Abstract
Fundamental frequency perturbation (jitter) during sustained vowel phonations of speakers under topical anesthesia of the larynx was investigated for five adult males. The results showed that the average jitter was significantly greater under the anesthesia than normal conditions, and that the jitter difference between the two conditions was more prominent at high frequency phonations. Implications of these data for tactile and proprioceptive feedback in phonatory frequency control are discussed.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 274-283 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Speech and Hearing Research |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| State | Published - 1980 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Fingerprint
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Otorhinolaryngology
Cite this
Effects of laryngeal topical anesthesia on voice fundamental frequency perturbation. / Sorensen, D.; Horii, Y.; Leonard, Rebecca J.
In: Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, Vol. 23, No. 2, 1980, p. 274-283.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of laryngeal topical anesthesia on voice fundamental frequency perturbation
AU - Sorensen, D.
AU - Horii, Y.
AU - Leonard, Rebecca J
PY - 1980
Y1 - 1980
N2 - Fundamental frequency perturbation (jitter) during sustained vowel phonations of speakers under topical anesthesia of the larynx was investigated for five adult males. The results showed that the average jitter was significantly greater under the anesthesia than normal conditions, and that the jitter difference between the two conditions was more prominent at high frequency phonations. Implications of these data for tactile and proprioceptive feedback in phonatory frequency control are discussed.
AB - Fundamental frequency perturbation (jitter) during sustained vowel phonations of speakers under topical anesthesia of the larynx was investigated for five adult males. The results showed that the average jitter was significantly greater under the anesthesia than normal conditions, and that the jitter difference between the two conditions was more prominent at high frequency phonations. Implications of these data for tactile and proprioceptive feedback in phonatory frequency control are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019143672&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019143672&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 7442190
AN - SCOPUS:0019143672
VL - 23
SP - 274
EP - 283
JO - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
JF - Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
SN - 1092-4388
IS - 2
ER -