Evaluation of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and two different software packages

M. D. Van Loan, N. L. Keim, K. Berg, P. L. Mayclin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures body composition, tissue distribution, bone mineral content (BMC), and bone mineral density (BMD). Differences are possible due to software versions. This investigation examined body composition, tissue distribution, BMC, and BMD measurements using a DXA (Lunar Corp., Madison, WI) with different software packages (versions 3.4 and 3,6R). Fifteen women, ages 20-40 yr, enrolled in a weight- loss study (body mass index = 28) and volunteered for body composition assessment by densitometry. BMC, BMD, and tissue distribution measurements were made using DXA. Results were analyzed once each with software versions 3.4 and 3.6R. BMC + total soft tissue, measured using DXA, was comparable to measured body weight (3.4 = 76.3 kg; 3.6R - 76.5 kg; weight = 76.5 kg). Lower BMC and BMD (5.5% and 1.8%, P < 0.01) were observed with 3.6R. Arm tissue mass was lower (1,530 g; P < 0.01) and fat declined (1,069 g; P < 0.01) with 3.6R. Leg tissue mass decreased 487 g (P < 0.01), but fat tissue increased (526 g, P < 0.01) with 3.6R. A larger fat mass (1,492 g) and lower lean mass (1,115 g) were observed with 3.6R compared with 3.4. Percent fat values by densitometry using DXA 3.4 and 3.6R were 38.1%, 39.9, and 41.9%, respectively. These results demonstrated differences in total body composition, lean and fat tissue distribution, and bone measurements from DXA software versions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)587-591
Number of pages5
JournalMedicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
Volume27
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Body Composition
Bone Density
Software
X-Rays
Tissue Distribution
Fats
Densitometry
Bone and Bones
Adipose Tissue
Weight Loss
Leg
Body Mass Index
Arm
Body Weight
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • BONE MINERAL CONTENT
  • BONE MINERAL DENSITY
  • DUAL ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY
  • SOFTWARE VERSIONS

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Evaluation of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and two different software packages. / Van Loan, M. D.; Keim, N. L.; Berg, K.; Mayclin, P. L.

In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, Vol. 27, No. 4, 1995, p. 587-591.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Van Loan, M. D. ; Keim, N. L. ; Berg, K. ; Mayclin, P. L. / Evaluation of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and two different software packages. In: Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1995 ; Vol. 27, No. 4. pp. 587-591.
@article{1813d692ec5649358d3f65afba4571be,
title = "Evaluation of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and two different software packages",
abstract = "Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures body composition, tissue distribution, bone mineral content (BMC), and bone mineral density (BMD). Differences are possible due to software versions. This investigation examined body composition, tissue distribution, BMC, and BMD measurements using a DXA (Lunar Corp., Madison, WI) with different software packages (versions 3.4 and 3,6R). Fifteen women, ages 20-40 yr, enrolled in a weight- loss study (body mass index = 28) and volunteered for body composition assessment by densitometry. BMC, BMD, and tissue distribution measurements were made using DXA. Results were analyzed once each with software versions 3.4 and 3.6R. BMC + total soft tissue, measured using DXA, was comparable to measured body weight (3.4 = 76.3 kg; 3.6R - 76.5 kg; weight = 76.5 kg). Lower BMC and BMD (5.5{\%} and 1.8{\%}, P < 0.01) were observed with 3.6R. Arm tissue mass was lower (1,530 g; P < 0.01) and fat declined (1,069 g; P < 0.01) with 3.6R. Leg tissue mass decreased 487 g (P < 0.01), but fat tissue increased (526 g, P < 0.01) with 3.6R. A larger fat mass (1,492 g) and lower lean mass (1,115 g) were observed with 3.6R compared with 3.4. Percent fat values by densitometry using DXA 3.4 and 3.6R were 38.1{\%}, 39.9, and 41.9{\%}, respectively. These results demonstrated differences in total body composition, lean and fat tissue distribution, and bone measurements from DXA software versions.",
keywords = "BONE MINERAL CONTENT, BONE MINERAL DENSITY, DUAL ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY, SOFTWARE VERSIONS",
author = "{Van Loan}, {M. D.} and Keim, {N. L.} and K. Berg and Mayclin, {P. L.}",
year = "1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "587--591",
journal = "Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise",
issn = "0195-9131",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of body composition by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry and two different software packages

AU - Van Loan, M. D.

AU - Keim, N. L.

AU - Berg, K.

AU - Mayclin, P. L.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures body composition, tissue distribution, bone mineral content (BMC), and bone mineral density (BMD). Differences are possible due to software versions. This investigation examined body composition, tissue distribution, BMC, and BMD measurements using a DXA (Lunar Corp., Madison, WI) with different software packages (versions 3.4 and 3,6R). Fifteen women, ages 20-40 yr, enrolled in a weight- loss study (body mass index = 28) and volunteered for body composition assessment by densitometry. BMC, BMD, and tissue distribution measurements were made using DXA. Results were analyzed once each with software versions 3.4 and 3.6R. BMC + total soft tissue, measured using DXA, was comparable to measured body weight (3.4 = 76.3 kg; 3.6R - 76.5 kg; weight = 76.5 kg). Lower BMC and BMD (5.5% and 1.8%, P < 0.01) were observed with 3.6R. Arm tissue mass was lower (1,530 g; P < 0.01) and fat declined (1,069 g; P < 0.01) with 3.6R. Leg tissue mass decreased 487 g (P < 0.01), but fat tissue increased (526 g, P < 0.01) with 3.6R. A larger fat mass (1,492 g) and lower lean mass (1,115 g) were observed with 3.6R compared with 3.4. Percent fat values by densitometry using DXA 3.4 and 3.6R were 38.1%, 39.9, and 41.9%, respectively. These results demonstrated differences in total body composition, lean and fat tissue distribution, and bone measurements from DXA software versions.

AB - Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measures body composition, tissue distribution, bone mineral content (BMC), and bone mineral density (BMD). Differences are possible due to software versions. This investigation examined body composition, tissue distribution, BMC, and BMD measurements using a DXA (Lunar Corp., Madison, WI) with different software packages (versions 3.4 and 3,6R). Fifteen women, ages 20-40 yr, enrolled in a weight- loss study (body mass index = 28) and volunteered for body composition assessment by densitometry. BMC, BMD, and tissue distribution measurements were made using DXA. Results were analyzed once each with software versions 3.4 and 3.6R. BMC + total soft tissue, measured using DXA, was comparable to measured body weight (3.4 = 76.3 kg; 3.6R - 76.5 kg; weight = 76.5 kg). Lower BMC and BMD (5.5% and 1.8%, P < 0.01) were observed with 3.6R. Arm tissue mass was lower (1,530 g; P < 0.01) and fat declined (1,069 g; P < 0.01) with 3.6R. Leg tissue mass decreased 487 g (P < 0.01), but fat tissue increased (526 g, P < 0.01) with 3.6R. A larger fat mass (1,492 g) and lower lean mass (1,115 g) were observed with 3.6R compared with 3.4. Percent fat values by densitometry using DXA 3.4 and 3.6R were 38.1%, 39.9, and 41.9%, respectively. These results demonstrated differences in total body composition, lean and fat tissue distribution, and bone measurements from DXA software versions.

KW - BONE MINERAL CONTENT

KW - BONE MINERAL DENSITY

KW - DUAL ENERGY X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY

KW - SOFTWARE VERSIONS

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028943008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028943008&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7791591

AN - SCOPUS:0028943008

VL - 27

SP - 587

EP - 591

JO - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

JF - Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

SN - 0195-9131

IS - 4

ER -