Estimating the Degree of Emergency Department Overcrowding in Academic Medical Centers

Results of the National ED Overcrowding Study (NEDOCS)

Steven J. Weiss, Robert Derlet, Jeanine Arndahl, Amy A. Ernst, John R Richards, Madonna Fernández-Frankelton, Robert Schwab, Thomas O. Stair, Peter Vicellio, David Levy, Mark Brautigan, Ashira Johnson, Todd G. Nick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

173 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: No single universal definition of emergency department (ED) overcrowding exists. The authors hypothesize that a previously developed site-sampling form for academic ED overcrowding is a valid model to quantify overcrowding in academic institutions and can be used to develop a validated short form that correlates with overcrowding. Methods: A 23-question site-sampling form was designed based on input from academic physicians at eight medical schools representative of academic EDs nationwide. A total of 336 site-samplings at eight academic medical centers were conducted at 42 computer-generated random times over a three-week period by independent observers at each site. These sampling times ranged from very slow to severely overcrowded. The outcome variable was the degree of overcrowding as assessed by the charge nurse and ED physicians. The full model consisted of objective data that were obtained by counting the number of patients, determining patients' waiting times, and obtaining information from registration, triage, and ancillary services. Specific objective data were indexed to site-specific demographics. The outcome and objective data were compared using a multiple linear regression to determine predictive validity of the full model. A five-question reduced model was calculated using a backward stepdown procedure. Predictive validity and relationships between the outcome and objective data were assessed using a mixed-effects linear regression model, treating center as random effect. Results: Overcrowding occurred 12% to 73% of the time (mean, 35%), with two hospitals being overcrowded more than 50% of the time. Comparison of objective and outcome data resulted in an R2 of 0.49 (p < 0.001), indicating a good degree of predictive validity. A reduced five-question model predicted the full model with 88% accuracy. Conclusions: Overcrowding varied widely between academic centers during the study period. Results of a five-question reduced model are valid and accurate in predicting the degree of overcrowding in academic centers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)38-50
Number of pages13
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume11
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2004

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Linear Models
Supervisory Nursing
Physicians
Triage
Medical Schools
Demography

Keywords

  • ED management
  • Overcrowding

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Estimating the Degree of Emergency Department Overcrowding in Academic Medical Centers : Results of the National ED Overcrowding Study (NEDOCS). / Weiss, Steven J.; Derlet, Robert; Arndahl, Jeanine; Ernst, Amy A.; Richards, John R; Fernández-Frankelton, Madonna; Schwab, Robert; Stair, Thomas O.; Vicellio, Peter; Levy, David; Brautigan, Mark; Johnson, Ashira; Nick, Todd G.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 11, No. 1, 01.2004, p. 38-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weiss, SJ, Derlet, R, Arndahl, J, Ernst, AA, Richards, JR, Fernández-Frankelton, M, Schwab, R, Stair, TO, Vicellio, P, Levy, D, Brautigan, M, Johnson, A & Nick, TG 2004, 'Estimating the Degree of Emergency Department Overcrowding in Academic Medical Centers: Results of the National ED Overcrowding Study (NEDOCS)', Academic Emergency Medicine, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 38-50. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2003.07.017
Weiss, Steven J. ; Derlet, Robert ; Arndahl, Jeanine ; Ernst, Amy A. ; Richards, John R ; Fernández-Frankelton, Madonna ; Schwab, Robert ; Stair, Thomas O. ; Vicellio, Peter ; Levy, David ; Brautigan, Mark ; Johnson, Ashira ; Nick, Todd G. / Estimating the Degree of Emergency Department Overcrowding in Academic Medical Centers : Results of the National ED Overcrowding Study (NEDOCS). In: Academic Emergency Medicine. 2004 ; Vol. 11, No. 1. pp. 38-50.
@article{be2019aed0ab466fb314b46ace0a89c4,
title = "Estimating the Degree of Emergency Department Overcrowding in Academic Medical Centers: Results of the National ED Overcrowding Study (NEDOCS)",
abstract = "Objectives: No single universal definition of emergency department (ED) overcrowding exists. The authors hypothesize that a previously developed site-sampling form for academic ED overcrowding is a valid model to quantify overcrowding in academic institutions and can be used to develop a validated short form that correlates with overcrowding. Methods: A 23-question site-sampling form was designed based on input from academic physicians at eight medical schools representative of academic EDs nationwide. A total of 336 site-samplings at eight academic medical centers were conducted at 42 computer-generated random times over a three-week period by independent observers at each site. These sampling times ranged from very slow to severely overcrowded. The outcome variable was the degree of overcrowding as assessed by the charge nurse and ED physicians. The full model consisted of objective data that were obtained by counting the number of patients, determining patients' waiting times, and obtaining information from registration, triage, and ancillary services. Specific objective data were indexed to site-specific demographics. The outcome and objective data were compared using a multiple linear regression to determine predictive validity of the full model. A five-question reduced model was calculated using a backward stepdown procedure. Predictive validity and relationships between the outcome and objective data were assessed using a mixed-effects linear regression model, treating center as random effect. Results: Overcrowding occurred 12{\%} to 73{\%} of the time (mean, 35{\%}), with two hospitals being overcrowded more than 50{\%} of the time. Comparison of objective and outcome data resulted in an R2 of 0.49 (p < 0.001), indicating a good degree of predictive validity. A reduced five-question model predicted the full model with 88{\%} accuracy. Conclusions: Overcrowding varied widely between academic centers during the study period. Results of a five-question reduced model are valid and accurate in predicting the degree of overcrowding in academic centers.",
keywords = "ED management, Overcrowding",
author = "Weiss, {Steven J.} and Robert Derlet and Jeanine Arndahl and Ernst, {Amy A.} and Richards, {John R} and Madonna Fern{\'a}ndez-Frankelton and Robert Schwab and Stair, {Thomas O.} and Peter Vicellio and David Levy and Mark Brautigan and Ashira Johnson and Nick, {Todd G.}",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1197/j.aem.2003.07.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "11",
pages = "38--50",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating the Degree of Emergency Department Overcrowding in Academic Medical Centers

T2 - Results of the National ED Overcrowding Study (NEDOCS)

AU - Weiss, Steven J.

AU - Derlet, Robert

AU - Arndahl, Jeanine

AU - Ernst, Amy A.

AU - Richards, John R

AU - Fernández-Frankelton, Madonna

AU - Schwab, Robert

AU - Stair, Thomas O.

AU - Vicellio, Peter

AU - Levy, David

AU - Brautigan, Mark

AU - Johnson, Ashira

AU - Nick, Todd G.

PY - 2004/1

Y1 - 2004/1

N2 - Objectives: No single universal definition of emergency department (ED) overcrowding exists. The authors hypothesize that a previously developed site-sampling form for academic ED overcrowding is a valid model to quantify overcrowding in academic institutions and can be used to develop a validated short form that correlates with overcrowding. Methods: A 23-question site-sampling form was designed based on input from academic physicians at eight medical schools representative of academic EDs nationwide. A total of 336 site-samplings at eight academic medical centers were conducted at 42 computer-generated random times over a three-week period by independent observers at each site. These sampling times ranged from very slow to severely overcrowded. The outcome variable was the degree of overcrowding as assessed by the charge nurse and ED physicians. The full model consisted of objective data that were obtained by counting the number of patients, determining patients' waiting times, and obtaining information from registration, triage, and ancillary services. Specific objective data were indexed to site-specific demographics. The outcome and objective data were compared using a multiple linear regression to determine predictive validity of the full model. A five-question reduced model was calculated using a backward stepdown procedure. Predictive validity and relationships between the outcome and objective data were assessed using a mixed-effects linear regression model, treating center as random effect. Results: Overcrowding occurred 12% to 73% of the time (mean, 35%), with two hospitals being overcrowded more than 50% of the time. Comparison of objective and outcome data resulted in an R2 of 0.49 (p < 0.001), indicating a good degree of predictive validity. A reduced five-question model predicted the full model with 88% accuracy. Conclusions: Overcrowding varied widely between academic centers during the study period. Results of a five-question reduced model are valid and accurate in predicting the degree of overcrowding in academic centers.

AB - Objectives: No single universal definition of emergency department (ED) overcrowding exists. The authors hypothesize that a previously developed site-sampling form for academic ED overcrowding is a valid model to quantify overcrowding in academic institutions and can be used to develop a validated short form that correlates with overcrowding. Methods: A 23-question site-sampling form was designed based on input from academic physicians at eight medical schools representative of academic EDs nationwide. A total of 336 site-samplings at eight academic medical centers were conducted at 42 computer-generated random times over a three-week period by independent observers at each site. These sampling times ranged from very slow to severely overcrowded. The outcome variable was the degree of overcrowding as assessed by the charge nurse and ED physicians. The full model consisted of objective data that were obtained by counting the number of patients, determining patients' waiting times, and obtaining information from registration, triage, and ancillary services. Specific objective data were indexed to site-specific demographics. The outcome and objective data were compared using a multiple linear regression to determine predictive validity of the full model. A five-question reduced model was calculated using a backward stepdown procedure. Predictive validity and relationships between the outcome and objective data were assessed using a mixed-effects linear regression model, treating center as random effect. Results: Overcrowding occurred 12% to 73% of the time (mean, 35%), with two hospitals being overcrowded more than 50% of the time. Comparison of objective and outcome data resulted in an R2 of 0.49 (p < 0.001), indicating a good degree of predictive validity. A reduced five-question model predicted the full model with 88% accuracy. Conclusions: Overcrowding varied widely between academic centers during the study period. Results of a five-question reduced model are valid and accurate in predicting the degree of overcrowding in academic centers.

KW - ED management

KW - Overcrowding

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=9144225550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=9144225550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/j.aem.2003.07.017

DO - 10.1197/j.aem.2003.07.017

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 38

EP - 50

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 1

ER -