)409-415
Number of pages7
JournalMammalian Genome
Issue number9-10
StatePublished - Oct 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Genetics


Dive into the research topics of 'Extent of linkage disequilibrium in large-breed dogs: Chromosomal and breed variation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this