Emergency preparedness for biological and chemical incidents: A survey of anesthesiology residency programs in the United States

Keith A. Candiotti, Aimee Kamat, Paul Barach, Fani Nhuch, David Lubarsky, David J. Birnbach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We surveyed health care professionals about their preparations to manage the clinical problems associated with patients exposed to hazardous substances, including weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Training for WMD is considered a key part of public health policy and preparedness. Although such events are rare, when they do occur, they can cause mass casualties. In many models of mass casualty management, anesthesiology personnel are responsible for treating patients immediately on arrival at the hospital. We studied the extent of training offered to anesthesiology personnel in the use of WMD protective gear and patient management in United States (US) anesthesiology residency programs. Information was obtained via an online survey to all program directors and chairpersons of anesthesiology programs. We polled all of the 135 US anesthesiology programs of which 90 (67%) responded. Only 37% had any form of training, and many of them did not repeat training after initial sessions. Twenty-eight percent of programs east of the Mississippi River reported some form of training whereas only 17% of programs west of it reported training available. The majority of anesthesia residency programs in the US that responded to our survey provided little or no training in the management of patients exposed to WMD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1135-1140
Number of pages6
JournalAnesthesia and Analgesia
Volume101
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Biohazard Release
Chemical Hazard Release
Civil Defense
Weapons of Mass Destruction
Anesthesiology
Internship and Residency
Mass Casualty Incidents
Personnel Management
Mississippi
Hazardous Substances
Public Policy
Health Policy
Rivers
Anesthesia
Public Health
Surveys and Questionnaires
Delivery of Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

Emergency preparedness for biological and chemical incidents : A survey of anesthesiology residency programs in the United States. / Candiotti, Keith A.; Kamat, Aimee; Barach, Paul; Nhuch, Fani; Lubarsky, David; Birnbach, David J.

In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 101, No. 4, 01.01.2005, p. 1135-1140.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Candiotti, Keith A. ; Kamat, Aimee ; Barach, Paul ; Nhuch, Fani ; Lubarsky, David ; Birnbach, David J. / Emergency preparedness for biological and chemical incidents : A survey of anesthesiology residency programs in the United States. In: Anesthesia and Analgesia. 2005 ; Vol. 101, No. 4. pp. 1135-1140.
@article{82aea393128743d080f1485961b4effe,
title = "Emergency preparedness for biological and chemical incidents: A survey of anesthesiology residency programs in the United States",
abstract = "We surveyed health care professionals about their preparations to manage the clinical problems associated with patients exposed to hazardous substances, including weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Training for WMD is considered a key part of public health policy and preparedness. Although such events are rare, when they do occur, they can cause mass casualties. In many models of mass casualty management, anesthesiology personnel are responsible for treating patients immediately on arrival at the hospital. We studied the extent of training offered to anesthesiology personnel in the use of WMD protective gear and patient management in United States (US) anesthesiology residency programs. Information was obtained via an online survey to all program directors and chairpersons of anesthesiology programs. We polled all of the 135 US anesthesiology programs of which 90 (67{\%}) responded. Only 37{\%} had any form of training, and many of them did not repeat training after initial sessions. Twenty-eight percent of programs east of the Mississippi River reported some form of training whereas only 17{\%} of programs west of it reported training available. The majority of anesthesia residency programs in the US that responded to our survey provided little or no training in the management of patients exposed to WMD.",
author = "Candiotti, {Keith A.} and Aimee Kamat and Paul Barach and Fani Nhuch and David Lubarsky and Birnbach, {David J.}",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1213/01.ane.0000167642.11429.f5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "101",
pages = "1135--1140",
journal = "Anesthesia and Analgesia",
issn = "0003-2999",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emergency preparedness for biological and chemical incidents

T2 - A survey of anesthesiology residency programs in the United States

AU - Candiotti, Keith A.

AU - Kamat, Aimee

AU - Barach, Paul

AU - Nhuch, Fani

AU - Lubarsky, David

AU - Birnbach, David J.

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - We surveyed health care professionals about their preparations to manage the clinical problems associated with patients exposed to hazardous substances, including weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Training for WMD is considered a key part of public health policy and preparedness. Although such events are rare, when they do occur, they can cause mass casualties. In many models of mass casualty management, anesthesiology personnel are responsible for treating patients immediately on arrival at the hospital. We studied the extent of training offered to anesthesiology personnel in the use of WMD protective gear and patient management in United States (US) anesthesiology residency programs. Information was obtained via an online survey to all program directors and chairpersons of anesthesiology programs. We polled all of the 135 US anesthesiology programs of which 90 (67%) responded. Only 37% had any form of training, and many of them did not repeat training after initial sessions. Twenty-eight percent of programs east of the Mississippi River reported some form of training whereas only 17% of programs west of it reported training available. The majority of anesthesia residency programs in the US that responded to our survey provided little or no training in the management of patients exposed to WMD.

AB - We surveyed health care professionals about their preparations to manage the clinical problems associated with patients exposed to hazardous substances, including weapons of mass destruction (WMD). Training for WMD is considered a key part of public health policy and preparedness. Although such events are rare, when they do occur, they can cause mass casualties. In many models of mass casualty management, anesthesiology personnel are responsible for treating patients immediately on arrival at the hospital. We studied the extent of training offered to anesthesiology personnel in the use of WMD protective gear and patient management in United States (US) anesthesiology residency programs. Information was obtained via an online survey to all program directors and chairpersons of anesthesiology programs. We polled all of the 135 US anesthesiology programs of which 90 (67%) responded. Only 37% had any form of training, and many of them did not repeat training after initial sessions. Twenty-eight percent of programs east of the Mississippi River reported some form of training whereas only 17% of programs west of it reported training available. The majority of anesthesia residency programs in the US that responded to our survey provided little or no training in the management of patients exposed to WMD.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25644437769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=25644437769&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1213/01.ane.0000167642.11429.f5

DO - 10.1213/01.ane.0000167642.11429.f5

M3 - Article

C2 - 16192534

AN - SCOPUS:25644437769

VL - 101

SP - 1135

EP - 1140

JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia

JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia

SN - 0003-2999

IS - 4

ER -