Evaluation of California's Armed and Prohibited Persons System

Study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial

Garen J Wintemute, Laurel A Beckett, Philip H Kass, Daniel J Tancredi, David Studdert, Glenn Pierce, Anthony A. Braga, Mona A. Wright, Magdalena Cerda

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background and objective Too little is known about the effectiveness of efforts to prevent firearm violence. Our objective is to evaluate California's Armed and Prohibited Persons System (APPS), a law enforcement intervention that seeks to recover firearms from individuals who purchased them legally but subsequently became prohibited from having access to firearms. Prohibitions usually arise from events suggesting an increased risk for future violence. Design and study population This grouprandomised trial involves approximately 20 000 APPSeligible individuals in 1041 communities. Randomisation was performed at the community level, to early or later intervention (Group 1 and Group 2, respectively) with stratification by region, population and violent crime rate. Methods APPS is being implemented by the California Department of Justice. The principal outcome measure is the incidence of arrest for a firearm-related or violent crime. Primary analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis, comparing individuals in Group 1 and Group 2 communities. Analyses will focus on time to event, using proportional hazards regression with adjustment for the clustered nature of the data and incorporating individualand community-level characteristics. Secondary analyses will examine the effect of the intervention on an as treated basis, effects on subgroups, and effects on community-wide measures such as crime rates. Discussion APPS may have a significant impact on risk for future violence among members of its target population. The findings of this study will likely be generalisable and have clear implications for violence prevention policy and practice. Trial registration number NCT02318732.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInjury Prevention
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Oct 11 2016

Fingerprint

Firearms
Violence
Crime
Law Enforcement
Health Services Needs and Demand
Social Justice
Random Allocation
Population
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Haemophilus influenzae type b-polysaccharide vaccine-diphtheria toxoid conjugate
Incidence

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

@article{2de2d9cea4f84519b84b61b5998b1a6a,
title = "Evaluation of California's Armed and Prohibited Persons System: Study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial",
abstract = "Background and objective Too little is known about the effectiveness of efforts to prevent firearm violence. Our objective is to evaluate California's Armed and Prohibited Persons System (APPS), a law enforcement intervention that seeks to recover firearms from individuals who purchased them legally but subsequently became prohibited from having access to firearms. Prohibitions usually arise from events suggesting an increased risk for future violence. Design and study population This grouprandomised trial involves approximately 20 000 APPSeligible individuals in 1041 communities. Randomisation was performed at the community level, to early or later intervention (Group 1 and Group 2, respectively) with stratification by region, population and violent crime rate. Methods APPS is being implemented by the California Department of Justice. The principal outcome measure is the incidence of arrest for a firearm-related or violent crime. Primary analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis, comparing individuals in Group 1 and Group 2 communities. Analyses will focus on time to event, using proportional hazards regression with adjustment for the clustered nature of the data and incorporating individualand community-level characteristics. Secondary analyses will examine the effect of the intervention on an as treated basis, effects on subgroups, and effects on community-wide measures such as crime rates. Discussion APPS may have a significant impact on risk for future violence among members of its target population. The findings of this study will likely be generalisable and have clear implications for violence prevention policy and practice. Trial registration number NCT02318732.",
author = "Wintemute, {Garen J} and Beckett, {Laurel A} and Kass, {Philip H} and Tancredi, {Daniel J} and David Studdert and Glenn Pierce and Braga, {Anthony A.} and Wright, {Mona A.} and Magdalena Cerda",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042194",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Injury Prevention",
issn = "1353-8047",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of California's Armed and Prohibited Persons System

T2 - Study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial

AU - Wintemute, Garen J

AU - Beckett, Laurel A

AU - Kass, Philip H

AU - Tancredi, Daniel J

AU - Studdert, David

AU - Pierce, Glenn

AU - Braga, Anthony A.

AU - Wright, Mona A.

AU - Cerda, Magdalena

PY - 2016/10/11

Y1 - 2016/10/11

N2 - Background and objective Too little is known about the effectiveness of efforts to prevent firearm violence. Our objective is to evaluate California's Armed and Prohibited Persons System (APPS), a law enforcement intervention that seeks to recover firearms from individuals who purchased them legally but subsequently became prohibited from having access to firearms. Prohibitions usually arise from events suggesting an increased risk for future violence. Design and study population This grouprandomised trial involves approximately 20 000 APPSeligible individuals in 1041 communities. Randomisation was performed at the community level, to early or later intervention (Group 1 and Group 2, respectively) with stratification by region, population and violent crime rate. Methods APPS is being implemented by the California Department of Justice. The principal outcome measure is the incidence of arrest for a firearm-related or violent crime. Primary analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis, comparing individuals in Group 1 and Group 2 communities. Analyses will focus on time to event, using proportional hazards regression with adjustment for the clustered nature of the data and incorporating individualand community-level characteristics. Secondary analyses will examine the effect of the intervention on an as treated basis, effects on subgroups, and effects on community-wide measures such as crime rates. Discussion APPS may have a significant impact on risk for future violence among members of its target population. The findings of this study will likely be generalisable and have clear implications for violence prevention policy and practice. Trial registration number NCT02318732.

AB - Background and objective Too little is known about the effectiveness of efforts to prevent firearm violence. Our objective is to evaluate California's Armed and Prohibited Persons System (APPS), a law enforcement intervention that seeks to recover firearms from individuals who purchased them legally but subsequently became prohibited from having access to firearms. Prohibitions usually arise from events suggesting an increased risk for future violence. Design and study population This grouprandomised trial involves approximately 20 000 APPSeligible individuals in 1041 communities. Randomisation was performed at the community level, to early or later intervention (Group 1 and Group 2, respectively) with stratification by region, population and violent crime rate. Methods APPS is being implemented by the California Department of Justice. The principal outcome measure is the incidence of arrest for a firearm-related or violent crime. Primary analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis, comparing individuals in Group 1 and Group 2 communities. Analyses will focus on time to event, using proportional hazards regression with adjustment for the clustered nature of the data and incorporating individualand community-level characteristics. Secondary analyses will examine the effect of the intervention on an as treated basis, effects on subgroups, and effects on community-wide measures such as crime rates. Discussion APPS may have a significant impact on risk for future violence among members of its target population. The findings of this study will likely be generalisable and have clear implications for violence prevention policy and practice. Trial registration number NCT02318732.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994614412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994614412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042194

DO - 10.1136/injuryprev-2016-042194

M3 - Article

JO - Injury Prevention

JF - Injury Prevention

SN - 1353-8047

ER -