Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation

a meta-analysis

Kutluk Oktay, Aylin Pelin Cil, Heejung Bang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

382 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To determine the efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation relative to IVF with unfrozen oocytes. Design: Meta-analysis. Setting: Academic assisted reproduction center. Patient(s): Results of all reports from January 1997 to June 2005 with the patients undergoing IVF-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with cryopreserved cycles between 1996 and 2004 were compared with those of patients who underwent IVF-ICSI with unfrozen oocytes in 2002 and 2003 in our program. Intervention(s): Mean age and number of ET cycles originating from unfrozen oocytes was matched with those for thaw cycles originating from oocytes cryopreserved with a slow-freezing (SF) protocol. Vitrification (VF) reports were not included in the comparative analysis because of a small number of pregnancies (10) before June 2005. Main Outcome Measure(s): The comparison of fertilization rate, clinical pregnancy, and live-birth rates per injected oocyte, clinical pregnancy and live-birth rates per transfer, and implantation rate between IVF-ICSI cycles with frozen and unfrozen oocytes. Result(s): Live-birth rates per oocyte thawed were 1.9% and 2.0% for SF and VF, respectively, before June 2005. Live-birth rates per injected oocyte and ET, respectively, were 3.4% and 21.6% for SF and were 6.6% and 60.4% for IVF with unfrozen oocytes. Compared to women who underwent IVF after SF, IVF with unfrozen oocytes resulted in significantly better rates of fertilization (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]); 2.22 (1.80, 2.74), of live birth per injected oocyte; 1.5 (1.26, 1.79), and of implantation; 4.66 (3.93, 5.52). These odds ratios were lower when oocyte cryopreservation success rates from 2002-2004 were compared with those for IVF with unfrozen oocytes. When the reports after June 2005 were considered, this trend did not appear to continue. With the consideration of VF reports after June 2005, however, higher pregnancy rates were achieved. Conclusion(s): In vitro fertilization success rates with slow-frozen oocytes are significantly lower when compared with the case of IVF with unfrozen oocytes. Although oocyte cryopreservation with the SF method appears to be justified for preserving fertility when a medical indication exists, its value for elective applications remains to be determined. Pregnancy rates with VF appear to have improved, but further studies will be needed to determine the efficiency and safety of this technique.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)70-80
Number of pages11
JournalFertility and Sterility
Volume86
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Cryopreservation
Oocytes
Meta-Analysis
Vitrification
Freezing
Pregnancy Rate
Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injections
Live Birth
Birth Rate
Fertilization
Odds Ratio
Fertilization in Vitro

Keywords

  • fertility preservation
  • ICSI
  • IVF
  • Oocyte cryopreservation
  • slow freeze
  • vitrification

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation : a meta-analysis. / Oktay, Kutluk; Cil, Aylin Pelin; Bang, Heejung.

In: Fertility and Sterility, Vol. 86, No. 1, 07.2006, p. 70-80.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Oktay, Kutluk ; Cil, Aylin Pelin ; Bang, Heejung. / Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation : a meta-analysis. In: Fertility and Sterility. 2006 ; Vol. 86, No. 1. pp. 70-80.
@article{5a675fc7bd2242259d820e825fcee045,
title = "Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation: a meta-analysis",
abstract = "Objective: To determine the efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation relative to IVF with unfrozen oocytes. Design: Meta-analysis. Setting: Academic assisted reproduction center. Patient(s): Results of all reports from January 1997 to June 2005 with the patients undergoing IVF-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with cryopreserved cycles between 1996 and 2004 were compared with those of patients who underwent IVF-ICSI with unfrozen oocytes in 2002 and 2003 in our program. Intervention(s): Mean age and number of ET cycles originating from unfrozen oocytes was matched with those for thaw cycles originating from oocytes cryopreserved with a slow-freezing (SF) protocol. Vitrification (VF) reports were not included in the comparative analysis because of a small number of pregnancies (10) before June 2005. Main Outcome Measure(s): The comparison of fertilization rate, clinical pregnancy, and live-birth rates per injected oocyte, clinical pregnancy and live-birth rates per transfer, and implantation rate between IVF-ICSI cycles with frozen and unfrozen oocytes. Result(s): Live-birth rates per oocyte thawed were 1.9{\%} and 2.0{\%} for SF and VF, respectively, before June 2005. Live-birth rates per injected oocyte and ET, respectively, were 3.4{\%} and 21.6{\%} for SF and were 6.6{\%} and 60.4{\%} for IVF with unfrozen oocytes. Compared to women who underwent IVF after SF, IVF with unfrozen oocytes resulted in significantly better rates of fertilization (odds ratio [95{\%} confidence interval]); 2.22 (1.80, 2.74), of live birth per injected oocyte; 1.5 (1.26, 1.79), and of implantation; 4.66 (3.93, 5.52). These odds ratios were lower when oocyte cryopreservation success rates from 2002-2004 were compared with those for IVF with unfrozen oocytes. When the reports after June 2005 were considered, this trend did not appear to continue. With the consideration of VF reports after June 2005, however, higher pregnancy rates were achieved. Conclusion(s): In vitro fertilization success rates with slow-frozen oocytes are significantly lower when compared with the case of IVF with unfrozen oocytes. Although oocyte cryopreservation with the SF method appears to be justified for preserving fertility when a medical indication exists, its value for elective applications remains to be determined. Pregnancy rates with VF appear to have improved, but further studies will be needed to determine the efficiency and safety of this technique.",
keywords = "fertility preservation, ICSI, IVF, Oocyte cryopreservation, slow freeze, vitrification",
author = "Kutluk Oktay and Cil, {Aylin Pelin} and Heejung Bang",
year = "2006",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.017",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "86",
pages = "70--80",
journal = "Fertility and Sterility",
issn = "0015-0282",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation

T2 - a meta-analysis

AU - Oktay, Kutluk

AU - Cil, Aylin Pelin

AU - Bang, Heejung

PY - 2006/7

Y1 - 2006/7

N2 - Objective: To determine the efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation relative to IVF with unfrozen oocytes. Design: Meta-analysis. Setting: Academic assisted reproduction center. Patient(s): Results of all reports from January 1997 to June 2005 with the patients undergoing IVF-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with cryopreserved cycles between 1996 and 2004 were compared with those of patients who underwent IVF-ICSI with unfrozen oocytes in 2002 and 2003 in our program. Intervention(s): Mean age and number of ET cycles originating from unfrozen oocytes was matched with those for thaw cycles originating from oocytes cryopreserved with a slow-freezing (SF) protocol. Vitrification (VF) reports were not included in the comparative analysis because of a small number of pregnancies (10) before June 2005. Main Outcome Measure(s): The comparison of fertilization rate, clinical pregnancy, and live-birth rates per injected oocyte, clinical pregnancy and live-birth rates per transfer, and implantation rate between IVF-ICSI cycles with frozen and unfrozen oocytes. Result(s): Live-birth rates per oocyte thawed were 1.9% and 2.0% for SF and VF, respectively, before June 2005. Live-birth rates per injected oocyte and ET, respectively, were 3.4% and 21.6% for SF and were 6.6% and 60.4% for IVF with unfrozen oocytes. Compared to women who underwent IVF after SF, IVF with unfrozen oocytes resulted in significantly better rates of fertilization (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]); 2.22 (1.80, 2.74), of live birth per injected oocyte; 1.5 (1.26, 1.79), and of implantation; 4.66 (3.93, 5.52). These odds ratios were lower when oocyte cryopreservation success rates from 2002-2004 were compared with those for IVF with unfrozen oocytes. When the reports after June 2005 were considered, this trend did not appear to continue. With the consideration of VF reports after June 2005, however, higher pregnancy rates were achieved. Conclusion(s): In vitro fertilization success rates with slow-frozen oocytes are significantly lower when compared with the case of IVF with unfrozen oocytes. Although oocyte cryopreservation with the SF method appears to be justified for preserving fertility when a medical indication exists, its value for elective applications remains to be determined. Pregnancy rates with VF appear to have improved, but further studies will be needed to determine the efficiency and safety of this technique.

AB - Objective: To determine the efficiency of oocyte cryopreservation relative to IVF with unfrozen oocytes. Design: Meta-analysis. Setting: Academic assisted reproduction center. Patient(s): Results of all reports from January 1997 to June 2005 with the patients undergoing IVF-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with cryopreserved cycles between 1996 and 2004 were compared with those of patients who underwent IVF-ICSI with unfrozen oocytes in 2002 and 2003 in our program. Intervention(s): Mean age and number of ET cycles originating from unfrozen oocytes was matched with those for thaw cycles originating from oocytes cryopreserved with a slow-freezing (SF) protocol. Vitrification (VF) reports were not included in the comparative analysis because of a small number of pregnancies (10) before June 2005. Main Outcome Measure(s): The comparison of fertilization rate, clinical pregnancy, and live-birth rates per injected oocyte, clinical pregnancy and live-birth rates per transfer, and implantation rate between IVF-ICSI cycles with frozen and unfrozen oocytes. Result(s): Live-birth rates per oocyte thawed were 1.9% and 2.0% for SF and VF, respectively, before June 2005. Live-birth rates per injected oocyte and ET, respectively, were 3.4% and 21.6% for SF and were 6.6% and 60.4% for IVF with unfrozen oocytes. Compared to women who underwent IVF after SF, IVF with unfrozen oocytes resulted in significantly better rates of fertilization (odds ratio [95% confidence interval]); 2.22 (1.80, 2.74), of live birth per injected oocyte; 1.5 (1.26, 1.79), and of implantation; 4.66 (3.93, 5.52). These odds ratios were lower when oocyte cryopreservation success rates from 2002-2004 were compared with those for IVF with unfrozen oocytes. When the reports after June 2005 were considered, this trend did not appear to continue. With the consideration of VF reports after June 2005, however, higher pregnancy rates were achieved. Conclusion(s): In vitro fertilization success rates with slow-frozen oocytes are significantly lower when compared with the case of IVF with unfrozen oocytes. Although oocyte cryopreservation with the SF method appears to be justified for preserving fertility when a medical indication exists, its value for elective applications remains to be determined. Pregnancy rates with VF appear to have improved, but further studies will be needed to determine the efficiency and safety of this technique.

KW - fertility preservation

KW - ICSI

KW - IVF

KW - Oocyte cryopreservation

KW - slow freeze

KW - vitrification

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745483522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33745483522&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.017

DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.03.017

M3 - Article

VL - 86

SP - 70

EP - 80

JO - Fertility and Sterility

JF - Fertility and Sterility

SN - 0015-0282

IS - 1

ER -