Epidural analgesia and previous Caesarean section

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A series of six cases of ruptured uterus occurred following previous lower segment Caesarean section, out of a total of 222 'trials of scar', is presented, and the literature reviewed in an attempt to clarify the term 'relative contra-indication' was applied to this clinical circumstance. The sypmtoms and signs of ruptured uterus likely to be blocked by an epidural, i.e. maternal tachycardia, scar tenderness and continuous lower abdominal pain, have been shown to be either unreliable (tachycardia and tenderness) or frequently not to occur at all (pain). When pain does occur it is not necessarily masked by an epidural. It is concluded that previous lower segment Caesarean section is not a contraindication to epidural analgesia in a subsequent labour provided certain conditions are fulfilled.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)336-341
Number of pages6
JournalAnaesthesia
Volume38
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1983
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Epidural Analgesia
Tachycardia
Cesarean Section
Uterus
Cicatrix
Pain
Abdominal Pain
Mothers

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Epidural analgesia and previous Caesarean section. / Uppington, Jeffrey.

In: Anaesthesia, Vol. 38, No. 4, 1983, p. 336-341.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{9b8e65577e5b48ae9189e3740fd04139,
title = "Epidural analgesia and previous Caesarean section",
abstract = "A series of six cases of ruptured uterus occurred following previous lower segment Caesarean section, out of a total of 222 'trials of scar', is presented, and the literature reviewed in an attempt to clarify the term 'relative contra-indication' was applied to this clinical circumstance. The sypmtoms and signs of ruptured uterus likely to be blocked by an epidural, i.e. maternal tachycardia, scar tenderness and continuous lower abdominal pain, have been shown to be either unreliable (tachycardia and tenderness) or frequently not to occur at all (pain). When pain does occur it is not necessarily masked by an epidural. It is concluded that previous lower segment Caesarean section is not a contraindication to epidural analgesia in a subsequent labour provided certain conditions are fulfilled.",
author = "Jeffrey Uppington",
year = "1983",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "336--341",
journal = "Anaesthesia",
issn = "0003-2409",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Epidural analgesia and previous Caesarean section

AU - Uppington, Jeffrey

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - A series of six cases of ruptured uterus occurred following previous lower segment Caesarean section, out of a total of 222 'trials of scar', is presented, and the literature reviewed in an attempt to clarify the term 'relative contra-indication' was applied to this clinical circumstance. The sypmtoms and signs of ruptured uterus likely to be blocked by an epidural, i.e. maternal tachycardia, scar tenderness and continuous lower abdominal pain, have been shown to be either unreliable (tachycardia and tenderness) or frequently not to occur at all (pain). When pain does occur it is not necessarily masked by an epidural. It is concluded that previous lower segment Caesarean section is not a contraindication to epidural analgesia in a subsequent labour provided certain conditions are fulfilled.

AB - A series of six cases of ruptured uterus occurred following previous lower segment Caesarean section, out of a total of 222 'trials of scar', is presented, and the literature reviewed in an attempt to clarify the term 'relative contra-indication' was applied to this clinical circumstance. The sypmtoms and signs of ruptured uterus likely to be blocked by an epidural, i.e. maternal tachycardia, scar tenderness and continuous lower abdominal pain, have been shown to be either unreliable (tachycardia and tenderness) or frequently not to occur at all (pain). When pain does occur it is not necessarily masked by an epidural. It is concluded that previous lower segment Caesarean section is not a contraindication to epidural analgesia in a subsequent labour provided certain conditions are fulfilled.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020567527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020567527&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 6846763

AN - SCOPUS:0020567527

VL - 38

SP - 336

EP - 341

JO - Anaesthesia

JF - Anaesthesia

SN - 0003-2409

IS - 4

ER -