Epidemiologic issues in the validation of veterinary diagnostic tests

M. Greiner, Ian Gardner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

319 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this review, we critically discuss the objectives, methods and limitations of different approaches for the validation of diagnostic tests. We show (based on published data and our own experiences) that estimates for the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity may vary among populations and/or subpopulations of animals, conditional on the distribution of influential covariates. Additional variability in those parameter estimates may be attributable to the sampling strategy. The uncertainty about diagnostic parameters is of concern for the decision-maker in the context of clinical diagnosis or quantitative risk assessment as well as for the epidemiologist who uses test data for prevalence estimation or risk-factor studies. Examples for the calculation of diagnostic parameters are presented together with bias-avoidance strategies. We suggest guidelines for an epidemiologic approach to test validation of veterinary diagnostic tests. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-22
Number of pages20
JournalPreventive Veterinary Medicine
Volume45
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - May 30 2000

Fingerprint

Routine Diagnostic Tests
diagnostic techniques
diagnostic specificity
diagnostic sensitivity
quantitative risk assessment
Uncertainty
risk factors
uncertainty
testing
Guidelines
Sensitivity and Specificity
Population
animals
sampling
methodology
Epidemiologists

Keywords

  • Bias
  • Diagnostic test
  • Sensitivity
  • Specificity
  • Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Epidemiologic issues in the validation of veterinary diagnostic tests. / Greiner, M.; Gardner, Ian.

In: Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Vol. 45, No. 1-2, 30.05.2000, p. 3-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{da42cf682e074cd480db31816d08034d,
title = "Epidemiologic issues in the validation of veterinary diagnostic tests",
abstract = "In this review, we critically discuss the objectives, methods and limitations of different approaches for the validation of diagnostic tests. We show (based on published data and our own experiences) that estimates for the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity may vary among populations and/or subpopulations of animals, conditional on the distribution of influential covariates. Additional variability in those parameter estimates may be attributable to the sampling strategy. The uncertainty about diagnostic parameters is of concern for the decision-maker in the context of clinical diagnosis or quantitative risk assessment as well as for the epidemiologist who uses test data for prevalence estimation or risk-factor studies. Examples for the calculation of diagnostic parameters are presented together with bias-avoidance strategies. We suggest guidelines for an epidemiologic approach to test validation of veterinary diagnostic tests. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.",
keywords = "Bias, Diagnostic test, Sensitivity, Specificity, Validation",
author = "M. Greiner and Ian Gardner",
year = "2000",
month = "5",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00114-8",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "45",
pages = "3--22",
journal = "Preventive Veterinary Medicine",
issn = "0167-5877",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Epidemiologic issues in the validation of veterinary diagnostic tests

AU - Greiner, M.

AU - Gardner, Ian

PY - 2000/5/30

Y1 - 2000/5/30

N2 - In this review, we critically discuss the objectives, methods and limitations of different approaches for the validation of diagnostic tests. We show (based on published data and our own experiences) that estimates for the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity may vary among populations and/or subpopulations of animals, conditional on the distribution of influential covariates. Additional variability in those parameter estimates may be attributable to the sampling strategy. The uncertainty about diagnostic parameters is of concern for the decision-maker in the context of clinical diagnosis or quantitative risk assessment as well as for the epidemiologist who uses test data for prevalence estimation or risk-factor studies. Examples for the calculation of diagnostic parameters are presented together with bias-avoidance strategies. We suggest guidelines for an epidemiologic approach to test validation of veterinary diagnostic tests. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

AB - In this review, we critically discuss the objectives, methods and limitations of different approaches for the validation of diagnostic tests. We show (based on published data and our own experiences) that estimates for the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity may vary among populations and/or subpopulations of animals, conditional on the distribution of influential covariates. Additional variability in those parameter estimates may be attributable to the sampling strategy. The uncertainty about diagnostic parameters is of concern for the decision-maker in the context of clinical diagnosis or quantitative risk assessment as well as for the epidemiologist who uses test data for prevalence estimation or risk-factor studies. Examples for the calculation of diagnostic parameters are presented together with bias-avoidance strategies. We suggest guidelines for an epidemiologic approach to test validation of veterinary diagnostic tests. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science B.V.

KW - Bias

KW - Diagnostic test

KW - Sensitivity

KW - Specificity

KW - Validation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034733007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034733007&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00114-8

DO - 10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00114-8

M3 - Article

C2 - 10802331

AN - SCOPUS:0034733007

VL - 45

SP - 3

EP - 22

JO - Preventive Veterinary Medicine

JF - Preventive Veterinary Medicine

SN - 0167-5877

IS - 1-2

ER -