Evaluation of displays for medical x-ray applications using observer performance

Patrik Sund, Markus Håkansson, Lars Lindskog, Ulf Tylen, Susanne Kheddache, Lars Gunnar Månsson

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A physical and clinical evaluation of four different display systems intended for the presentation of medical x-ray images was performed. State-of-the-art b/w display devices were studied as well as a low-cost color display. The systems tested were: a) CRT 21″ b/w 1 K, b) CRT 21″ b/w, 2 K, c) CRT 21″ color, 1 K, d) LCD 20.8″ b/w, 1.5 K. All displays were adjusted to conform to DICOM 3.0 part 14. The physical evaluation included quantities such as resolution, flickering and uniformity. The clinical evaluation was performed by 15 radiologists using visual grading analysis of one phantom chest image and 12 clinical images of the chest and small bones. One subtle pathological structure and one anatomical structure were rated. The CRT b/w 1 K display was used as the reference display system. All displays were evaluated at two different luminance levels (160 and 320 cd/m 2) and viewed under two different ambient light conditions (10 and 40 lux). The LCD 1.5 K display was rated best and the color CRT display was rated worst for both luminance levels. The result for the color CRT display - unable to produce more than 120 cd/m 2 - at the high ambient light setting was very poor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationProceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
EditorsD.P. Chakraborty, E.A. Krupinski
Pages139-144
Number of pages6
Volume4686
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes
EventMedical Imaging 2002: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment - San Diego, CA, United States
Duration: Feb 26 2002Feb 28 2002

Other

OtherMedical Imaging 2002: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment
CountryUnited States
CitySan Diego, CA
Period2/26/022/28/02

Fingerprint

display devices
Cathode ray tubes
Display devices
color
X rays
evaluation
chest
luminance
x rays
Color
bones
Liquid crystal displays
Luminance
Flickering
Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM)
Bone
Costs

Keywords

  • CRT
  • Display
  • Flat panel
  • Image quality
  • LCD
  • Monitor
  • Visual grading analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Condensed Matter Physics

Cite this

Sund, P., Håkansson, M., Lindskog, L., Tylen, U., Kheddache, S., & Månsson, L. G. (2002). Evaluation of displays for medical x-ray applications using observer performance. In D. P. Chakraborty, & E. A. Krupinski (Eds.), Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering (Vol. 4686, pp. 139-144) https://doi.org/10.1117/12.462671

Evaluation of displays for medical x-ray applications using observer performance. / Sund, Patrik; Håkansson, Markus; Lindskog, Lars; Tylen, Ulf; Kheddache, Susanne; Månsson, Lars Gunnar.

Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. ed. / D.P. Chakraborty; E.A. Krupinski. Vol. 4686 2002. p. 139-144.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Sund, P, Håkansson, M, Lindskog, L, Tylen, U, Kheddache, S & Månsson, LG 2002, Evaluation of displays for medical x-ray applications using observer performance. in DP Chakraborty & EA Krupinski (eds), Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. vol. 4686, pp. 139-144, Medical Imaging 2002: Image Perception, Observer Performance, and Technology Assessment, San Diego, CA, United States, 2/26/02. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.462671
Sund P, Håkansson M, Lindskog L, Tylen U, Kheddache S, Månsson LG. Evaluation of displays for medical x-ray applications using observer performance. In Chakraborty DP, Krupinski EA, editors, Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. Vol. 4686. 2002. p. 139-144 https://doi.org/10.1117/12.462671
Sund, Patrik ; Håkansson, Markus ; Lindskog, Lars ; Tylen, Ulf ; Kheddache, Susanne ; Månsson, Lars Gunnar. / Evaluation of displays for medical x-ray applications using observer performance. Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. editor / D.P. Chakraborty ; E.A. Krupinski. Vol. 4686 2002. pp. 139-144
@inproceedings{f6627d36c87649f5bd1ddd25eae41512,
title = "Evaluation of displays for medical x-ray applications using observer performance",
abstract = "A physical and clinical evaluation of four different display systems intended for the presentation of medical x-ray images was performed. State-of-the-art b/w display devices were studied as well as a low-cost color display. The systems tested were: a) CRT 21″ b/w 1 K, b) CRT 21″ b/w, 2 K, c) CRT 21″ color, 1 K, d) LCD 20.8″ b/w, 1.5 K. All displays were adjusted to conform to DICOM 3.0 part 14. The physical evaluation included quantities such as resolution, flickering and uniformity. The clinical evaluation was performed by 15 radiologists using visual grading analysis of one phantom chest image and 12 clinical images of the chest and small bones. One subtle pathological structure and one anatomical structure were rated. The CRT b/w 1 K display was used as the reference display system. All displays were evaluated at two different luminance levels (160 and 320 cd/m 2) and viewed under two different ambient light conditions (10 and 40 lux). The LCD 1.5 K display was rated best and the color CRT display was rated worst for both luminance levels. The result for the color CRT display - unable to produce more than 120 cd/m 2 - at the high ambient light setting was very poor.",
keywords = "CRT, Display, Flat panel, Image quality, LCD, Monitor, Visual grading analysis",
author = "Patrik Sund and Markus H{\aa}kansson and Lars Lindskog and Ulf Tylen and Susanne Kheddache and M{\aa}nsson, {Lars Gunnar}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1117/12.462671",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "4686",
pages = "139--144",
editor = "D.P. Chakraborty and E.A. Krupinski",
booktitle = "Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Evaluation of displays for medical x-ray applications using observer performance

AU - Sund, Patrik

AU - Håkansson, Markus

AU - Lindskog, Lars

AU - Tylen, Ulf

AU - Kheddache, Susanne

AU - Månsson, Lars Gunnar

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - A physical and clinical evaluation of four different display systems intended for the presentation of medical x-ray images was performed. State-of-the-art b/w display devices were studied as well as a low-cost color display. The systems tested were: a) CRT 21″ b/w 1 K, b) CRT 21″ b/w, 2 K, c) CRT 21″ color, 1 K, d) LCD 20.8″ b/w, 1.5 K. All displays were adjusted to conform to DICOM 3.0 part 14. The physical evaluation included quantities such as resolution, flickering and uniformity. The clinical evaluation was performed by 15 radiologists using visual grading analysis of one phantom chest image and 12 clinical images of the chest and small bones. One subtle pathological structure and one anatomical structure were rated. The CRT b/w 1 K display was used as the reference display system. All displays were evaluated at two different luminance levels (160 and 320 cd/m 2) and viewed under two different ambient light conditions (10 and 40 lux). The LCD 1.5 K display was rated best and the color CRT display was rated worst for both luminance levels. The result for the color CRT display - unable to produce more than 120 cd/m 2 - at the high ambient light setting was very poor.

AB - A physical and clinical evaluation of four different display systems intended for the presentation of medical x-ray images was performed. State-of-the-art b/w display devices were studied as well as a low-cost color display. The systems tested were: a) CRT 21″ b/w 1 K, b) CRT 21″ b/w, 2 K, c) CRT 21″ color, 1 K, d) LCD 20.8″ b/w, 1.5 K. All displays were adjusted to conform to DICOM 3.0 part 14. The physical evaluation included quantities such as resolution, flickering and uniformity. The clinical evaluation was performed by 15 radiologists using visual grading analysis of one phantom chest image and 12 clinical images of the chest and small bones. One subtle pathological structure and one anatomical structure were rated. The CRT b/w 1 K display was used as the reference display system. All displays were evaluated at two different luminance levels (160 and 320 cd/m 2) and viewed under two different ambient light conditions (10 and 40 lux). The LCD 1.5 K display was rated best and the color CRT display was rated worst for both luminance levels. The result for the color CRT display - unable to produce more than 120 cd/m 2 - at the high ambient light setting was very poor.

KW - CRT

KW - Display

KW - Flat panel

KW - Image quality

KW - LCD

KW - Monitor

KW - Visual grading analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036028384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036028384&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1117/12.462671

DO - 10.1117/12.462671

M3 - Conference contribution

VL - 4686

SP - 139

EP - 144

BT - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering

A2 - Chakraborty, D.P.

A2 - Krupinski, E.A.

ER -