Evaluation of the impact and need for use of a safety guidewire during ureteroscopy

Jonathan A. Eandi, Brian Hu, Roger Low

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Purpose: The routine use of a "safety" guidewire adjacent to the ureteroscope during upper tract endoscopy is advocated in surgical texts and by many endourologists. Our experience has led us to theorize that a safety guidewire complicates ureteroscopy by providing resistance to introduction of the endoscope and by creating an obstruction to ureteroscopic instrumentation. To examine our theory, we developed a porcine animal model to evaluate the impact of the presence of a safety guidewire and reviewed our clinical experience, which routinely does not use a safety guidewire during ureteroscopy. Patients and Methods: An ex vivo model was created using the excised urinary tract of freshly slaughtered pigs. The forces needed to advance both a semirigid and flexible ureteroscope in the ureter were measured with and without the presence of a 0.035-inch safety guidewire. The clinical records of all patients undergoing ureteroscopy over a 4-year period were reviewed. Results: On average, an additional 12 and 20 g of force were needed to introduce the semirigid and flexible ureteroscope when a guidewire was present. For the chosen study period, 361 patients underwent ureteroscopic procedures without the placement of a safety guidewire. No patient experienced an intraoperative complication related to the absence of a safety wire. Conclusions: The presence of a safety guidewire adjacent to the endoscope inhibits passage of the ureteroscope in an in vitro animal model. Technologic advancements in ureteroscope design and use of the holmium laser lithotrite minimize ureteral trauma and obviate the need for routine use of a safety wire during ureteroscopy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1653-1658
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Endourology
Volume22
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2008

Fingerprint

Ureteroscopy
Ureteroscopes
Safety
Endoscopes
Swine
Animal Models
Intraoperative Complications
Solid-State Lasers
Ureter
Urinary Tract
Endoscopy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Evaluation of the impact and need for use of a safety guidewire during ureteroscopy. / Eandi, Jonathan A.; Hu, Brian; Low, Roger.

In: Journal of Endourology, Vol. 22, No. 8, 01.08.2008, p. 1653-1658.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eandi, Jonathan A. ; Hu, Brian ; Low, Roger. / Evaluation of the impact and need for use of a safety guidewire during ureteroscopy. In: Journal of Endourology. 2008 ; Vol. 22, No. 8. pp. 1653-1658.
@article{aa7f7a6373ac408ea79cc4a878d6dad7,
title = "Evaluation of the impact and need for use of a safety guidewire during ureteroscopy",
abstract = "Background and Purpose: The routine use of a {"}safety{"} guidewire adjacent to the ureteroscope during upper tract endoscopy is advocated in surgical texts and by many endourologists. Our experience has led us to theorize that a safety guidewire complicates ureteroscopy by providing resistance to introduction of the endoscope and by creating an obstruction to ureteroscopic instrumentation. To examine our theory, we developed a porcine animal model to evaluate the impact of the presence of a safety guidewire and reviewed our clinical experience, which routinely does not use a safety guidewire during ureteroscopy. Patients and Methods: An ex vivo model was created using the excised urinary tract of freshly slaughtered pigs. The forces needed to advance both a semirigid and flexible ureteroscope in the ureter were measured with and without the presence of a 0.035-inch safety guidewire. The clinical records of all patients undergoing ureteroscopy over a 4-year period were reviewed. Results: On average, an additional 12 and 20 g of force were needed to introduce the semirigid and flexible ureteroscope when a guidewire was present. For the chosen study period, 361 patients underwent ureteroscopic procedures without the placement of a safety guidewire. No patient experienced an intraoperative complication related to the absence of a safety wire. Conclusions: The presence of a safety guidewire adjacent to the endoscope inhibits passage of the ureteroscope in an in vitro animal model. Technologic advancements in ureteroscope design and use of the holmium laser lithotrite minimize ureteral trauma and obviate the need for routine use of a safety wire during ureteroscopy.",
author = "Eandi, {Jonathan A.} and Brian Hu and Roger Low",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/end.2008.0071",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "1653--1658",
journal = "Journal of Endourology",
issn = "0892-7790",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the impact and need for use of a safety guidewire during ureteroscopy

AU - Eandi, Jonathan A.

AU - Hu, Brian

AU - Low, Roger

PY - 2008/8/1

Y1 - 2008/8/1

N2 - Background and Purpose: The routine use of a "safety" guidewire adjacent to the ureteroscope during upper tract endoscopy is advocated in surgical texts and by many endourologists. Our experience has led us to theorize that a safety guidewire complicates ureteroscopy by providing resistance to introduction of the endoscope and by creating an obstruction to ureteroscopic instrumentation. To examine our theory, we developed a porcine animal model to evaluate the impact of the presence of a safety guidewire and reviewed our clinical experience, which routinely does not use a safety guidewire during ureteroscopy. Patients and Methods: An ex vivo model was created using the excised urinary tract of freshly slaughtered pigs. The forces needed to advance both a semirigid and flexible ureteroscope in the ureter were measured with and without the presence of a 0.035-inch safety guidewire. The clinical records of all patients undergoing ureteroscopy over a 4-year period were reviewed. Results: On average, an additional 12 and 20 g of force were needed to introduce the semirigid and flexible ureteroscope when a guidewire was present. For the chosen study period, 361 patients underwent ureteroscopic procedures without the placement of a safety guidewire. No patient experienced an intraoperative complication related to the absence of a safety wire. Conclusions: The presence of a safety guidewire adjacent to the endoscope inhibits passage of the ureteroscope in an in vitro animal model. Technologic advancements in ureteroscope design and use of the holmium laser lithotrite minimize ureteral trauma and obviate the need for routine use of a safety wire during ureteroscopy.

AB - Background and Purpose: The routine use of a "safety" guidewire adjacent to the ureteroscope during upper tract endoscopy is advocated in surgical texts and by many endourologists. Our experience has led us to theorize that a safety guidewire complicates ureteroscopy by providing resistance to introduction of the endoscope and by creating an obstruction to ureteroscopic instrumentation. To examine our theory, we developed a porcine animal model to evaluate the impact of the presence of a safety guidewire and reviewed our clinical experience, which routinely does not use a safety guidewire during ureteroscopy. Patients and Methods: An ex vivo model was created using the excised urinary tract of freshly slaughtered pigs. The forces needed to advance both a semirigid and flexible ureteroscope in the ureter were measured with and without the presence of a 0.035-inch safety guidewire. The clinical records of all patients undergoing ureteroscopy over a 4-year period were reviewed. Results: On average, an additional 12 and 20 g of force were needed to introduce the semirigid and flexible ureteroscope when a guidewire was present. For the chosen study period, 361 patients underwent ureteroscopic procedures without the placement of a safety guidewire. No patient experienced an intraoperative complication related to the absence of a safety wire. Conclusions: The presence of a safety guidewire adjacent to the endoscope inhibits passage of the ureteroscope in an in vitro animal model. Technologic advancements in ureteroscope design and use of the holmium laser lithotrite minimize ureteral trauma and obviate the need for routine use of a safety wire during ureteroscopy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=50149111427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=50149111427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/end.2008.0071

DO - 10.1089/end.2008.0071

M3 - Article

C2 - 18721045

AN - SCOPUS:50149111427

VL - 22

SP - 1653

EP - 1658

JO - Journal of Endourology

JF - Journal of Endourology

SN - 0892-7790

IS - 8

ER -