Emergency department pericardial drainage for penetrating cardiac wounds is a viable option for stabilization

Teresa S. Jones, Clay Cothren Burlew, Robert T. Stovall, Fredric M. Pieracci, Jeffrey L. Johnson, Gregory Jurkovich, Ernest E. Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Penetrating cardiac injuries (PCI) causing tamponade causes subendocardial ischemia, arrhythmias, and cardiac arrest. Pericardial drainage is an important principle, but where drainage should be performed is debated. We hypothesize that drainage in the emergency department (ED) does not delay definitive repair. METHODS: Over a 16-year period, patients sustaining PCI were reviewed. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients with PCI survived to the operating room (OR), with 39 undergoing ED thoracotomy. An additional 39 patients underwent pericardial drainage, 17 (44%) in the ED and 22 in the OR. Comparing the ED with OR pericardial drainage groups, they had a similar ED systolic pressure (99 ± 25 vs 99 ± 34), heart rate (103 ± 16 vs 85 ± 37), median time to the OR (20 vs 22 min), and mortality (12% vs 23%). CONCLUSIONS: ED pericardial drainage for PCI did not appear to delay operation and had an acceptably low mortality rate. Pericardial drainage is a viable option for stabilization before definitive surgery when surgical intervention is not immediately available in the hemodynamically marginal patient.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)931-934
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume207
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Penetrating Wounds
Hospital Emergency Service
Drainage
Operating Rooms
Wounds and Injuries
Mortality
Thoracotomy
Heart Arrest
Cardiac Arrhythmias
Ischemia
Heart Rate
Blood Pressure

Keywords

  • Cardiac injury
  • ED thoracotomy
  • Penetrating trauma
  • Pericardial drain
  • Pericardial tamponade
  • Trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Emergency department pericardial drainage for penetrating cardiac wounds is a viable option for stabilization. / Jones, Teresa S.; Burlew, Clay Cothren; Stovall, Robert T.; Pieracci, Fredric M.; Johnson, Jeffrey L.; Jurkovich, Gregory; Moore, Ernest E.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 207, No. 6, 01.01.2014, p. 931-934.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jones, Teresa S. ; Burlew, Clay Cothren ; Stovall, Robert T. ; Pieracci, Fredric M. ; Johnson, Jeffrey L. ; Jurkovich, Gregory ; Moore, Ernest E. / Emergency department pericardial drainage for penetrating cardiac wounds is a viable option for stabilization. In: American Journal of Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 207, No. 6. pp. 931-934.
@article{cac8770f677b41adbe2b3efe9b68190d,
title = "Emergency department pericardial drainage for penetrating cardiac wounds is a viable option for stabilization",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Penetrating cardiac injuries (PCI) causing tamponade causes subendocardial ischemia, arrhythmias, and cardiac arrest. Pericardial drainage is an important principle, but where drainage should be performed is debated. We hypothesize that drainage in the emergency department (ED) does not delay definitive repair. METHODS: Over a 16-year period, patients sustaining PCI were reviewed. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients with PCI survived to the operating room (OR), with 39 undergoing ED thoracotomy. An additional 39 patients underwent pericardial drainage, 17 (44{\%}) in the ED and 22 in the OR. Comparing the ED with OR pericardial drainage groups, they had a similar ED systolic pressure (99 ± 25 vs 99 ± 34), heart rate (103 ± 16 vs 85 ± 37), median time to the OR (20 vs 22 min), and mortality (12{\%} vs 23{\%}). CONCLUSIONS: ED pericardial drainage for PCI did not appear to delay operation and had an acceptably low mortality rate. Pericardial drainage is a viable option for stabilization before definitive surgery when surgical intervention is not immediately available in the hemodynamically marginal patient.",
keywords = "Cardiac injury, ED thoracotomy, Penetrating trauma, Pericardial drain, Pericardial tamponade, Trauma",
author = "Jones, {Teresa S.} and Burlew, {Clay Cothren} and Stovall, {Robert T.} and Pieracci, {Fredric M.} and Johnson, {Jeffrey L.} and Gregory Jurkovich and Moore, {Ernest E.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.042",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "207",
pages = "931--934",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Emergency department pericardial drainage for penetrating cardiac wounds is a viable option for stabilization

AU - Jones, Teresa S.

AU - Burlew, Clay Cothren

AU - Stovall, Robert T.

AU - Pieracci, Fredric M.

AU - Johnson, Jeffrey L.

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

AU - Moore, Ernest E.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Penetrating cardiac injuries (PCI) causing tamponade causes subendocardial ischemia, arrhythmias, and cardiac arrest. Pericardial drainage is an important principle, but where drainage should be performed is debated. We hypothesize that drainage in the emergency department (ED) does not delay definitive repair. METHODS: Over a 16-year period, patients sustaining PCI were reviewed. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients with PCI survived to the operating room (OR), with 39 undergoing ED thoracotomy. An additional 39 patients underwent pericardial drainage, 17 (44%) in the ED and 22 in the OR. Comparing the ED with OR pericardial drainage groups, they had a similar ED systolic pressure (99 ± 25 vs 99 ± 34), heart rate (103 ± 16 vs 85 ± 37), median time to the OR (20 vs 22 min), and mortality (12% vs 23%). CONCLUSIONS: ED pericardial drainage for PCI did not appear to delay operation and had an acceptably low mortality rate. Pericardial drainage is a viable option for stabilization before definitive surgery when surgical intervention is not immediately available in the hemodynamically marginal patient.

AB - BACKGROUND: Penetrating cardiac injuries (PCI) causing tamponade causes subendocardial ischemia, arrhythmias, and cardiac arrest. Pericardial drainage is an important principle, but where drainage should be performed is debated. We hypothesize that drainage in the emergency department (ED) does not delay definitive repair. METHODS: Over a 16-year period, patients sustaining PCI were reviewed. RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients with PCI survived to the operating room (OR), with 39 undergoing ED thoracotomy. An additional 39 patients underwent pericardial drainage, 17 (44%) in the ED and 22 in the OR. Comparing the ED with OR pericardial drainage groups, they had a similar ED systolic pressure (99 ± 25 vs 99 ± 34), heart rate (103 ± 16 vs 85 ± 37), median time to the OR (20 vs 22 min), and mortality (12% vs 23%). CONCLUSIONS: ED pericardial drainage for PCI did not appear to delay operation and had an acceptably low mortality rate. Pericardial drainage is a viable option for stabilization before definitive surgery when surgical intervention is not immediately available in the hemodynamically marginal patient.

KW - Cardiac injury

KW - ED thoracotomy

KW - Penetrating trauma

KW - Pericardial drain

KW - Pericardial tamponade

KW - Trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84901846550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84901846550&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.042

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.08.042

M3 - Article

C2 - 24480233

AN - SCOPUS:84901846550

VL - 207

SP - 931

EP - 934

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 6

ER -