Evaluation of two methodologies for lameness detection in dairy cows based on postural and gait abnormalities observed during milking and while restrained at headlock stanchions

A. García-Muñoz, G. Vidal, N. Singh, Noelia Silva Del Rio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Lameness is a critical issue on dairies with an impact on production and animal welfare. Early lameness detection followed by effective treatments could improve prognosis and cure rate of lame cows. Current methods for lameness detection are based on locomotion score (LS) that requires observation of cows walking, preferably at the exit of the milking parlor. This is a time-consuming task that is difficult to implement on large dairies. Therefore, a common methodology for lameness detection is based on milkers' and cow pushers' observations of cows walking to the milking parlor or standing at the milking stall (MPP). Observation of postural abnormalities predictive of lameness while cows are locked at stanchions (S) can be used as an alternative detection method. The objective of this research was to study the association between postural and gait abnormalities observed with S and MPP methodologies and lameness using LS ≥ 3 as the reference method, as well as to evaluate the epidemiological characteristics of those methods as a diagnostic test for lameness. A secondary objective was to describe the type of hoof lesions observed with postural and gait abnormalities detected with LS, MPP, and S methodologies. A cross-sectional study design was performed on 2274 cows from one farm in California (US). Arched back, cow-hocked, wide-stance, and favored-limb postures as well as uneven gait were observed. Both lameness detection methodologies, S and MPP, indicated that arched back and favored-limb were postural abnormalities associated with lameness. However, the epidemiological test characteristics for each of the postures evaluated as a diagnostic test for lameness indicated that both detection methods, S and MPP, had good specificity (> 0.91) but poor sensitivity (0.04-0.39). A convenience sample of 104 cows, selected based on LS > 3, favored-limb, presence of two or more abnormal postures, and gait anomalies with either S or MPP methods, received a hoof examination. Lesions were observed on cows selected by LS (17/24), MPP (21/30), and S (33/60) criteria, suggesting a lack of concordance between lameness detection methodologies and visible hoof lesions. Nevertheless, due to the lack of acceptance of LS as the lameness detection method on large commercial dairies in California, it is imperative that future research evaluates modifications of S and MPP lameness detection techniques, considering hoof lesion as reference method.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)33-40
Number of pages8
JournalPreventive Veterinary Medicine
Volume128
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

stanchions
gait
Gait
milking
lameness
Locomotion
dairy cows
Hoof and Claw
cows
locomotion
Posture
hooves
Extremities
lesions (animal)
methodology
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Walking
posture
limbs (animal)
milking parlors

Keywords

  • Hoof lesions
  • Lameness detection
  • Locomotion score

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Animals
  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

@article{7e1ea4543a244ac2a154c7c063da36e0,
title = "Evaluation of two methodologies for lameness detection in dairy cows based on postural and gait abnormalities observed during milking and while restrained at headlock stanchions",
abstract = "Lameness is a critical issue on dairies with an impact on production and animal welfare. Early lameness detection followed by effective treatments could improve prognosis and cure rate of lame cows. Current methods for lameness detection are based on locomotion score (LS) that requires observation of cows walking, preferably at the exit of the milking parlor. This is a time-consuming task that is difficult to implement on large dairies. Therefore, a common methodology for lameness detection is based on milkers' and cow pushers' observations of cows walking to the milking parlor or standing at the milking stall (MPP). Observation of postural abnormalities predictive of lameness while cows are locked at stanchions (S) can be used as an alternative detection method. The objective of this research was to study the association between postural and gait abnormalities observed with S and MPP methodologies and lameness using LS ≥ 3 as the reference method, as well as to evaluate the epidemiological characteristics of those methods as a diagnostic test for lameness. A secondary objective was to describe the type of hoof lesions observed with postural and gait abnormalities detected with LS, MPP, and S methodologies. A cross-sectional study design was performed on 2274 cows from one farm in California (US). Arched back, cow-hocked, wide-stance, and favored-limb postures as well as uneven gait were observed. Both lameness detection methodologies, S and MPP, indicated that arched back and favored-limb were postural abnormalities associated with lameness. However, the epidemiological test characteristics for each of the postures evaluated as a diagnostic test for lameness indicated that both detection methods, S and MPP, had good specificity (> 0.91) but poor sensitivity (0.04-0.39). A convenience sample of 104 cows, selected based on LS > 3, favored-limb, presence of two or more abnormal postures, and gait anomalies with either S or MPP methods, received a hoof examination. Lesions were observed on cows selected by LS (17/24), MPP (21/30), and S (33/60) criteria, suggesting a lack of concordance between lameness detection methodologies and visible hoof lesions. Nevertheless, due to the lack of acceptance of LS as the lameness detection method on large commercial dairies in California, it is imperative that future research evaluates modifications of S and MPP lameness detection techniques, considering hoof lesion as reference method.",
keywords = "Hoof lesions, Lameness detection, Locomotion score",
author = "A. Garc{\'i}a-Mu{\~n}oz and G. Vidal and N. Singh and {Silva Del Rio}, Noelia",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.04.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "128",
pages = "33--40",
journal = "Preventive Veterinary Medicine",
issn = "0167-5877",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of two methodologies for lameness detection in dairy cows based on postural and gait abnormalities observed during milking and while restrained at headlock stanchions

AU - García-Muñoz, A.

AU - Vidal, G.

AU - Singh, N.

AU - Silva Del Rio, Noelia

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Lameness is a critical issue on dairies with an impact on production and animal welfare. Early lameness detection followed by effective treatments could improve prognosis and cure rate of lame cows. Current methods for lameness detection are based on locomotion score (LS) that requires observation of cows walking, preferably at the exit of the milking parlor. This is a time-consuming task that is difficult to implement on large dairies. Therefore, a common methodology for lameness detection is based on milkers' and cow pushers' observations of cows walking to the milking parlor or standing at the milking stall (MPP). Observation of postural abnormalities predictive of lameness while cows are locked at stanchions (S) can be used as an alternative detection method. The objective of this research was to study the association between postural and gait abnormalities observed with S and MPP methodologies and lameness using LS ≥ 3 as the reference method, as well as to evaluate the epidemiological characteristics of those methods as a diagnostic test for lameness. A secondary objective was to describe the type of hoof lesions observed with postural and gait abnormalities detected with LS, MPP, and S methodologies. A cross-sectional study design was performed on 2274 cows from one farm in California (US). Arched back, cow-hocked, wide-stance, and favored-limb postures as well as uneven gait were observed. Both lameness detection methodologies, S and MPP, indicated that arched back and favored-limb were postural abnormalities associated with lameness. However, the epidemiological test characteristics for each of the postures evaluated as a diagnostic test for lameness indicated that both detection methods, S and MPP, had good specificity (> 0.91) but poor sensitivity (0.04-0.39). A convenience sample of 104 cows, selected based on LS > 3, favored-limb, presence of two or more abnormal postures, and gait anomalies with either S or MPP methods, received a hoof examination. Lesions were observed on cows selected by LS (17/24), MPP (21/30), and S (33/60) criteria, suggesting a lack of concordance between lameness detection methodologies and visible hoof lesions. Nevertheless, due to the lack of acceptance of LS as the lameness detection method on large commercial dairies in California, it is imperative that future research evaluates modifications of S and MPP lameness detection techniques, considering hoof lesion as reference method.

AB - Lameness is a critical issue on dairies with an impact on production and animal welfare. Early lameness detection followed by effective treatments could improve prognosis and cure rate of lame cows. Current methods for lameness detection are based on locomotion score (LS) that requires observation of cows walking, preferably at the exit of the milking parlor. This is a time-consuming task that is difficult to implement on large dairies. Therefore, a common methodology for lameness detection is based on milkers' and cow pushers' observations of cows walking to the milking parlor or standing at the milking stall (MPP). Observation of postural abnormalities predictive of lameness while cows are locked at stanchions (S) can be used as an alternative detection method. The objective of this research was to study the association between postural and gait abnormalities observed with S and MPP methodologies and lameness using LS ≥ 3 as the reference method, as well as to evaluate the epidemiological characteristics of those methods as a diagnostic test for lameness. A secondary objective was to describe the type of hoof lesions observed with postural and gait abnormalities detected with LS, MPP, and S methodologies. A cross-sectional study design was performed on 2274 cows from one farm in California (US). Arched back, cow-hocked, wide-stance, and favored-limb postures as well as uneven gait were observed. Both lameness detection methodologies, S and MPP, indicated that arched back and favored-limb were postural abnormalities associated with lameness. However, the epidemiological test characteristics for each of the postures evaluated as a diagnostic test for lameness indicated that both detection methods, S and MPP, had good specificity (> 0.91) but poor sensitivity (0.04-0.39). A convenience sample of 104 cows, selected based on LS > 3, favored-limb, presence of two or more abnormal postures, and gait anomalies with either S or MPP methods, received a hoof examination. Lesions were observed on cows selected by LS (17/24), MPP (21/30), and S (33/60) criteria, suggesting a lack of concordance between lameness detection methodologies and visible hoof lesions. Nevertheless, due to the lack of acceptance of LS as the lameness detection method on large commercial dairies in California, it is imperative that future research evaluates modifications of S and MPP lameness detection techniques, considering hoof lesion as reference method.

KW - Hoof lesions

KW - Lameness detection

KW - Locomotion score

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962786871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962786871&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.04.005

DO - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2016.04.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 27237388

AN - SCOPUS:84962786871

VL - 128

SP - 33

EP - 40

JO - Preventive Veterinary Medicine

JF - Preventive Veterinary Medicine

SN - 0167-5877

ER -