Estimating reading growth using intermittent CBM progress monitoring

Joseph R. Jenkins, J. Jason Graff, Diana L Miglioretti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study addressed three basic questions involving the amount of measurement needed to obtain valid estimates of reading growth. Participants were 41 students with learning disabilities from Grades 3 to 8, monitored across 10 weeks using curriculum-based measurement (CBM) of words read correctly (WRC). We compared growth slopes based on measurements taken weekly, every 2 weeks, every 3 weeks, every 4 weeks, and every 9 weeks to an estimate of "true slope. " Results showed that frequency of progress monitoring could be significantly reduced without detracting from the validity of growth estimates. However, validity was negatively affected by minimizing the number of WRC scores collected at each measurement occasion and by employing only one rather than four scores to estimate baseline.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)151-163
Number of pages13
JournalExceptional Children
Volume75
Issue number2
StatePublished - Dec 2009
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Curriculum
Reading
monitoring
curriculum
Growth
Learning Disorders
learning disability
Students
school grade
student

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Education

Cite this

Estimating reading growth using intermittent CBM progress monitoring. / Jenkins, Joseph R.; Graff, J. Jason; Miglioretti, Diana L.

In: Exceptional Children, Vol. 75, No. 2, 12.2009, p. 151-163.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jenkins, Joseph R. ; Graff, J. Jason ; Miglioretti, Diana L. / Estimating reading growth using intermittent CBM progress monitoring. In: Exceptional Children. 2009 ; Vol. 75, No. 2. pp. 151-163.
@article{066217bedaae41f7a53f581d8aa5c29e,
title = "Estimating reading growth using intermittent CBM progress monitoring",
abstract = "This study addressed three basic questions involving the amount of measurement needed to obtain valid estimates of reading growth. Participants were 41 students with learning disabilities from Grades 3 to 8, monitored across 10 weeks using curriculum-based measurement (CBM) of words read correctly (WRC). We compared growth slopes based on measurements taken weekly, every 2 weeks, every 3 weeks, every 4 weeks, and every 9 weeks to an estimate of {"}true slope. {"} Results showed that frequency of progress monitoring could be significantly reduced without detracting from the validity of growth estimates. However, validity was negatively affected by minimizing the number of WRC scores collected at each measurement occasion and by employing only one rather than four scores to estimate baseline.",
author = "Jenkins, {Joseph R.} and Graff, {J. Jason} and Miglioretti, {Diana L}",
year = "2009",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "75",
pages = "151--163",
journal = "Exceptional Children",
issn = "0014-4029",
publisher = "Council for Exceptional Children",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Estimating reading growth using intermittent CBM progress monitoring

AU - Jenkins, Joseph R.

AU - Graff, J. Jason

AU - Miglioretti, Diana L

PY - 2009/12

Y1 - 2009/12

N2 - This study addressed three basic questions involving the amount of measurement needed to obtain valid estimates of reading growth. Participants were 41 students with learning disabilities from Grades 3 to 8, monitored across 10 weeks using curriculum-based measurement (CBM) of words read correctly (WRC). We compared growth slopes based on measurements taken weekly, every 2 weeks, every 3 weeks, every 4 weeks, and every 9 weeks to an estimate of "true slope. " Results showed that frequency of progress monitoring could be significantly reduced without detracting from the validity of growth estimates. However, validity was negatively affected by minimizing the number of WRC scores collected at each measurement occasion and by employing only one rather than four scores to estimate baseline.

AB - This study addressed three basic questions involving the amount of measurement needed to obtain valid estimates of reading growth. Participants were 41 students with learning disabilities from Grades 3 to 8, monitored across 10 weeks using curriculum-based measurement (CBM) of words read correctly (WRC). We compared growth slopes based on measurements taken weekly, every 2 weeks, every 3 weeks, every 4 weeks, and every 9 weeks to an estimate of "true slope. " Results showed that frequency of progress monitoring could be significantly reduced without detracting from the validity of growth estimates. However, validity was negatively affected by minimizing the number of WRC scores collected at each measurement occasion and by employing only one rather than four scores to estimate baseline.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149327069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149327069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:58149327069

VL - 75

SP - 151

EP - 163

JO - Exceptional Children

JF - Exceptional Children

SN - 0014-4029

IS - 2

ER -