Experimental and clinical evaluation of transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteronephrectomy in dogs

Philipp Mayhew, Stephen J. Mehler, Kelli N. Mayhew, Michele A Steffey, William T Culp

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To report a surgical technique for transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteronephrectomy (TLU) in dogs and describe complications and outcome in a cohort of dogs. Study Design: Experimental study and case series. Animals: Purpose-bred research dogs (n=3) and canine clinical cases (9). Methods: In 11 of 12 dogs, a 3 port laparoscopic approach was used and in 1 dog a 4-port approach was used. Incision through the retroperitoneal space was followed by early dissection of the ureter to aid retraction and elevation of the renal hilus. Dissection was performed principally by use of a vessel-sealing device. Ligation of the renal hilar vessels was accomplished using laparoscopic hemoclips. Experimental dogs were euthanatized and necropsied. Results: In 3 experimental dogs, no intraoperative complications occurred and conversion to an open approach was unnecessary. Of 9 clinical cases, conversion to an open approach was required in 2 dogs, because of severe hydroureter obscuring observation in 1, and uncontrollable retroperitoneal hemorrhage in the other dog. In 1 dog hemorrhage from the renal capsule and renal vein was controlled laparoscopically. No other major complications occurred. All dogs were discharged. Conclusions: Transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteronephrectomy is feasible in dogs although conversion to an open approach should be considered when uncontrollable hemorrhage is encountered or the view is obscured by anatomic alteration.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)565-571
Number of pages7
JournalVeterinary Surgery
Volume42
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2013

Fingerprint

Dogs
dogs
kidneys
hemorrhage
Hemorrhage
Kidney
Dissection
Retroperitoneal Space
Renal Veins
ureter
Intraoperative Complications
Ureter
Capsules
Ligation
Canidae
Research Design
Observation
surgery
experimental design
Equipment and Supplies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Experimental and clinical evaluation of transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteronephrectomy in dogs. / Mayhew, Philipp; Mehler, Stephen J.; Mayhew, Kelli N.; Steffey, Michele A; Culp, William T.

In: Veterinary Surgery, Vol. 42, No. 5, 06.2013, p. 565-571.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cca91b5b321a4e7b9f6cb790ffeab529,
title = "Experimental and clinical evaluation of transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteronephrectomy in dogs",
abstract = "Objective: To report a surgical technique for transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteronephrectomy (TLU) in dogs and describe complications and outcome in a cohort of dogs. Study Design: Experimental study and case series. Animals: Purpose-bred research dogs (n=3) and canine clinical cases (9). Methods: In 11 of 12 dogs, a 3 port laparoscopic approach was used and in 1 dog a 4-port approach was used. Incision through the retroperitoneal space was followed by early dissection of the ureter to aid retraction and elevation of the renal hilus. Dissection was performed principally by use of a vessel-sealing device. Ligation of the renal hilar vessels was accomplished using laparoscopic hemoclips. Experimental dogs were euthanatized and necropsied. Results: In 3 experimental dogs, no intraoperative complications occurred and conversion to an open approach was unnecessary. Of 9 clinical cases, conversion to an open approach was required in 2 dogs, because of severe hydroureter obscuring observation in 1, and uncontrollable retroperitoneal hemorrhage in the other dog. In 1 dog hemorrhage from the renal capsule and renal vein was controlled laparoscopically. No other major complications occurred. All dogs were discharged. Conclusions: Transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteronephrectomy is feasible in dogs although conversion to an open approach should be considered when uncontrollable hemorrhage is encountered or the view is obscured by anatomic alteration.",
author = "Philipp Mayhew and Mehler, {Stephen J.} and Mayhew, {Kelli N.} and Steffey, {Michele A} and Culp, {William T}",
year = "2013",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.01092.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "565--571",
journal = "Veterinary Surgery",
issn = "0161-3499",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Experimental and clinical evaluation of transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteronephrectomy in dogs

AU - Mayhew, Philipp

AU - Mehler, Stephen J.

AU - Mayhew, Kelli N.

AU - Steffey, Michele A

AU - Culp, William T

PY - 2013/6

Y1 - 2013/6

N2 - Objective: To report a surgical technique for transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteronephrectomy (TLU) in dogs and describe complications and outcome in a cohort of dogs. Study Design: Experimental study and case series. Animals: Purpose-bred research dogs (n=3) and canine clinical cases (9). Methods: In 11 of 12 dogs, a 3 port laparoscopic approach was used and in 1 dog a 4-port approach was used. Incision through the retroperitoneal space was followed by early dissection of the ureter to aid retraction and elevation of the renal hilus. Dissection was performed principally by use of a vessel-sealing device. Ligation of the renal hilar vessels was accomplished using laparoscopic hemoclips. Experimental dogs were euthanatized and necropsied. Results: In 3 experimental dogs, no intraoperative complications occurred and conversion to an open approach was unnecessary. Of 9 clinical cases, conversion to an open approach was required in 2 dogs, because of severe hydroureter obscuring observation in 1, and uncontrollable retroperitoneal hemorrhage in the other dog. In 1 dog hemorrhage from the renal capsule and renal vein was controlled laparoscopically. No other major complications occurred. All dogs were discharged. Conclusions: Transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteronephrectomy is feasible in dogs although conversion to an open approach should be considered when uncontrollable hemorrhage is encountered or the view is obscured by anatomic alteration.

AB - Objective: To report a surgical technique for transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteronephrectomy (TLU) in dogs and describe complications and outcome in a cohort of dogs. Study Design: Experimental study and case series. Animals: Purpose-bred research dogs (n=3) and canine clinical cases (9). Methods: In 11 of 12 dogs, a 3 port laparoscopic approach was used and in 1 dog a 4-port approach was used. Incision through the retroperitoneal space was followed by early dissection of the ureter to aid retraction and elevation of the renal hilus. Dissection was performed principally by use of a vessel-sealing device. Ligation of the renal hilar vessels was accomplished using laparoscopic hemoclips. Experimental dogs were euthanatized and necropsied. Results: In 3 experimental dogs, no intraoperative complications occurred and conversion to an open approach was unnecessary. Of 9 clinical cases, conversion to an open approach was required in 2 dogs, because of severe hydroureter obscuring observation in 1, and uncontrollable retroperitoneal hemorrhage in the other dog. In 1 dog hemorrhage from the renal capsule and renal vein was controlled laparoscopically. No other major complications occurred. All dogs were discharged. Conclusions: Transperitoneal laparoscopic ureteronephrectomy is feasible in dogs although conversion to an open approach should be considered when uncontrollable hemorrhage is encountered or the view is obscured by anatomic alteration.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879796653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84879796653&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.01092.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1532-950X.2013.01092.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 23373697

AN - SCOPUS:84879796653

VL - 42

SP - 565

EP - 571

JO - Veterinary Surgery

JF - Veterinary Surgery

SN - 0161-3499

IS - 5

ER -