Effect of the transformation of the veterans affairs health care system on the quality of care

Ashish K. Jha, Jonathan B. Perlin, Kenneth W Kizer, R. Adams Dudley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

544 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the mid-1990s, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system initiated a systemwide reengineering to, among other things, improve its quality of care. We sought to determine the subsequent change in the quality ofhealth care and to compare the quality with that of the Medicare fee-for-service program. METHODS: Using data from an ongoing performance-evaluation program in the VA, we evaluated the quality ofpreventive, acute, and chronic care. We assessed the change in quality-of-care indicators from 1994 (before reengineering) through 2000 and compared the quality ofcare with that afforded by the Medicare fee- for-service system, using the same indicators of quality. RESULTS: In fiscal year 2000, throughout the VA system, the percentage ofpatients receiving appropriate care was 90 percent or greater for 9 of 17 quality-of-care indicators and exceeded 70 percent for 13 of 17 indicators. There were statistically significant improvements in quality from 1994-1995 through 2000 for all nine indicators thatwere collected in all years. As compared with the Medicare fee-for-service program, the VA performed significantly better on all 11 similar quality indicators for the period from 1997 through 1999. In 2000, the VA outperformed Medicare on 12 of 13 indicators. CONCLUSIONS: The quality ofcare in the VA health care system substantially improved after the implementation of a systemwide reengineering and, during the period from 1997 through 2000, was significantly better than that in the Medicare fee-for-service program. These data suggest that the quality-improvement initiatives adopted by the VA in the mid-1990s were effective.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2218-2227
Number of pages10
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume348
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - May 29 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Veterans Health
Quality of Health Care
Veterans
Fee-for-Service Plans
Medicare
Delivery of Health Care
Quality Improvement
Program Evaluation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Effect of the transformation of the veterans affairs health care system on the quality of care. / Jha, Ashish K.; Perlin, Jonathan B.; Kizer, Kenneth W; Dudley, R. Adams.

In: New England Journal of Medicine, Vol. 348, No. 22, 29.05.2003, p. 2218-2227.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Jha, Ashish K. ; Perlin, Jonathan B. ; Kizer, Kenneth W ; Dudley, R. Adams. / Effect of the transformation of the veterans affairs health care system on the quality of care. In: New England Journal of Medicine. 2003 ; Vol. 348, No. 22. pp. 2218-2227.
@article{3e61e9fb004545f09f86c05c73e6915d,
title = "Effect of the transformation of the veterans affairs health care system on the quality of care",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: In the mid-1990s, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system initiated a systemwide reengineering to, among other things, improve its quality of care. We sought to determine the subsequent change in the quality ofhealth care and to compare the quality with that of the Medicare fee-for-service program. METHODS: Using data from an ongoing performance-evaluation program in the VA, we evaluated the quality ofpreventive, acute, and chronic care. We assessed the change in quality-of-care indicators from 1994 (before reengineering) through 2000 and compared the quality ofcare with that afforded by the Medicare fee- for-service system, using the same indicators of quality. RESULTS: In fiscal year 2000, throughout the VA system, the percentage ofpatients receiving appropriate care was 90 percent or greater for 9 of 17 quality-of-care indicators and exceeded 70 percent for 13 of 17 indicators. There were statistically significant improvements in quality from 1994-1995 through 2000 for all nine indicators thatwere collected in all years. As compared with the Medicare fee-for-service program, the VA performed significantly better on all 11 similar quality indicators for the period from 1997 through 1999. In 2000, the VA outperformed Medicare on 12 of 13 indicators. CONCLUSIONS: The quality ofcare in the VA health care system substantially improved after the implementation of a systemwide reengineering and, during the period from 1997 through 2000, was significantly better than that in the Medicare fee-for-service program. These data suggest that the quality-improvement initiatives adopted by the VA in the mid-1990s were effective.",
author = "Jha, {Ashish K.} and Perlin, {Jonathan B.} and Kizer, {Kenneth W} and Dudley, {R. Adams}",
year = "2003",
month = "5",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1056/NEJMsa021899",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "348",
pages = "2218--2227",
journal = "New England Journal of Medicine",
issn = "0028-4793",
publisher = "Massachussetts Medical Society",
number = "22",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of the transformation of the veterans affairs health care system on the quality of care

AU - Jha, Ashish K.

AU - Perlin, Jonathan B.

AU - Kizer, Kenneth W

AU - Dudley, R. Adams

PY - 2003/5/29

Y1 - 2003/5/29

N2 - BACKGROUND: In the mid-1990s, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system initiated a systemwide reengineering to, among other things, improve its quality of care. We sought to determine the subsequent change in the quality ofhealth care and to compare the quality with that of the Medicare fee-for-service program. METHODS: Using data from an ongoing performance-evaluation program in the VA, we evaluated the quality ofpreventive, acute, and chronic care. We assessed the change in quality-of-care indicators from 1994 (before reengineering) through 2000 and compared the quality ofcare with that afforded by the Medicare fee- for-service system, using the same indicators of quality. RESULTS: In fiscal year 2000, throughout the VA system, the percentage ofpatients receiving appropriate care was 90 percent or greater for 9 of 17 quality-of-care indicators and exceeded 70 percent for 13 of 17 indicators. There were statistically significant improvements in quality from 1994-1995 through 2000 for all nine indicators thatwere collected in all years. As compared with the Medicare fee-for-service program, the VA performed significantly better on all 11 similar quality indicators for the period from 1997 through 1999. In 2000, the VA outperformed Medicare on 12 of 13 indicators. CONCLUSIONS: The quality ofcare in the VA health care system substantially improved after the implementation of a systemwide reengineering and, during the period from 1997 through 2000, was significantly better than that in the Medicare fee-for-service program. These data suggest that the quality-improvement initiatives adopted by the VA in the mid-1990s were effective.

AB - BACKGROUND: In the mid-1990s, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care system initiated a systemwide reengineering to, among other things, improve its quality of care. We sought to determine the subsequent change in the quality ofhealth care and to compare the quality with that of the Medicare fee-for-service program. METHODS: Using data from an ongoing performance-evaluation program in the VA, we evaluated the quality ofpreventive, acute, and chronic care. We assessed the change in quality-of-care indicators from 1994 (before reengineering) through 2000 and compared the quality ofcare with that afforded by the Medicare fee- for-service system, using the same indicators of quality. RESULTS: In fiscal year 2000, throughout the VA system, the percentage ofpatients receiving appropriate care was 90 percent or greater for 9 of 17 quality-of-care indicators and exceeded 70 percent for 13 of 17 indicators. There were statistically significant improvements in quality from 1994-1995 through 2000 for all nine indicators thatwere collected in all years. As compared with the Medicare fee-for-service program, the VA performed significantly better on all 11 similar quality indicators for the period from 1997 through 1999. In 2000, the VA outperformed Medicare on 12 of 13 indicators. CONCLUSIONS: The quality ofcare in the VA health care system substantially improved after the implementation of a systemwide reengineering and, during the period from 1997 through 2000, was significantly better than that in the Medicare fee-for-service program. These data suggest that the quality-improvement initiatives adopted by the VA in the mid-1990s were effective.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037849953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037849953&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1056/NEJMsa021899

DO - 10.1056/NEJMsa021899

M3 - Article

C2 - 12773650

AN - SCOPUS:0037849953

VL - 348

SP - 2218

EP - 2227

JO - New England Journal of Medicine

JF - New England Journal of Medicine

SN - 0028-4793

IS - 22

ER -