Evaluation of the Accuracy and Use of X-Ray Markers in Digital Templating for Total Hip Arthroplasty

Christopher Bayne, Michael Krosin, Thomas C. Barber

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite benefits of digital templating, digital image acquisition techniques often make image magnification unknown and variable. We assessed the accuracy of digital x-ray scaling devices based on position. Radiographs of 106 total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients were studied to determine the accuracy of 2 digital x-ray markers at 1 of 4 positions by comparing true to expected x-ray magnification. The Pearson r coefficient was calculated as an indicator of measurement correlation between investigators. Greater accuracy was obtained for markers placed at the greater trochanter without skin overlap than for markers placed with soft tissue or bone overlap on x-ray. Flexible positioning markers provided greater accuracy than adhesive markers. Based on our data, we suggest positioning at the greater trochanter without skin overlap on x-ray and suggest flexible positioning over adhesive marker use.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)407-413
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Arthroplasty
Hip
X-Rays
Adhesives
Femur
Skin
Research Personnel
Bone and Bones
Equipment and Supplies

Keywords

  • accuracy
  • digital templating
  • magnification
  • scaling
  • total hip arthroplasty
  • x-ray markers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Evaluation of the Accuracy and Use of X-Ray Markers in Digital Templating for Total Hip Arthroplasty. / Bayne, Christopher; Krosin, Michael; Barber, Thomas C.

In: Journal of Arthroplasty, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.04.2009, p. 407-413.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{bbc368a35fbc4104ab35a3f5f47e0241,
title = "Evaluation of the Accuracy and Use of X-Ray Markers in Digital Templating for Total Hip Arthroplasty",
abstract = "Despite benefits of digital templating, digital image acquisition techniques often make image magnification unknown and variable. We assessed the accuracy of digital x-ray scaling devices based on position. Radiographs of 106 total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients were studied to determine the accuracy of 2 digital x-ray markers at 1 of 4 positions by comparing true to expected x-ray magnification. The Pearson r coefficient was calculated as an indicator of measurement correlation between investigators. Greater accuracy was obtained for markers placed at the greater trochanter without skin overlap than for markers placed with soft tissue or bone overlap on x-ray. Flexible positioning markers provided greater accuracy than adhesive markers. Based on our data, we suggest positioning at the greater trochanter without skin overlap on x-ray and suggest flexible positioning over adhesive marker use.",
keywords = "accuracy, digital templating, magnification, scaling, total hip arthroplasty, x-ray markers",
author = "Christopher Bayne and Michael Krosin and Barber, {Thomas C.}",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.arth.2007.11.020",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "407--413",
journal = "Journal of Arthroplasty",
issn = "0883-5403",
publisher = "Churchill Livingstone",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of the Accuracy and Use of X-Ray Markers in Digital Templating for Total Hip Arthroplasty

AU - Bayne, Christopher

AU - Krosin, Michael

AU - Barber, Thomas C.

PY - 2009/4/1

Y1 - 2009/4/1

N2 - Despite benefits of digital templating, digital image acquisition techniques often make image magnification unknown and variable. We assessed the accuracy of digital x-ray scaling devices based on position. Radiographs of 106 total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients were studied to determine the accuracy of 2 digital x-ray markers at 1 of 4 positions by comparing true to expected x-ray magnification. The Pearson r coefficient was calculated as an indicator of measurement correlation between investigators. Greater accuracy was obtained for markers placed at the greater trochanter without skin overlap than for markers placed with soft tissue or bone overlap on x-ray. Flexible positioning markers provided greater accuracy than adhesive markers. Based on our data, we suggest positioning at the greater trochanter without skin overlap on x-ray and suggest flexible positioning over adhesive marker use.

AB - Despite benefits of digital templating, digital image acquisition techniques often make image magnification unknown and variable. We assessed the accuracy of digital x-ray scaling devices based on position. Radiographs of 106 total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients were studied to determine the accuracy of 2 digital x-ray markers at 1 of 4 positions by comparing true to expected x-ray magnification. The Pearson r coefficient was calculated as an indicator of measurement correlation between investigators. Greater accuracy was obtained for markers placed at the greater trochanter without skin overlap than for markers placed with soft tissue or bone overlap on x-ray. Flexible positioning markers provided greater accuracy than adhesive markers. Based on our data, we suggest positioning at the greater trochanter without skin overlap on x-ray and suggest flexible positioning over adhesive marker use.

KW - accuracy

KW - digital templating

KW - magnification

KW - scaling

KW - total hip arthroplasty

KW - x-ray markers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62349116213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=62349116213&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.arth.2007.11.020

DO - 10.1016/j.arth.2007.11.020

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 407

EP - 413

JO - Journal of Arthroplasty

JF - Journal of Arthroplasty

SN - 0883-5403

IS - 3

ER -