Endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced hemorrhage

A study of risk factors and the role of epinephrine injection

Joseph Leung, F. K L Chan, J. J Y Sung, S. C S Chung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

106 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: We studied the incidence and relative risk factors for postsphincterotomy bleeding and the efficacy of epinephrine injection in hemostasis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of postsphincterotomy bleeding in 983 consecutive patients with sphincterotomy for common duct stones and risk factors for such bleeding, i.e., presence of coagulopathy, stone impaction, periampullary diverticulum, extension of previous sphincterotomy, and use of needle knife precut sphincterotomy in sphincterotomy-induced bleeding. Epinephrine irrigation was performed for mild bleeding, and injection with 1:10,000 epinephrine was performed to control more severe bleeding. Results: 119 patients (12.1%) developed postsphincterotomy bleeding; 114 patients had immediate bleeding and 5 had delayed hemorrhage. Stone impaction at the papilla, periampullary diverticulum, and extension of a previous sphincterotomy were independent variables that increased the risk of bleeding. Forty-six percent of 119 patients with mild bleeding responded to epinephrine irrigation. The remaining required injection therapy with 1:10,000 epinephrine. Initial hemostasis was achieved in all. Rebleeding occurred in 5 patients but all responded to conservative management. None required emergency surgery and there was no mortality related to uncontrolled hemorrhage. Conclusion: Epinephrine injection is a safe treatment for sphincterotomy-induced bleeding.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)550-554
Number of pages5
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume42
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Endoscopic Sphincterotomy
Epinephrine
Hemorrhage
Injections
Diverticulum
Hemostasis
Incidence
Needles

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced hemorrhage : A study of risk factors and the role of epinephrine injection. / Leung, Joseph; Chan, F. K L; Sung, J. J Y; Chung, S. C S.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 42, No. 6, 1995, p. 550-554.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{f41fe3aa4cbd47679f41735c90194caa,
title = "Endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced hemorrhage: A study of risk factors and the role of epinephrine injection",
abstract = "Background: We studied the incidence and relative risk factors for postsphincterotomy bleeding and the efficacy of epinephrine injection in hemostasis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of postsphincterotomy bleeding in 983 consecutive patients with sphincterotomy for common duct stones and risk factors for such bleeding, i.e., presence of coagulopathy, stone impaction, periampullary diverticulum, extension of previous sphincterotomy, and use of needle knife precut sphincterotomy in sphincterotomy-induced bleeding. Epinephrine irrigation was performed for mild bleeding, and injection with 1:10,000 epinephrine was performed to control more severe bleeding. Results: 119 patients (12.1{\%}) developed postsphincterotomy bleeding; 114 patients had immediate bleeding and 5 had delayed hemorrhage. Stone impaction at the papilla, periampullary diverticulum, and extension of a previous sphincterotomy were independent variables that increased the risk of bleeding. Forty-six percent of 119 patients with mild bleeding responded to epinephrine irrigation. The remaining required injection therapy with 1:10,000 epinephrine. Initial hemostasis was achieved in all. Rebleeding occurred in 5 patients but all responded to conservative management. None required emergency surgery and there was no mortality related to uncontrolled hemorrhage. Conclusion: Epinephrine injection is a safe treatment for sphincterotomy-induced bleeding.",
author = "Joseph Leung and Chan, {F. K L} and Sung, {J. J Y} and Chung, {S. C S}",
year = "1995",
doi = "10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70009-9",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "42",
pages = "550--554",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced hemorrhage

T2 - A study of risk factors and the role of epinephrine injection

AU - Leung, Joseph

AU - Chan, F. K L

AU - Sung, J. J Y

AU - Chung, S. C S

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - Background: We studied the incidence and relative risk factors for postsphincterotomy bleeding and the efficacy of epinephrine injection in hemostasis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of postsphincterotomy bleeding in 983 consecutive patients with sphincterotomy for common duct stones and risk factors for such bleeding, i.e., presence of coagulopathy, stone impaction, periampullary diverticulum, extension of previous sphincterotomy, and use of needle knife precut sphincterotomy in sphincterotomy-induced bleeding. Epinephrine irrigation was performed for mild bleeding, and injection with 1:10,000 epinephrine was performed to control more severe bleeding. Results: 119 patients (12.1%) developed postsphincterotomy bleeding; 114 patients had immediate bleeding and 5 had delayed hemorrhage. Stone impaction at the papilla, periampullary diverticulum, and extension of a previous sphincterotomy were independent variables that increased the risk of bleeding. Forty-six percent of 119 patients with mild bleeding responded to epinephrine irrigation. The remaining required injection therapy with 1:10,000 epinephrine. Initial hemostasis was achieved in all. Rebleeding occurred in 5 patients but all responded to conservative management. None required emergency surgery and there was no mortality related to uncontrolled hemorrhage. Conclusion: Epinephrine injection is a safe treatment for sphincterotomy-induced bleeding.

AB - Background: We studied the incidence and relative risk factors for postsphincterotomy bleeding and the efficacy of epinephrine injection in hemostasis. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the incidence of postsphincterotomy bleeding in 983 consecutive patients with sphincterotomy for common duct stones and risk factors for such bleeding, i.e., presence of coagulopathy, stone impaction, periampullary diverticulum, extension of previous sphincterotomy, and use of needle knife precut sphincterotomy in sphincterotomy-induced bleeding. Epinephrine irrigation was performed for mild bleeding, and injection with 1:10,000 epinephrine was performed to control more severe bleeding. Results: 119 patients (12.1%) developed postsphincterotomy bleeding; 114 patients had immediate bleeding and 5 had delayed hemorrhage. Stone impaction at the papilla, periampullary diverticulum, and extension of a previous sphincterotomy were independent variables that increased the risk of bleeding. Forty-six percent of 119 patients with mild bleeding responded to epinephrine irrigation. The remaining required injection therapy with 1:10,000 epinephrine. Initial hemostasis was achieved in all. Rebleeding occurred in 5 patients but all responded to conservative management. None required emergency surgery and there was no mortality related to uncontrolled hemorrhage. Conclusion: Epinephrine injection is a safe treatment for sphincterotomy-induced bleeding.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028855966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028855966&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70009-9

DO - 10.1016/S0016-5107(95)70009-9

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 550

EP - 554

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 6

ER -