Effects of peanut oil consumption on appetite and food choice

Smita Iyer, L. A. Boateng, R. L. Sales, S. B. Coelho, P. Lokko, J. B.R. Monteiro, N. M.B. Costa, R. D. Mattes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Peanut consumption may improve lipid profiles without promoting weight gain. Both properties have been attributed to their high-unsaturated fat content. Mono and polyunsaturated fatty acids reportedly hold stronger satiety value than saturated fats and may help appetite control. This study investigated the effects of chronic peanut oil consumption on appetite and food choice. Research methods and procedures: A total of 129 healthy adults from three countries (Brazil, Ghana and US) were randomly assigned to one of four treatment arms: consumption of peanut oil, olive oil or safflower oil as 30% of individual resting energy expenditure (REE) for 8 weeks or no dietary intervention. Participants received no other dietary guidance. They completed appetite questionnaires eliciting information about hunger, fullness, desire to eat, and prospective consumption during all waking hours for 1 day at weeks 2 and 6 and for 1 or 3 days at weeks 0, 4 and 8. Diet records were completed at weeks 0, 4 and 8. Results: No differences in appetitive ratings were observed over the 8-week trial. There were no significant treatment by time interactions. Total caloric intake was significantly higher at week 8 relative to baseline (F = 10.08, P < 0.05). The increases for each treatment were: peanut oil = 197 ± 114; olive oil = 237 ± 121; safflower oil = 274 ± 90; control = 75 ± 71. Free-feeding intake, an index of dietary compensation, was reduced significantly at weeks 4 and 8 compared to baseline (F = 9.08, P < 0.00). The declines (compensation scores) were (kcals): peanut oil = -208 ± 105 (46%); olive oil = -235 ± 105 (50%); safflower oil = -186 ± 102 (44%). There were no significant differences across countries in appetite ratings. Discussion: A prior intervention with whole peanuts reported a dietary compensation score of 66% over 8 weeks, this compares to a 46% compensation score observed with peanut oil. Our data suggests that the lipid fraction in peanuts elicits a weak effect on satiety.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)704-710
Number of pages7
JournalInternational Journal of Obesity
Volume30
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Appetite
Safflower Oil
Food
Unsaturated Fats
Lipids
Diet Records
Ghana
Hunger
Energy Intake
Unsaturated Fatty Acids
Energy Metabolism
Weight Gain
Brazil
Therapeutics
Fats
arachis oil
Research
Arachis
Olive Oil

Keywords

  • Appetite
  • Dietary compensation
  • Energy intake
  • Free-feeding intake
  • Peanut oil
  • Satiety

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Cite this

Iyer, S., Boateng, L. A., Sales, R. L., Coelho, S. B., Lokko, P., Monteiro, J. B. R., ... Mattes, R. D. (2006). Effects of peanut oil consumption on appetite and food choice. International Journal of Obesity, 30(4), 704-710. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803180

Effects of peanut oil consumption on appetite and food choice. / Iyer, Smita; Boateng, L. A.; Sales, R. L.; Coelho, S. B.; Lokko, P.; Monteiro, J. B.R.; Costa, N. M.B.; Mattes, R. D.

In: International Journal of Obesity, Vol. 30, No. 4, 01.04.2006, p. 704-710.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Iyer, S, Boateng, LA, Sales, RL, Coelho, SB, Lokko, P, Monteiro, JBR, Costa, NMB & Mattes, RD 2006, 'Effects of peanut oil consumption on appetite and food choice', International Journal of Obesity, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 704-710. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803180
Iyer S, Boateng LA, Sales RL, Coelho SB, Lokko P, Monteiro JBR et al. Effects of peanut oil consumption on appetite and food choice. International Journal of Obesity. 2006 Apr 1;30(4):704-710. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0803180
Iyer, Smita ; Boateng, L. A. ; Sales, R. L. ; Coelho, S. B. ; Lokko, P. ; Monteiro, J. B.R. ; Costa, N. M.B. ; Mattes, R. D. / Effects of peanut oil consumption on appetite and food choice. In: International Journal of Obesity. 2006 ; Vol. 30, No. 4. pp. 704-710.
@article{9a5d31536426457ca1f1179b43de4b01,
title = "Effects of peanut oil consumption on appetite and food choice",
abstract = "Objective: Peanut consumption may improve lipid profiles without promoting weight gain. Both properties have been attributed to their high-unsaturated fat content. Mono and polyunsaturated fatty acids reportedly hold stronger satiety value than saturated fats and may help appetite control. This study investigated the effects of chronic peanut oil consumption on appetite and food choice. Research methods and procedures: A total of 129 healthy adults from three countries (Brazil, Ghana and US) were randomly assigned to one of four treatment arms: consumption of peanut oil, olive oil or safflower oil as 30{\%} of individual resting energy expenditure (REE) for 8 weeks or no dietary intervention. Participants received no other dietary guidance. They completed appetite questionnaires eliciting information about hunger, fullness, desire to eat, and prospective consumption during all waking hours for 1 day at weeks 2 and 6 and for 1 or 3 days at weeks 0, 4 and 8. Diet records were completed at weeks 0, 4 and 8. Results: No differences in appetitive ratings were observed over the 8-week trial. There were no significant treatment by time interactions. Total caloric intake was significantly higher at week 8 relative to baseline (F = 10.08, P < 0.05). The increases for each treatment were: peanut oil = 197 ± 114; olive oil = 237 ± 121; safflower oil = 274 ± 90; control = 75 ± 71. Free-feeding intake, an index of dietary compensation, was reduced significantly at weeks 4 and 8 compared to baseline (F = 9.08, P < 0.00). The declines (compensation scores) were (kcals): peanut oil = -208 ± 105 (46{\%}); olive oil = -235 ± 105 (50{\%}); safflower oil = -186 ± 102 (44{\%}). There were no significant differences across countries in appetite ratings. Discussion: A prior intervention with whole peanuts reported a dietary compensation score of 66{\%} over 8 weeks, this compares to a 46{\%} compensation score observed with peanut oil. Our data suggests that the lipid fraction in peanuts elicits a weak effect on satiety.",
keywords = "Appetite, Dietary compensation, Energy intake, Free-feeding intake, Peanut oil, Satiety",
author = "Smita Iyer and Boateng, {L. A.} and Sales, {R. L.} and Coelho, {S. B.} and P. Lokko and Monteiro, {J. B.R.} and Costa, {N. M.B.} and Mattes, {R. D.}",
year = "2006",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1038/sj.ijo.0803180",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "704--710",
journal = "International Journal of Obesity",
issn = "0307-0565",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effects of peanut oil consumption on appetite and food choice

AU - Iyer, Smita

AU - Boateng, L. A.

AU - Sales, R. L.

AU - Coelho, S. B.

AU - Lokko, P.

AU - Monteiro, J. B.R.

AU - Costa, N. M.B.

AU - Mattes, R. D.

PY - 2006/4/1

Y1 - 2006/4/1

N2 - Objective: Peanut consumption may improve lipid profiles without promoting weight gain. Both properties have been attributed to their high-unsaturated fat content. Mono and polyunsaturated fatty acids reportedly hold stronger satiety value than saturated fats and may help appetite control. This study investigated the effects of chronic peanut oil consumption on appetite and food choice. Research methods and procedures: A total of 129 healthy adults from three countries (Brazil, Ghana and US) were randomly assigned to one of four treatment arms: consumption of peanut oil, olive oil or safflower oil as 30% of individual resting energy expenditure (REE) for 8 weeks or no dietary intervention. Participants received no other dietary guidance. They completed appetite questionnaires eliciting information about hunger, fullness, desire to eat, and prospective consumption during all waking hours for 1 day at weeks 2 and 6 and for 1 or 3 days at weeks 0, 4 and 8. Diet records were completed at weeks 0, 4 and 8. Results: No differences in appetitive ratings were observed over the 8-week trial. There were no significant treatment by time interactions. Total caloric intake was significantly higher at week 8 relative to baseline (F = 10.08, P < 0.05). The increases for each treatment were: peanut oil = 197 ± 114; olive oil = 237 ± 121; safflower oil = 274 ± 90; control = 75 ± 71. Free-feeding intake, an index of dietary compensation, was reduced significantly at weeks 4 and 8 compared to baseline (F = 9.08, P < 0.00). The declines (compensation scores) were (kcals): peanut oil = -208 ± 105 (46%); olive oil = -235 ± 105 (50%); safflower oil = -186 ± 102 (44%). There were no significant differences across countries in appetite ratings. Discussion: A prior intervention with whole peanuts reported a dietary compensation score of 66% over 8 weeks, this compares to a 46% compensation score observed with peanut oil. Our data suggests that the lipid fraction in peanuts elicits a weak effect on satiety.

AB - Objective: Peanut consumption may improve lipid profiles without promoting weight gain. Both properties have been attributed to their high-unsaturated fat content. Mono and polyunsaturated fatty acids reportedly hold stronger satiety value than saturated fats and may help appetite control. This study investigated the effects of chronic peanut oil consumption on appetite and food choice. Research methods and procedures: A total of 129 healthy adults from three countries (Brazil, Ghana and US) were randomly assigned to one of four treatment arms: consumption of peanut oil, olive oil or safflower oil as 30% of individual resting energy expenditure (REE) for 8 weeks or no dietary intervention. Participants received no other dietary guidance. They completed appetite questionnaires eliciting information about hunger, fullness, desire to eat, and prospective consumption during all waking hours for 1 day at weeks 2 and 6 and for 1 or 3 days at weeks 0, 4 and 8. Diet records were completed at weeks 0, 4 and 8. Results: No differences in appetitive ratings were observed over the 8-week trial. There were no significant treatment by time interactions. Total caloric intake was significantly higher at week 8 relative to baseline (F = 10.08, P < 0.05). The increases for each treatment were: peanut oil = 197 ± 114; olive oil = 237 ± 121; safflower oil = 274 ± 90; control = 75 ± 71. Free-feeding intake, an index of dietary compensation, was reduced significantly at weeks 4 and 8 compared to baseline (F = 9.08, P < 0.00). The declines (compensation scores) were (kcals): peanut oil = -208 ± 105 (46%); olive oil = -235 ± 105 (50%); safflower oil = -186 ± 102 (44%). There were no significant differences across countries in appetite ratings. Discussion: A prior intervention with whole peanuts reported a dietary compensation score of 66% over 8 weeks, this compares to a 46% compensation score observed with peanut oil. Our data suggests that the lipid fraction in peanuts elicits a weak effect on satiety.

KW - Appetite

KW - Dietary compensation

KW - Energy intake

KW - Free-feeding intake

KW - Peanut oil

KW - Satiety

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33645472819&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33645472819&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803180

DO - 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803180

M3 - Article

C2 - 16314877

AN - SCOPUS:33645472819

VL - 30

SP - 704

EP - 710

JO - International Journal of Obesity

JF - International Journal of Obesity

SN - 0307-0565

IS - 4

ER -