Electrohydraulic lithotripsy with peroral choledochoscopy

Joseph Leung, S. S C Chung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

64 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective - To determine the efficacy of peroral electrohydraulic lithotripsy performed with an extra large duodenoscope (outside diameter 14.8 mm) and a choledochoscope with a diameter of 4.1 mm (Olympus 'mother and baby' endoscope system) in the removal of very large stones from the common bile duct. Design - Prospective study of patients with giant stones in the common bile duct that were resistant to extraction by conventional means. Setting - Endoscopy unit at a university hospital. Patients - Four women and one man aged 48-82 (mean 66.4 years) with a total of nine stones in their common bile ducts ranging from 2.2 to 3.6 cm in diameter. Interventions - Peroral electrohydraulic lithotripsy was performed after intravenous sedation and under antibiotic cover. Two endoscopists took part in each procedure, coordination being achieved by means of a video monitor. The procedures were performed with a Lithotron EL-23 lithotripter and a 3 French lithotripsy probe inserted through the choledochoscope under direct vision. Main outcome measure - Complete clearance of the common bile duct confirmed by occlusion cholangiography. Results - All nine stones (mean minimal diameter 2.6 cm; mean maximal diameter 3.1 cm) were successfully fragmented by electrohydraulic lithotripsy, allowing subsequent extraction with the aid of endoscopy and clearance of the common bile duct. A median of three (range two to five) sessions of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were required to achieve complete clearance of the ducts. Patients stayed a median of eight days in hospital after lithotripsy (range eight to 14). There were no complications. Conclusion - Peroral electrohydraulic lithotripsy offers a safe and effective alternative for the management of patients with large stones in the common bile duct.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)595-598
Number of pages4
JournalBritish Medical Journal
Volume299
Issue number6699
StatePublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lithotripsy
Common Bile Duct
Endoscopy
Duodenoscopes
Cholangiography
Endoscopes
Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Mothers
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Prospective Studies
Anti-Bacterial Agents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Electrohydraulic lithotripsy with peroral choledochoscopy. / Leung, Joseph; Chung, S. S C.

In: British Medical Journal, Vol. 299, No. 6699, 1989, p. 595-598.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leung, Joseph ; Chung, S. S C. / Electrohydraulic lithotripsy with peroral choledochoscopy. In: British Medical Journal. 1989 ; Vol. 299, No. 6699. pp. 595-598.
@article{fc2ce325f9d44b57ba4323ebb001854b,
title = "Electrohydraulic lithotripsy with peroral choledochoscopy",
abstract = "Objective - To determine the efficacy of peroral electrohydraulic lithotripsy performed with an extra large duodenoscope (outside diameter 14.8 mm) and a choledochoscope with a diameter of 4.1 mm (Olympus 'mother and baby' endoscope system) in the removal of very large stones from the common bile duct. Design - Prospective study of patients with giant stones in the common bile duct that were resistant to extraction by conventional means. Setting - Endoscopy unit at a university hospital. Patients - Four women and one man aged 48-82 (mean 66.4 years) with a total of nine stones in their common bile ducts ranging from 2.2 to 3.6 cm in diameter. Interventions - Peroral electrohydraulic lithotripsy was performed after intravenous sedation and under antibiotic cover. Two endoscopists took part in each procedure, coordination being achieved by means of a video monitor. The procedures were performed with a Lithotron EL-23 lithotripter and a 3 French lithotripsy probe inserted through the choledochoscope under direct vision. Main outcome measure - Complete clearance of the common bile duct confirmed by occlusion cholangiography. Results - All nine stones (mean minimal diameter 2.6 cm; mean maximal diameter 3.1 cm) were successfully fragmented by electrohydraulic lithotripsy, allowing subsequent extraction with the aid of endoscopy and clearance of the common bile duct. A median of three (range two to five) sessions of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were required to achieve complete clearance of the ducts. Patients stayed a median of eight days in hospital after lithotripsy (range eight to 14). There were no complications. Conclusion - Peroral electrohydraulic lithotripsy offers a safe and effective alternative for the management of patients with large stones in the common bile duct.",
author = "Joseph Leung and Chung, {S. S C}",
year = "1989",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "299",
pages = "595--598",
journal = "The BMJ",
issn = "0959-8146",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "6699",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Electrohydraulic lithotripsy with peroral choledochoscopy

AU - Leung, Joseph

AU - Chung, S. S C

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - Objective - To determine the efficacy of peroral electrohydraulic lithotripsy performed with an extra large duodenoscope (outside diameter 14.8 mm) and a choledochoscope with a diameter of 4.1 mm (Olympus 'mother and baby' endoscope system) in the removal of very large stones from the common bile duct. Design - Prospective study of patients with giant stones in the common bile duct that were resistant to extraction by conventional means. Setting - Endoscopy unit at a university hospital. Patients - Four women and one man aged 48-82 (mean 66.4 years) with a total of nine stones in their common bile ducts ranging from 2.2 to 3.6 cm in diameter. Interventions - Peroral electrohydraulic lithotripsy was performed after intravenous sedation and under antibiotic cover. Two endoscopists took part in each procedure, coordination being achieved by means of a video monitor. The procedures were performed with a Lithotron EL-23 lithotripter and a 3 French lithotripsy probe inserted through the choledochoscope under direct vision. Main outcome measure - Complete clearance of the common bile duct confirmed by occlusion cholangiography. Results - All nine stones (mean minimal diameter 2.6 cm; mean maximal diameter 3.1 cm) were successfully fragmented by electrohydraulic lithotripsy, allowing subsequent extraction with the aid of endoscopy and clearance of the common bile duct. A median of three (range two to five) sessions of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were required to achieve complete clearance of the ducts. Patients stayed a median of eight days in hospital after lithotripsy (range eight to 14). There were no complications. Conclusion - Peroral electrohydraulic lithotripsy offers a safe and effective alternative for the management of patients with large stones in the common bile duct.

AB - Objective - To determine the efficacy of peroral electrohydraulic lithotripsy performed with an extra large duodenoscope (outside diameter 14.8 mm) and a choledochoscope with a diameter of 4.1 mm (Olympus 'mother and baby' endoscope system) in the removal of very large stones from the common bile duct. Design - Prospective study of patients with giant stones in the common bile duct that were resistant to extraction by conventional means. Setting - Endoscopy unit at a university hospital. Patients - Four women and one man aged 48-82 (mean 66.4 years) with a total of nine stones in their common bile ducts ranging from 2.2 to 3.6 cm in diameter. Interventions - Peroral electrohydraulic lithotripsy was performed after intravenous sedation and under antibiotic cover. Two endoscopists took part in each procedure, coordination being achieved by means of a video monitor. The procedures were performed with a Lithotron EL-23 lithotripter and a 3 French lithotripsy probe inserted through the choledochoscope under direct vision. Main outcome measure - Complete clearance of the common bile duct confirmed by occlusion cholangiography. Results - All nine stones (mean minimal diameter 2.6 cm; mean maximal diameter 3.1 cm) were successfully fragmented by electrohydraulic lithotripsy, allowing subsequent extraction with the aid of endoscopy and clearance of the common bile duct. A median of three (range two to five) sessions of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were required to achieve complete clearance of the ducts. Patients stayed a median of eight days in hospital after lithotripsy (range eight to 14). There were no complications. Conclusion - Peroral electrohydraulic lithotripsy offers a safe and effective alternative for the management of patients with large stones in the common bile duct.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024325718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024325718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2508816

AN - SCOPUS:0024325718

VL - 299

SP - 595

EP - 598

JO - The BMJ

JF - The BMJ

SN - 0959-8146

IS - 6699

ER -