End of life in the pediatric burn patient

Michael Shay O'Mara, Debbie Chapyak, David G Greenhalgh, Tina L Palmieri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Up to 60% of deaths in pediatric intensive care units occur after placing limits upon life-sustaining treatment. Two-thirds of limitations are made on the last day of life. Our aim was to characterize the timing, indications, and implementation of "do not resuscitate" (DNR) orders and the withdrawal of support from children with severe burns. A retrospective evaluation was conducted of all deaths in a pediatric burn unit over a 7-year period. Values are presented as mean ± SD; two-tailed t-tests and Fisher's exact tests were used for analysis. Of the 29 deaths (total admissions = 1261; 2.3% death rate), 12 were of patients with DNR status. Active withdrawal of support occurred for 15 patients: 10 with DNR orders, 5 without. There was no difference in age, burn size, inhalation injury, etiology of injury, cause of death, intensive care unit days, or ventilator days between DNR patients and non-DNR patients. Of the 12 patients with DNR status, only five had orders indicating no cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), no vasopressors, and no cardioversion. The mean time from DNR to death was 22.9 ± 49.6 hours (median, 2.75 hours). Patients without DNR orders before death had more CPR attempts (0.8 ± 0.6 vs. 0.3 ± 0.6; P < .05). At the time of death, few patients with DNR orders were receiving vasopressors (two patients) or underwent CPR (1 patient). Of the 17 patients without DNR orders, 12 underwent resuscitative efforts: CPR (11), vasopressors (12), or cardioversion (9). No resuscitative efforts were undertaken for four children, two with DNR orders. For the acutely injured child there is a strong tendency to wait until the last possible hours of life to address limitation of life-sustaining measures. Documentation of limitation of care was not previously addressed in nearly a third of cases in which support was actively withdrawn. Once a decision to limit support was made, the majority of children proceeded rapidly to death. Further evaluation of the indications, timing, and implementation of DNR orders for children with severe burns is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)803-808
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Burn Care and Research
Volume27
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2006

Fingerprint

Resuscitation Orders
Pediatrics
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
Electric Countershock
Burns
Inhalation Burns
Burn Units
Pediatric Intensive Care Units
Wounds and Injuries
Mechanical Ventilators
Documentation
Intensive Care Units
Cause of Death
Mortality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine
  • Rehabilitation
  • Surgery

Cite this

End of life in the pediatric burn patient. / O'Mara, Michael Shay; Chapyak, Debbie; Greenhalgh, David G; Palmieri, Tina L.

In: Journal of Burn Care and Research, Vol. 27, No. 6, 11.2006, p. 803-808.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

O'Mara, Michael Shay ; Chapyak, Debbie ; Greenhalgh, David G ; Palmieri, Tina L. / End of life in the pediatric burn patient. In: Journal of Burn Care and Research. 2006 ; Vol. 27, No. 6. pp. 803-808.
@article{4454661f717244978bb2010a6bc8f88e,
title = "End of life in the pediatric burn patient",
abstract = "Up to 60{\%} of deaths in pediatric intensive care units occur after placing limits upon life-sustaining treatment. Two-thirds of limitations are made on the last day of life. Our aim was to characterize the timing, indications, and implementation of {"}do not resuscitate{"} (DNR) orders and the withdrawal of support from children with severe burns. A retrospective evaluation was conducted of all deaths in a pediatric burn unit over a 7-year period. Values are presented as mean ± SD; two-tailed t-tests and Fisher's exact tests were used for analysis. Of the 29 deaths (total admissions = 1261; 2.3{\%} death rate), 12 were of patients with DNR status. Active withdrawal of support occurred for 15 patients: 10 with DNR orders, 5 without. There was no difference in age, burn size, inhalation injury, etiology of injury, cause of death, intensive care unit days, or ventilator days between DNR patients and non-DNR patients. Of the 12 patients with DNR status, only five had orders indicating no cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), no vasopressors, and no cardioversion. The mean time from DNR to death was 22.9 ± 49.6 hours (median, 2.75 hours). Patients without DNR orders before death had more CPR attempts (0.8 ± 0.6 vs. 0.3 ± 0.6; P < .05). At the time of death, few patients with DNR orders were receiving vasopressors (two patients) or underwent CPR (1 patient). Of the 17 patients without DNR orders, 12 underwent resuscitative efforts: CPR (11), vasopressors (12), or cardioversion (9). No resuscitative efforts were undertaken for four children, two with DNR orders. For the acutely injured child there is a strong tendency to wait until the last possible hours of life to address limitation of life-sustaining measures. Documentation of limitation of care was not previously addressed in nearly a third of cases in which support was actively withdrawn. Once a decision to limit support was made, the majority of children proceeded rapidly to death. Further evaluation of the indications, timing, and implementation of DNR orders for children with severe burns is warranted.",
author = "O'Mara, {Michael Shay} and Debbie Chapyak and Greenhalgh, {David G} and Palmieri, {Tina L}",
year = "2006",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1097/01.BCR.0000245436.06218.95",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "27",
pages = "803--808",
journal = "Journal of Burn Care and Research",
issn = "1559-047X",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - End of life in the pediatric burn patient

AU - O'Mara, Michael Shay

AU - Chapyak, Debbie

AU - Greenhalgh, David G

AU - Palmieri, Tina L

PY - 2006/11

Y1 - 2006/11

N2 - Up to 60% of deaths in pediatric intensive care units occur after placing limits upon life-sustaining treatment. Two-thirds of limitations are made on the last day of life. Our aim was to characterize the timing, indications, and implementation of "do not resuscitate" (DNR) orders and the withdrawal of support from children with severe burns. A retrospective evaluation was conducted of all deaths in a pediatric burn unit over a 7-year period. Values are presented as mean ± SD; two-tailed t-tests and Fisher's exact tests were used for analysis. Of the 29 deaths (total admissions = 1261; 2.3% death rate), 12 were of patients with DNR status. Active withdrawal of support occurred for 15 patients: 10 with DNR orders, 5 without. There was no difference in age, burn size, inhalation injury, etiology of injury, cause of death, intensive care unit days, or ventilator days between DNR patients and non-DNR patients. Of the 12 patients with DNR status, only five had orders indicating no cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), no vasopressors, and no cardioversion. The mean time from DNR to death was 22.9 ± 49.6 hours (median, 2.75 hours). Patients without DNR orders before death had more CPR attempts (0.8 ± 0.6 vs. 0.3 ± 0.6; P < .05). At the time of death, few patients with DNR orders were receiving vasopressors (two patients) or underwent CPR (1 patient). Of the 17 patients without DNR orders, 12 underwent resuscitative efforts: CPR (11), vasopressors (12), or cardioversion (9). No resuscitative efforts were undertaken for four children, two with DNR orders. For the acutely injured child there is a strong tendency to wait until the last possible hours of life to address limitation of life-sustaining measures. Documentation of limitation of care was not previously addressed in nearly a third of cases in which support was actively withdrawn. Once a decision to limit support was made, the majority of children proceeded rapidly to death. Further evaluation of the indications, timing, and implementation of DNR orders for children with severe burns is warranted.

AB - Up to 60% of deaths in pediatric intensive care units occur after placing limits upon life-sustaining treatment. Two-thirds of limitations are made on the last day of life. Our aim was to characterize the timing, indications, and implementation of "do not resuscitate" (DNR) orders and the withdrawal of support from children with severe burns. A retrospective evaluation was conducted of all deaths in a pediatric burn unit over a 7-year period. Values are presented as mean ± SD; two-tailed t-tests and Fisher's exact tests were used for analysis. Of the 29 deaths (total admissions = 1261; 2.3% death rate), 12 were of patients with DNR status. Active withdrawal of support occurred for 15 patients: 10 with DNR orders, 5 without. There was no difference in age, burn size, inhalation injury, etiology of injury, cause of death, intensive care unit days, or ventilator days between DNR patients and non-DNR patients. Of the 12 patients with DNR status, only five had orders indicating no cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), no vasopressors, and no cardioversion. The mean time from DNR to death was 22.9 ± 49.6 hours (median, 2.75 hours). Patients without DNR orders before death had more CPR attempts (0.8 ± 0.6 vs. 0.3 ± 0.6; P < .05). At the time of death, few patients with DNR orders were receiving vasopressors (two patients) or underwent CPR (1 patient). Of the 17 patients without DNR orders, 12 underwent resuscitative efforts: CPR (11), vasopressors (12), or cardioversion (9). No resuscitative efforts were undertaken for four children, two with DNR orders. For the acutely injured child there is a strong tendency to wait until the last possible hours of life to address limitation of life-sustaining measures. Documentation of limitation of care was not previously addressed in nearly a third of cases in which support was actively withdrawn. Once a decision to limit support was made, the majority of children proceeded rapidly to death. Further evaluation of the indications, timing, and implementation of DNR orders for children with severe burns is warranted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750807649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750807649&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.BCR.0000245436.06218.95

DO - 10.1097/01.BCR.0000245436.06218.95

M3 - Article

C2 - 17091074

AN - SCOPUS:33750807649

VL - 27

SP - 803

EP - 808

JO - Journal of Burn Care and Research

JF - Journal of Burn Care and Research

SN - 1559-047X

IS - 6

ER -