Empirical and theoretical evidence for herd size as a risk factor for swine diseases

Ian Gardner, Preben Willeberg, Jan Mousing

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Herd size is frequently studied as a risk factor for swine diseases, yet the biological rationale for a reported association with herd size (whether positive or negative) is rarely adequately discussed in published epidemiological studies. Biologically plausible reasons for a positive association between herd size and disease include a greater risk of introduction of pathogens from outside the herd, greater risk of transmission of pathogens within and among herds when the herd is large, and effects of management and environmental factors that are related to herd size. However, compared with owners of small herds, owners of large herds might more frequently adopt management and housing practices that mitigate this theoretically increased risk. We used studies of pleuritis, pneumonia and pseudorabies to describe the epidemiological issues involved in evaluations of the relationship between management factors, herd size and disease. In future studies, we recommend that (i) herd size be measured in a way that best characterizes the true population at risk; (ii) studies that evaluate management-related risk factors should account for herd size wherever possible; (iii) population-based studies of the interrelationships among management factors and between management factors, herd size, herd density and pig density be done; (iv) likely biological reasons for any herd-size effect be postulated; and (v) the distribution of herd sizes in the source population and the study sample be described.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)43-55
Number of pages13
JournalAnimal health research reviews/Conference of Research Workers in Animal Diseases
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2002

Fingerprint

swine diseases
herd size
risk factors
herds
Aujeszky disease
pathogens
at-risk population
epidemiological studies
pneumonia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology

Cite this

Empirical and theoretical evidence for herd size as a risk factor for swine diseases. / Gardner, Ian; Willeberg, Preben; Mousing, Jan.

In: Animal health research reviews/Conference of Research Workers in Animal Diseases, Vol. 3, No. 1, 01.01.2002, p. 43-55.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{beb6a97cb92d43b792c8087e57351423,
title = "Empirical and theoretical evidence for herd size as a risk factor for swine diseases",
abstract = "Herd size is frequently studied as a risk factor for swine diseases, yet the biological rationale for a reported association with herd size (whether positive or negative) is rarely adequately discussed in published epidemiological studies. Biologically plausible reasons for a positive association between herd size and disease include a greater risk of introduction of pathogens from outside the herd, greater risk of transmission of pathogens within and among herds when the herd is large, and effects of management and environmental factors that are related to herd size. However, compared with owners of small herds, owners of large herds might more frequently adopt management and housing practices that mitigate this theoretically increased risk. We used studies of pleuritis, pneumonia and pseudorabies to describe the epidemiological issues involved in evaluations of the relationship between management factors, herd size and disease. In future studies, we recommend that (i) herd size be measured in a way that best characterizes the true population at risk; (ii) studies that evaluate management-related risk factors should account for herd size wherever possible; (iii) population-based studies of the interrelationships among management factors and between management factors, herd size, herd density and pig density be done; (iv) likely biological reasons for any herd-size effect be postulated; and (v) the distribution of herd sizes in the source population and the study sample be described.",
author = "Ian Gardner and Preben Willeberg and Jan Mousing",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1079/AHRR200239",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "43--55",
journal = "Animal Health Research Reviews",
issn = "1466-2523",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Empirical and theoretical evidence for herd size as a risk factor for swine diseases

AU - Gardner, Ian

AU - Willeberg, Preben

AU - Mousing, Jan

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Herd size is frequently studied as a risk factor for swine diseases, yet the biological rationale for a reported association with herd size (whether positive or negative) is rarely adequately discussed in published epidemiological studies. Biologically plausible reasons for a positive association between herd size and disease include a greater risk of introduction of pathogens from outside the herd, greater risk of transmission of pathogens within and among herds when the herd is large, and effects of management and environmental factors that are related to herd size. However, compared with owners of small herds, owners of large herds might more frequently adopt management and housing practices that mitigate this theoretically increased risk. We used studies of pleuritis, pneumonia and pseudorabies to describe the epidemiological issues involved in evaluations of the relationship between management factors, herd size and disease. In future studies, we recommend that (i) herd size be measured in a way that best characterizes the true population at risk; (ii) studies that evaluate management-related risk factors should account for herd size wherever possible; (iii) population-based studies of the interrelationships among management factors and between management factors, herd size, herd density and pig density be done; (iv) likely biological reasons for any herd-size effect be postulated; and (v) the distribution of herd sizes in the source population and the study sample be described.

AB - Herd size is frequently studied as a risk factor for swine diseases, yet the biological rationale for a reported association with herd size (whether positive or negative) is rarely adequately discussed in published epidemiological studies. Biologically plausible reasons for a positive association between herd size and disease include a greater risk of introduction of pathogens from outside the herd, greater risk of transmission of pathogens within and among herds when the herd is large, and effects of management and environmental factors that are related to herd size. However, compared with owners of small herds, owners of large herds might more frequently adopt management and housing practices that mitigate this theoretically increased risk. We used studies of pleuritis, pneumonia and pseudorabies to describe the epidemiological issues involved in evaluations of the relationship between management factors, herd size and disease. In future studies, we recommend that (i) herd size be measured in a way that best characterizes the true population at risk; (ii) studies that evaluate management-related risk factors should account for herd size wherever possible; (iii) population-based studies of the interrelationships among management factors and between management factors, herd size, herd density and pig density be done; (iv) likely biological reasons for any herd-size effect be postulated; and (v) the distribution of herd sizes in the source population and the study sample be described.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036594756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036594756&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1079/AHRR200239

DO - 10.1079/AHRR200239

M3 - Review article

C2 - 12400869

AN - SCOPUS:0036594756

VL - 3

SP - 43

EP - 55

JO - Animal Health Research Reviews

JF - Animal Health Research Reviews

SN - 1466-2523

IS - 1

ER -