Estimating sizes of wild pig populations in the North and Central Coast regions of California

Richard A. Sweitzer, Dirk Van Vuren, Ian Gardner, Walter M Boyce, John D. Waithman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We developed a mark-sighting approach with automatic camera systems and assessed the size and density of wild pig (Sus scrofa) populations in the North and Central Coast regions of California in 1994 and 1995. Eighty and 149 wild pigs were captured and tagged at 4 and 6 study sites in 1994 and 1995, respectively. Of those animals, 202 (88%) were subsequently sighted among over 3,000 photographs of wild pigs obtained from 54 camera stations. Sighting rates for both tagged and nontagged wild pigs were similar between years and averaged 2.8 ± 0.5 and 2.8 ± 0.4 wild pigs/camera-station night, respectively. Sighting rates for all wild pigs during the study averaged 5.7 ± 0.8 wild pigs/camera-station night. Mark-sighting data analyzed with program NOREMARK provided estimates of population size, and narrow 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for most research sites suggested we obtained sufficient sightings for reliable estimates of size of populations. It also proved possible to identify nontagged wild pigs in photographs for determining minimum population sizes, and the 95% CI from mark-sighting estimates encompassed the minimum population sizes for 8 of 10 study sites. An important factor influencing the reliability of population estimates was the proportion of tagged animals resighted. At one site where few tagged animals were sighted, 95% CIs were large and did not encompass the minimum population estimate. Mean population densities ranged from 0.7 to 3.8 wild pigs/km2, comparable to previous research on wild pigs in the regions we studied. Densities increased from 1994 to 1995, potentially related to higher rainfall and increased forage availability in 1995. Also, densities were lower in areas with relatively high hunting pressure, suggesting that sport bunting may be effective at reducing wild pigs numbers in some areas.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)531-543
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Wildlife Management
Volume64
Issue number2
StatePublished - Apr 2000

Fingerprint

pig
coasts
swine
coast
cameras
population size
confidence interval
photographs
photograph
animal
animals
Sus scrofa
sports
sport
hunting
forage
population density
rain
rainfall

Keywords

  • California
  • Density
  • Feral pigs
  • Mark-recapture
  • Mark-sight
  • Population size
  • Serum progesterone levels
  • Sus scrofa, TrailMaster® camera systems
  • Wild hogs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Ecology

Cite this

Estimating sizes of wild pig populations in the North and Central Coast regions of California. / Sweitzer, Richard A.; Van Vuren, Dirk; Gardner, Ian; Boyce, Walter M; Waithman, John D.

In: Journal of Wildlife Management, Vol. 64, No. 2, 04.2000, p. 531-543.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Sweitzer, Richard A. ; Van Vuren, Dirk ; Gardner, Ian ; Boyce, Walter M ; Waithman, John D. / Estimating sizes of wild pig populations in the North and Central Coast regions of California. In: Journal of Wildlife Management. 2000 ; Vol. 64, No. 2. pp. 531-543.
@article{cf12c92e405847cf8ff2dcdf4ba912f0,
title = "Estimating sizes of wild pig populations in the North and Central Coast regions of California",
abstract = "We developed a mark-sighting approach with automatic camera systems and assessed the size and density of wild pig (Sus scrofa) populations in the North and Central Coast regions of California in 1994 and 1995. Eighty and 149 wild pigs were captured and tagged at 4 and 6 study sites in 1994 and 1995, respectively. Of those animals, 202 (88{\%}) were subsequently sighted among over 3,000 photographs of wild pigs obtained from 54 camera stations. Sighting rates for both tagged and nontagged wild pigs were similar between years and averaged 2.8 ± 0.5 and 2.8 ± 0.4 wild pigs/camera-station night, respectively. Sighting rates for all wild pigs during the study averaged 5.7 ± 0.8 wild pigs/camera-station night. Mark-sighting data analyzed with program NOREMARK provided estimates of population size, and narrow 95{\%} confidence intervals (95{\%} CI) for most research sites suggested we obtained sufficient sightings for reliable estimates of size of populations. It also proved possible to identify nontagged wild pigs in photographs for determining minimum population sizes, and the 95{\%} CI from mark-sighting estimates encompassed the minimum population sizes for 8 of 10 study sites. An important factor influencing the reliability of population estimates was the proportion of tagged animals resighted. At one site where few tagged animals were sighted, 95{\%} CIs were large and did not encompass the minimum population estimate. Mean population densities ranged from 0.7 to 3.8 wild pigs/km2, comparable to previous research on wild pigs in the regions we studied. Densities increased from 1994 to 1995, potentially related to higher rainfall and increased forage availability in 1995. Also, densities were lower in areas with relatively high hunting pressure, suggesting that sport bunting may be effective at reducing wild pigs numbers in some areas.",
keywords = "California, Density, Feral pigs, Mark-recapture, Mark-sight, Population size, Serum progesterone levels, Sus scrofa, TrailMaster{\circledR} camera systems, Wild hogs",
author = "Sweitzer, {Richard A.} and {Van Vuren}, Dirk and Ian Gardner and Boyce, {Walter M} and Waithman, {John D.}",
year = "2000",
month = "4",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "531--543",
journal = "Journal of Wildlife Management",
issn = "0022-541X",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating sizes of wild pig populations in the North and Central Coast regions of California

AU - Sweitzer, Richard A.

AU - Van Vuren, Dirk

AU - Gardner, Ian

AU - Boyce, Walter M

AU - Waithman, John D.

PY - 2000/4

Y1 - 2000/4

N2 - We developed a mark-sighting approach with automatic camera systems and assessed the size and density of wild pig (Sus scrofa) populations in the North and Central Coast regions of California in 1994 and 1995. Eighty and 149 wild pigs were captured and tagged at 4 and 6 study sites in 1994 and 1995, respectively. Of those animals, 202 (88%) were subsequently sighted among over 3,000 photographs of wild pigs obtained from 54 camera stations. Sighting rates for both tagged and nontagged wild pigs were similar between years and averaged 2.8 ± 0.5 and 2.8 ± 0.4 wild pigs/camera-station night, respectively. Sighting rates for all wild pigs during the study averaged 5.7 ± 0.8 wild pigs/camera-station night. Mark-sighting data analyzed with program NOREMARK provided estimates of population size, and narrow 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for most research sites suggested we obtained sufficient sightings for reliable estimates of size of populations. It also proved possible to identify nontagged wild pigs in photographs for determining minimum population sizes, and the 95% CI from mark-sighting estimates encompassed the minimum population sizes for 8 of 10 study sites. An important factor influencing the reliability of population estimates was the proportion of tagged animals resighted. At one site where few tagged animals were sighted, 95% CIs were large and did not encompass the minimum population estimate. Mean population densities ranged from 0.7 to 3.8 wild pigs/km2, comparable to previous research on wild pigs in the regions we studied. Densities increased from 1994 to 1995, potentially related to higher rainfall and increased forage availability in 1995. Also, densities were lower in areas with relatively high hunting pressure, suggesting that sport bunting may be effective at reducing wild pigs numbers in some areas.

AB - We developed a mark-sighting approach with automatic camera systems and assessed the size and density of wild pig (Sus scrofa) populations in the North and Central Coast regions of California in 1994 and 1995. Eighty and 149 wild pigs were captured and tagged at 4 and 6 study sites in 1994 and 1995, respectively. Of those animals, 202 (88%) were subsequently sighted among over 3,000 photographs of wild pigs obtained from 54 camera stations. Sighting rates for both tagged and nontagged wild pigs were similar between years and averaged 2.8 ± 0.5 and 2.8 ± 0.4 wild pigs/camera-station night, respectively. Sighting rates for all wild pigs during the study averaged 5.7 ± 0.8 wild pigs/camera-station night. Mark-sighting data analyzed with program NOREMARK provided estimates of population size, and narrow 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for most research sites suggested we obtained sufficient sightings for reliable estimates of size of populations. It also proved possible to identify nontagged wild pigs in photographs for determining minimum population sizes, and the 95% CI from mark-sighting estimates encompassed the minimum population sizes for 8 of 10 study sites. An important factor influencing the reliability of population estimates was the proportion of tagged animals resighted. At one site where few tagged animals were sighted, 95% CIs were large and did not encompass the minimum population estimate. Mean population densities ranged from 0.7 to 3.8 wild pigs/km2, comparable to previous research on wild pigs in the regions we studied. Densities increased from 1994 to 1995, potentially related to higher rainfall and increased forage availability in 1995. Also, densities were lower in areas with relatively high hunting pressure, suggesting that sport bunting may be effective at reducing wild pigs numbers in some areas.

KW - California

KW - Density

KW - Feral pigs

KW - Mark-recapture

KW - Mark-sight

KW - Population size

KW - Serum progesterone levels

KW - Sus scrofa, TrailMaster® camera systems

KW - Wild hogs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033999439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033999439&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033999439

VL - 64

SP - 531

EP - 543

JO - Journal of Wildlife Management

JF - Journal of Wildlife Management

SN - 0022-541X

IS - 2

ER -