Evaluation of non-response to the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS) survey

Taimur Dad, Hocine Tighiouart, Joshua J Fenton, Eduardo Lacson, Klemens B. Meyer, Dana C. Miskulin, Daniel E. Weiner, Michelle M. Richardson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS) Survey is the first patient reported outcome measure included in the U.S. Medicare End Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program. Administered twice yearly, it assesses in-center dialysis experience and survey responses are tied to dialysis facility payments. Low response rates, currently approximately 35%, raise concern for possible underrepresentation of patient groups. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of survey administration in 2012 to all in-center hemodialysis patients in Dialysis Clinic, Inc. (DCI) facilities nationally over 18 years old who received hemodialysis at their facility for at least 3 months. Patient-level covariates included demographic, clinical, laboratory, and functional characteristics. Random effects multivariable logistic regression was used to assess survey non-response. Results: Among 11,055 eligible patients 6541 (59%) were non-responders. Of the remaining 4514 responders, 549 (14%) surveys were not usable due to presence of proxy help or incomplete responses. Non-responders were more likely to be men, non-white, younger, single, dual Medicare/Medicaid eligible, less educated, non-English speaking, and not active on the transplant list; non-responders had longer ESRD vintage, lower body mass index, lower serum albumin, worse functional status, and more hospitalizations, missed treatments, and shortened treatments. Similar associations were found using more parsimonious multivariable analyses and after imputing missing data. Conclusions: Non-responders to the ICH CAHPS significantly differed from responders, broadly spanning individuals with fewer socioeconomic advantages and greater illness burden, raising limitations in interpreting facility survey results. Future research should assess reasons for non-response to improve ICH CAHPS generalizability and utility.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number790
JournalBMC Health Services Research
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 19 2018

Fingerprint

Health Personnel
Renal Dialysis
Delivery of Health Care
Dialysis
Medicare
Chronic Kidney Failure
Cross-Sectional Studies
Cost of Illness
Medicaid
Proxy
Serum Albumin
Motivation
Hospitalization
Body Mass Index
Logistic Models
Demography
Surveys and Questionnaires
Transplants
Therapeutics

Keywords

  • CAHPS
  • Hemodialysis
  • ICH CAHPS
  • Patient experience
  • Patient reported outcome
  • Patient satisfaction
  • Survey

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Evaluation of non-response to the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS) survey. / Dad, Taimur; Tighiouart, Hocine; Fenton, Joshua J; Lacson, Eduardo; Meyer, Klemens B.; Miskulin, Dana C.; Weiner, Daniel E.; Richardson, Michelle M.

In: BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, 790, 19.10.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Dad, Taimur ; Tighiouart, Hocine ; Fenton, Joshua J ; Lacson, Eduardo ; Meyer, Klemens B. ; Miskulin, Dana C. ; Weiner, Daniel E. ; Richardson, Michelle M. / Evaluation of non-response to the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS) survey. In: BMC Health Services Research. 2018 ; Vol. 18, No. 1.
@article{119a8756ed444828b55126d98344513a,
title = "Evaluation of non-response to the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS) survey",
abstract = "Background: The In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS) Survey is the first patient reported outcome measure included in the U.S. Medicare End Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program. Administered twice yearly, it assesses in-center dialysis experience and survey responses are tied to dialysis facility payments. Low response rates, currently approximately 35{\%}, raise concern for possible underrepresentation of patient groups. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of survey administration in 2012 to all in-center hemodialysis patients in Dialysis Clinic, Inc. (DCI) facilities nationally over 18 years old who received hemodialysis at their facility for at least 3 months. Patient-level covariates included demographic, clinical, laboratory, and functional characteristics. Random effects multivariable logistic regression was used to assess survey non-response. Results: Among 11,055 eligible patients 6541 (59{\%}) were non-responders. Of the remaining 4514 responders, 549 (14{\%}) surveys were not usable due to presence of proxy help or incomplete responses. Non-responders were more likely to be men, non-white, younger, single, dual Medicare/Medicaid eligible, less educated, non-English speaking, and not active on the transplant list; non-responders had longer ESRD vintage, lower body mass index, lower serum albumin, worse functional status, and more hospitalizations, missed treatments, and shortened treatments. Similar associations were found using more parsimonious multivariable analyses and after imputing missing data. Conclusions: Non-responders to the ICH CAHPS significantly differed from responders, broadly spanning individuals with fewer socioeconomic advantages and greater illness burden, raising limitations in interpreting facility survey results. Future research should assess reasons for non-response to improve ICH CAHPS generalizability and utility.",
keywords = "CAHPS, Hemodialysis, ICH CAHPS, Patient experience, Patient reported outcome, Patient satisfaction, Survey",
author = "Taimur Dad and Hocine Tighiouart and Fenton, {Joshua J} and Eduardo Lacson and Meyer, {Klemens B.} and Miskulin, {Dana C.} and Weiner, {Daniel E.} and Richardson, {Michelle M.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1186/s12913-018-3618-4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "18",
journal = "BMC Health Services Research",
issn = "1472-6963",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of non-response to the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS) survey

AU - Dad, Taimur

AU - Tighiouart, Hocine

AU - Fenton, Joshua J

AU - Lacson, Eduardo

AU - Meyer, Klemens B.

AU - Miskulin, Dana C.

AU - Weiner, Daniel E.

AU - Richardson, Michelle M.

PY - 2018/10/19

Y1 - 2018/10/19

N2 - Background: The In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS) Survey is the first patient reported outcome measure included in the U.S. Medicare End Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program. Administered twice yearly, it assesses in-center dialysis experience and survey responses are tied to dialysis facility payments. Low response rates, currently approximately 35%, raise concern for possible underrepresentation of patient groups. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of survey administration in 2012 to all in-center hemodialysis patients in Dialysis Clinic, Inc. (DCI) facilities nationally over 18 years old who received hemodialysis at their facility for at least 3 months. Patient-level covariates included demographic, clinical, laboratory, and functional characteristics. Random effects multivariable logistic regression was used to assess survey non-response. Results: Among 11,055 eligible patients 6541 (59%) were non-responders. Of the remaining 4514 responders, 549 (14%) surveys were not usable due to presence of proxy help or incomplete responses. Non-responders were more likely to be men, non-white, younger, single, dual Medicare/Medicaid eligible, less educated, non-English speaking, and not active on the transplant list; non-responders had longer ESRD vintage, lower body mass index, lower serum albumin, worse functional status, and more hospitalizations, missed treatments, and shortened treatments. Similar associations were found using more parsimonious multivariable analyses and after imputing missing data. Conclusions: Non-responders to the ICH CAHPS significantly differed from responders, broadly spanning individuals with fewer socioeconomic advantages and greater illness burden, raising limitations in interpreting facility survey results. Future research should assess reasons for non-response to improve ICH CAHPS generalizability and utility.

AB - Background: The In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH CAHPS) Survey is the first patient reported outcome measure included in the U.S. Medicare End Stage Renal Disease Quality Incentive Program. Administered twice yearly, it assesses in-center dialysis experience and survey responses are tied to dialysis facility payments. Low response rates, currently approximately 35%, raise concern for possible underrepresentation of patient groups. Methods: Cross-sectional analysis of survey administration in 2012 to all in-center hemodialysis patients in Dialysis Clinic, Inc. (DCI) facilities nationally over 18 years old who received hemodialysis at their facility for at least 3 months. Patient-level covariates included demographic, clinical, laboratory, and functional characteristics. Random effects multivariable logistic regression was used to assess survey non-response. Results: Among 11,055 eligible patients 6541 (59%) were non-responders. Of the remaining 4514 responders, 549 (14%) surveys were not usable due to presence of proxy help or incomplete responses. Non-responders were more likely to be men, non-white, younger, single, dual Medicare/Medicaid eligible, less educated, non-English speaking, and not active on the transplant list; non-responders had longer ESRD vintage, lower body mass index, lower serum albumin, worse functional status, and more hospitalizations, missed treatments, and shortened treatments. Similar associations were found using more parsimonious multivariable analyses and after imputing missing data. Conclusions: Non-responders to the ICH CAHPS significantly differed from responders, broadly spanning individuals with fewer socioeconomic advantages and greater illness burden, raising limitations in interpreting facility survey results. Future research should assess reasons for non-response to improve ICH CAHPS generalizability and utility.

KW - CAHPS

KW - Hemodialysis

KW - ICH CAHPS

KW - Patient experience

KW - Patient reported outcome

KW - Patient satisfaction

KW - Survey

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055073264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055073264&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s12913-018-3618-4

DO - 10.1186/s12913-018-3618-4

M3 - Article

VL - 18

JO - BMC Health Services Research

JF - BMC Health Services Research

SN - 1472-6963

IS - 1

M1 - 790

ER -