Examining relationships between child skills and potential key components of an evidence-based practice in ASD

Aubyn Stahmer, Jessica Suhrheinrich, Scott Roesch, Sasha M. Zeedyk, Tiffany Wang, Neilson Chan, Hyon Soo Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: Research in autism spectrum disorders (ASD)has identified a need to understand key components of complex evidence-based practices (EBP). One approach involves examining the relationship between component use and child behavior. Aims: This study provides initial evidence for identifying key components in a specific EBP, Pivotal Response Training (PRT). We examined which components were related to child response and evaluated relationships between provider characteristics, child characteristics and component intensity. Methods: Trained coders reviewed archival videos (n = 278)for PRT fidelity and child behavior. We completed multi-level regression and latent profile analysis to examine relationships between intensity of individual or combinations of PRT components and child behavior, and moderators of component use. Results: Analyses indicated differential relationships between specific components and child behaviors which may support methods of altering intensity of components to individualize intervention. Profile analysis suggested relatively intensive use of most PRT components, especially antecedent strategies, may maximize child responsivity. Providers with postgraduate education trended toward higher intensity component use. Child characteristics did not moderate use. Implications: Careful examination of key components of ASD interventions may helps clarify the mechanisms of action. Recommendations specific to PRT implementation and use of the methodology for other interventions are discussed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalResearch in Developmental Disabilities
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2019

Fingerprint

Evidence-Based Practice
Child Behavior
Education
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Research

Keywords

  • Autism spectrum disorder
  • Empirically-based practice
  • Intervention components
  • Key components

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

Examining relationships between child skills and potential key components of an evidence-based practice in ASD. / Stahmer, Aubyn; Suhrheinrich, Jessica; Roesch, Scott; Zeedyk, Sasha M.; Wang, Tiffany; Chan, Neilson; Lee, Hyon Soo.

In: Research in Developmental Disabilities, 01.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stahmer, Aubyn ; Suhrheinrich, Jessica ; Roesch, Scott ; Zeedyk, Sasha M. ; Wang, Tiffany ; Chan, Neilson ; Lee, Hyon Soo. / Examining relationships between child skills and potential key components of an evidence-based practice in ASD. In: Research in Developmental Disabilities. 2019.
@article{e39b2fff74384a3dbca99fe033166783,
title = "Examining relationships between child skills and potential key components of an evidence-based practice in ASD",
abstract = "Background: Research in autism spectrum disorders (ASD)has identified a need to understand key components of complex evidence-based practices (EBP). One approach involves examining the relationship between component use and child behavior. Aims: This study provides initial evidence for identifying key components in a specific EBP, Pivotal Response Training (PRT). We examined which components were related to child response and evaluated relationships between provider characteristics, child characteristics and component intensity. Methods: Trained coders reviewed archival videos (n = 278)for PRT fidelity and child behavior. We completed multi-level regression and latent profile analysis to examine relationships between intensity of individual or combinations of PRT components and child behavior, and moderators of component use. Results: Analyses indicated differential relationships between specific components and child behaviors which may support methods of altering intensity of components to individualize intervention. Profile analysis suggested relatively intensive use of most PRT components, especially antecedent strategies, may maximize child responsivity. Providers with postgraduate education trended toward higher intensity component use. Child characteristics did not moderate use. Implications: Careful examination of key components of ASD interventions may helps clarify the mechanisms of action. Recommendations specific to PRT implementation and use of the methodology for other interventions are discussed.",
keywords = "Autism spectrum disorder, Empirically-based practice, Intervention components, Key components",
author = "Aubyn Stahmer and Jessica Suhrheinrich and Scott Roesch and Zeedyk, {Sasha M.} and Tiffany Wang and Neilson Chan and Lee, {Hyon Soo}",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ridd.2019.04.003",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Research in Developmental Disabilities",
issn = "0891-4222",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Examining relationships between child skills and potential key components of an evidence-based practice in ASD

AU - Stahmer, Aubyn

AU - Suhrheinrich, Jessica

AU - Roesch, Scott

AU - Zeedyk, Sasha M.

AU - Wang, Tiffany

AU - Chan, Neilson

AU - Lee, Hyon Soo

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Background: Research in autism spectrum disorders (ASD)has identified a need to understand key components of complex evidence-based practices (EBP). One approach involves examining the relationship between component use and child behavior. Aims: This study provides initial evidence for identifying key components in a specific EBP, Pivotal Response Training (PRT). We examined which components were related to child response and evaluated relationships between provider characteristics, child characteristics and component intensity. Methods: Trained coders reviewed archival videos (n = 278)for PRT fidelity and child behavior. We completed multi-level regression and latent profile analysis to examine relationships between intensity of individual or combinations of PRT components and child behavior, and moderators of component use. Results: Analyses indicated differential relationships between specific components and child behaviors which may support methods of altering intensity of components to individualize intervention. Profile analysis suggested relatively intensive use of most PRT components, especially antecedent strategies, may maximize child responsivity. Providers with postgraduate education trended toward higher intensity component use. Child characteristics did not moderate use. Implications: Careful examination of key components of ASD interventions may helps clarify the mechanisms of action. Recommendations specific to PRT implementation and use of the methodology for other interventions are discussed.

AB - Background: Research in autism spectrum disorders (ASD)has identified a need to understand key components of complex evidence-based practices (EBP). One approach involves examining the relationship between component use and child behavior. Aims: This study provides initial evidence for identifying key components in a specific EBP, Pivotal Response Training (PRT). We examined which components were related to child response and evaluated relationships between provider characteristics, child characteristics and component intensity. Methods: Trained coders reviewed archival videos (n = 278)for PRT fidelity and child behavior. We completed multi-level regression and latent profile analysis to examine relationships between intensity of individual or combinations of PRT components and child behavior, and moderators of component use. Results: Analyses indicated differential relationships between specific components and child behaviors which may support methods of altering intensity of components to individualize intervention. Profile analysis suggested relatively intensive use of most PRT components, especially antecedent strategies, may maximize child responsivity. Providers with postgraduate education trended toward higher intensity component use. Child characteristics did not moderate use. Implications: Careful examination of key components of ASD interventions may helps clarify the mechanisms of action. Recommendations specific to PRT implementation and use of the methodology for other interventions are discussed.

KW - Autism spectrum disorder

KW - Empirically-based practice

KW - Intervention components

KW - Key components

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064711169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85064711169&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ridd.2019.04.003

DO - 10.1016/j.ridd.2019.04.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 31031082

AN - SCOPUS:85064711169

JO - Research in Developmental Disabilities

JF - Research in Developmental Disabilities

SN - 0891-4222

ER -