Effectiveness of state trauma systems in reducing injury’related mortality

A National Evaluation

A. Nathen, Gregory Jurkovich, F. Rivara, R. Maier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The authors postulated that implementation of an organized system of trauma care would reduce injury-related mortality. In order to evaluate this hypothesis a national study was completed comparing injury mortality rates in states with and without a trauma system. Sources for information included the 1993 Inventory of Trauma Systems, Compressed Mortality Files of the National Center for Health Statistics and the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). All trauma systems (TS’s) in the inventory have at the minimum a legal authority, which involves the authority to designate trauma centers and to establish triage procedures that allow prehospital personnel to bypass nearer facilities. A total of 22 TS’s were implemented by 1995 and included in the study. Global injury mortality rates were lower in states with trauma systems. A reduction was also noted in deaths by unintentional injury. Motor vehicle crashes (MVC) account for the greatest majority of unintentional injuries and were found to have an 18% reduction of mortality in states with TS’s. The authors recognized that other factors might impact MVC related mortality that is separate from the presence of a trauma system. To analyze this age, speed limits, restraint laws and population distribution were evaluated. Higher speed limits were shown to have the highest increase in mortality; primary enforcement of restraint laws showed a significant reduction in risk of death; additionally, a beneficial effect of TS’s extended across all age groups. Other studies of regional TS’s have been done but are limited to single states or counties. This study has the advantages of a large sample size, geographic distribution of the states and the consideration given to other parameters that effect MVC related mortality. The limitations of this study include issues that could underestimate the effectiveness of trauma systems such as variations between states with and without trauma systems and the cross-sectional design gives no insight into the changes that occur with the evolution of trauma systems over time. Overall, the evaluation demonstrates that states with trauma systems have a 9% reduction in global injury mortality with the greatest effect evident in MVC’s. The substantial costs and personnel associated with trauma systems are relatively insignificant when compared to the potential lives saved and the productivity gains equivalent to millions of dollars.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalJournal of Trauma Nursing
Volume7
Issue number2
StatePublished - Jan 1 2000
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Mortality
Wounds and Injuries
Motor Vehicles
National Center for Health Statistics (U.S.)
Law Enforcement
Equipment and Supplies
Triage
Trauma Centers
Risk Reduction Behavior
Sample Size
Age Groups
Demography
Costs and Cost Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency
  • Critical Care
  • Advanced and Specialized Nursing

Cite this

Effectiveness of state trauma systems in reducing injury’related mortality : A National Evaluation. / Nathen, A.; Jurkovich, Gregory; Rivara, F.; Maier, R.

In: Journal of Trauma Nursing, Vol. 7, No. 2, 01.01.2000.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{385b0e09331d4b20a40a59498939d665,
title = "Effectiveness of state trauma systems in reducing injury’related mortality: A National Evaluation",
abstract = "The authors postulated that implementation of an organized system of trauma care would reduce injury-related mortality. In order to evaluate this hypothesis a national study was completed comparing injury mortality rates in states with and without a trauma system. Sources for information included the 1993 Inventory of Trauma Systems, Compressed Mortality Files of the National Center for Health Statistics and the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). All trauma systems (TS’s) in the inventory have at the minimum a legal authority, which involves the authority to designate trauma centers and to establish triage procedures that allow prehospital personnel to bypass nearer facilities. A total of 22 TS’s were implemented by 1995 and included in the study. Global injury mortality rates were lower in states with trauma systems. A reduction was also noted in deaths by unintentional injury. Motor vehicle crashes (MVC) account for the greatest majority of unintentional injuries and were found to have an 18{\%} reduction of mortality in states with TS’s. The authors recognized that other factors might impact MVC related mortality that is separate from the presence of a trauma system. To analyze this age, speed limits, restraint laws and population distribution were evaluated. Higher speed limits were shown to have the highest increase in mortality; primary enforcement of restraint laws showed a significant reduction in risk of death; additionally, a beneficial effect of TS’s extended across all age groups. Other studies of regional TS’s have been done but are limited to single states or counties. This study has the advantages of a large sample size, geographic distribution of the states and the consideration given to other parameters that effect MVC related mortality. The limitations of this study include issues that could underestimate the effectiveness of trauma systems such as variations between states with and without trauma systems and the cross-sectional design gives no insight into the changes that occur with the evolution of trauma systems over time. Overall, the evaluation demonstrates that states with trauma systems have a 9{\%} reduction in global injury mortality with the greatest effect evident in MVC’s. The substantial costs and personnel associated with trauma systems are relatively insignificant when compared to the potential lives saved and the productivity gains equivalent to millions of dollars.",
author = "A. Nathen and Gregory Jurkovich and F. Rivara and R. Maier",
year = "2000",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "7",
journal = "Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses",
issn = "1078-7496",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effectiveness of state trauma systems in reducing injury’related mortality

T2 - A National Evaluation

AU - Nathen, A.

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

AU - Rivara, F.

AU - Maier, R.

PY - 2000/1/1

Y1 - 2000/1/1

N2 - The authors postulated that implementation of an organized system of trauma care would reduce injury-related mortality. In order to evaluate this hypothesis a national study was completed comparing injury mortality rates in states with and without a trauma system. Sources for information included the 1993 Inventory of Trauma Systems, Compressed Mortality Files of the National Center for Health Statistics and the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). All trauma systems (TS’s) in the inventory have at the minimum a legal authority, which involves the authority to designate trauma centers and to establish triage procedures that allow prehospital personnel to bypass nearer facilities. A total of 22 TS’s were implemented by 1995 and included in the study. Global injury mortality rates were lower in states with trauma systems. A reduction was also noted in deaths by unintentional injury. Motor vehicle crashes (MVC) account for the greatest majority of unintentional injuries and were found to have an 18% reduction of mortality in states with TS’s. The authors recognized that other factors might impact MVC related mortality that is separate from the presence of a trauma system. To analyze this age, speed limits, restraint laws and population distribution were evaluated. Higher speed limits were shown to have the highest increase in mortality; primary enforcement of restraint laws showed a significant reduction in risk of death; additionally, a beneficial effect of TS’s extended across all age groups. Other studies of regional TS’s have been done but are limited to single states or counties. This study has the advantages of a large sample size, geographic distribution of the states and the consideration given to other parameters that effect MVC related mortality. The limitations of this study include issues that could underestimate the effectiveness of trauma systems such as variations between states with and without trauma systems and the cross-sectional design gives no insight into the changes that occur with the evolution of trauma systems over time. Overall, the evaluation demonstrates that states with trauma systems have a 9% reduction in global injury mortality with the greatest effect evident in MVC’s. The substantial costs and personnel associated with trauma systems are relatively insignificant when compared to the potential lives saved and the productivity gains equivalent to millions of dollars.

AB - The authors postulated that implementation of an organized system of trauma care would reduce injury-related mortality. In order to evaluate this hypothesis a national study was completed comparing injury mortality rates in states with and without a trauma system. Sources for information included the 1993 Inventory of Trauma Systems, Compressed Mortality Files of the National Center for Health Statistics and the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS). All trauma systems (TS’s) in the inventory have at the minimum a legal authority, which involves the authority to designate trauma centers and to establish triage procedures that allow prehospital personnel to bypass nearer facilities. A total of 22 TS’s were implemented by 1995 and included in the study. Global injury mortality rates were lower in states with trauma systems. A reduction was also noted in deaths by unintentional injury. Motor vehicle crashes (MVC) account for the greatest majority of unintentional injuries and were found to have an 18% reduction of mortality in states with TS’s. The authors recognized that other factors might impact MVC related mortality that is separate from the presence of a trauma system. To analyze this age, speed limits, restraint laws and population distribution were evaluated. Higher speed limits were shown to have the highest increase in mortality; primary enforcement of restraint laws showed a significant reduction in risk of death; additionally, a beneficial effect of TS’s extended across all age groups. Other studies of regional TS’s have been done but are limited to single states or counties. This study has the advantages of a large sample size, geographic distribution of the states and the consideration given to other parameters that effect MVC related mortality. The limitations of this study include issues that could underestimate the effectiveness of trauma systems such as variations between states with and without trauma systems and the cross-sectional design gives no insight into the changes that occur with the evolution of trauma systems over time. Overall, the evaluation demonstrates that states with trauma systems have a 9% reduction in global injury mortality with the greatest effect evident in MVC’s. The substantial costs and personnel associated with trauma systems are relatively insignificant when compared to the potential lives saved and the productivity gains equivalent to millions of dollars.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026148504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026148504&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 7

JO - Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses

JF - Journal of trauma nursing : the official journal of the Society of Trauma Nurses

SN - 1078-7496

IS - 2

ER -