Efficiency and bias in studies of early pregnancy loss

C. R. Weinberg, Irva Hertz-Picciotto, D. D. Baird, A. J. Wilcox

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

26 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent advances in laboratory techniques for measuring the pregnancy hormone human chorionic gonadotropin have allowed detection of occult very early pregnancy losses based on assaying urine. We used data from the Early Pregnancy Study carried out in North Carolina to develop a simplified collection protocol for reducing costs and improving compliance in similar studies conducted in less-selected populations of women. Collection of specimens only during menses would have caused some decrease in sensitivity but would nevertheless have allowed detection of at least 75% of the losses detected in the North Carolina study. Reduced-collection protocols would also result in some loss in specificity. Simulations suggest that moderate losses in sensitivity and specificity, as would result from reduced-collection protocols, produce only moderate loss of power for detecting associations between risk factors and early pregnancy loss. A ''fertility bias'' exists, however, which can produce seriously misleading results when specificity is less than perfect. We therefore recommend use of a baseline group of sterile women, so that criteria for ''pregnancy'' can achieve specificity close to 1.0.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17-22
Number of pages6
JournalEpidemiology
Volume3
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1992
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Pregnancy
Specimen Handling
Menstruation
Chorionic Gonadotropin
Compliance
Fertility
Urine
Hormones
Costs and Cost Analysis
Sensitivity and Specificity
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Cite this

Weinberg, C. R., Hertz-Picciotto, I., Baird, D. D., & Wilcox, A. J. (1992). Efficiency and bias in studies of early pregnancy loss. Epidemiology, 3(1), 17-22.

Efficiency and bias in studies of early pregnancy loss. / Weinberg, C. R.; Hertz-Picciotto, Irva; Baird, D. D.; Wilcox, A. J.

In: Epidemiology, Vol. 3, No. 1, 1992, p. 17-22.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Weinberg, CR, Hertz-Picciotto, I, Baird, DD & Wilcox, AJ 1992, 'Efficiency and bias in studies of early pregnancy loss', Epidemiology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 17-22.
Weinberg, C. R. ; Hertz-Picciotto, Irva ; Baird, D. D. ; Wilcox, A. J. / Efficiency and bias in studies of early pregnancy loss. In: Epidemiology. 1992 ; Vol. 3, No. 1. pp. 17-22.
@article{0ce977e5b3ab414fb1a27fbbdbf087fa,
title = "Efficiency and bias in studies of early pregnancy loss",
abstract = "Recent advances in laboratory techniques for measuring the pregnancy hormone human chorionic gonadotropin have allowed detection of occult very early pregnancy losses based on assaying urine. We used data from the Early Pregnancy Study carried out in North Carolina to develop a simplified collection protocol for reducing costs and improving compliance in similar studies conducted in less-selected populations of women. Collection of specimens only during menses would have caused some decrease in sensitivity but would nevertheless have allowed detection of at least 75{\%} of the losses detected in the North Carolina study. Reduced-collection protocols would also result in some loss in specificity. Simulations suggest that moderate losses in sensitivity and specificity, as would result from reduced-collection protocols, produce only moderate loss of power for detecting associations between risk factors and early pregnancy loss. A ''fertility bias'' exists, however, which can produce seriously misleading results when specificity is less than perfect. We therefore recommend use of a baseline group of sterile women, so that criteria for ''pregnancy'' can achieve specificity close to 1.0.",
author = "Weinberg, {C. R.} and Irva Hertz-Picciotto and Baird, {D. D.} and Wilcox, {A. J.}",
year = "1992",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "17--22",
journal = "Epidemiology",
issn = "1044-3983",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Efficiency and bias in studies of early pregnancy loss

AU - Weinberg, C. R.

AU - Hertz-Picciotto, Irva

AU - Baird, D. D.

AU - Wilcox, A. J.

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Recent advances in laboratory techniques for measuring the pregnancy hormone human chorionic gonadotropin have allowed detection of occult very early pregnancy losses based on assaying urine. We used data from the Early Pregnancy Study carried out in North Carolina to develop a simplified collection protocol for reducing costs and improving compliance in similar studies conducted in less-selected populations of women. Collection of specimens only during menses would have caused some decrease in sensitivity but would nevertheless have allowed detection of at least 75% of the losses detected in the North Carolina study. Reduced-collection protocols would also result in some loss in specificity. Simulations suggest that moderate losses in sensitivity and specificity, as would result from reduced-collection protocols, produce only moderate loss of power for detecting associations between risk factors and early pregnancy loss. A ''fertility bias'' exists, however, which can produce seriously misleading results when specificity is less than perfect. We therefore recommend use of a baseline group of sterile women, so that criteria for ''pregnancy'' can achieve specificity close to 1.0.

AB - Recent advances in laboratory techniques for measuring the pregnancy hormone human chorionic gonadotropin have allowed detection of occult very early pregnancy losses based on assaying urine. We used data from the Early Pregnancy Study carried out in North Carolina to develop a simplified collection protocol for reducing costs and improving compliance in similar studies conducted in less-selected populations of women. Collection of specimens only during menses would have caused some decrease in sensitivity but would nevertheless have allowed detection of at least 75% of the losses detected in the North Carolina study. Reduced-collection protocols would also result in some loss in specificity. Simulations suggest that moderate losses in sensitivity and specificity, as would result from reduced-collection protocols, produce only moderate loss of power for detecting associations between risk factors and early pregnancy loss. A ''fertility bias'' exists, however, which can produce seriously misleading results when specificity is less than perfect. We therefore recommend use of a baseline group of sterile women, so that criteria for ''pregnancy'' can achieve specificity close to 1.0.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026583865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026583865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1554805

AN - SCOPUS:0026583865

VL - 3

SP - 17

EP - 22

JO - Epidemiology

JF - Epidemiology

SN - 1044-3983

IS - 1

ER -