Effect of process standards on survival of patients with head and neck cancer in the south and west of England

M. Birchall, D. Bailey, P. King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

66 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare standards for the process of care and 2-year survival between two cohorts of patients with head and neck cancer in the south and west of England. A total of 566 and 727 patients presented in 1996-97 and 1999-2000, respectively. The median number of cases treated per surgeon was 4 (1997, range 1-26) and 4 (2000, 1-23) and per radiotherapist was 10 (1-51) and 19 (1-70). For all 'nontemporal' standards, the overall standard increased, without reaching minimum high targets, while most 'waiting times' increased. Overall 2-year survival was 64.1% in 1997 and 65.1% in 2000. There was no difference in survival between networks (range 56-68, 1997, log-rank test 4.1, P = 0.4; 62-69, 2000, log-rank test 1.26, P = 0.69). Patients assessed by a multidisciplinary clinic exhibited improved survival (1997: P = 0.1; 2000: hazard ratio 0.7, P = 0.02), as did those with a pretreatment chest X-ray (hazard ratio 0.7, P = 0.03). Despite an increased incidence, standards for the process of care for patients with head and neck cancer improved between 1996 and 2000, while waiting times increased and 2-year survival rates remained unaltered. Two out of five networks demonstrated centralisation of services between audits. Being seen in a multidisciplinary clinic correlated strongly with patient survival.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1477-1481
Number of pages5
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume91
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 18 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Head and Neck Neoplasms
England
Survival
Standard of Care
Thorax
Survival Rate
X-Rays
Incidence

Keywords

  • Head and neck cancer
  • Standards
  • Survival
  • Waiting times

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cancer Research
  • Oncology

Cite this

Effect of process standards on survival of patients with head and neck cancer in the south and west of England. / Birchall, M.; Bailey, D.; King, P.

In: British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 91, No. 8, 18.10.2004, p. 1477-1481.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{2c7a089be22c47698137e4226925d875,
title = "Effect of process standards on survival of patients with head and neck cancer in the south and west of England",
abstract = "The aim of the study was to compare standards for the process of care and 2-year survival between two cohorts of patients with head and neck cancer in the south and west of England. A total of 566 and 727 patients presented in 1996-97 and 1999-2000, respectively. The median number of cases treated per surgeon was 4 (1997, range 1-26) and 4 (2000, 1-23) and per radiotherapist was 10 (1-51) and 19 (1-70). For all 'nontemporal' standards, the overall standard increased, without reaching minimum high targets, while most 'waiting times' increased. Overall 2-year survival was 64.1{\%} in 1997 and 65.1{\%} in 2000. There was no difference in survival between networks (range 56-68, 1997, log-rank test 4.1, P = 0.4; 62-69, 2000, log-rank test 1.26, P = 0.69). Patients assessed by a multidisciplinary clinic exhibited improved survival (1997: P = 0.1; 2000: hazard ratio 0.7, P = 0.02), as did those with a pretreatment chest X-ray (hazard ratio 0.7, P = 0.03). Despite an increased incidence, standards for the process of care for patients with head and neck cancer improved between 1996 and 2000, while waiting times increased and 2-year survival rates remained unaltered. Two out of five networks demonstrated centralisation of services between audits. Being seen in a multidisciplinary clinic correlated strongly with patient survival.",
keywords = "Head and neck cancer, Standards, Survival, Waiting times",
author = "M. Birchall and D. Bailey and P. King",
year = "2004",
month = "10",
day = "18",
doi = "10.1038/sj.bjc.6602118",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "91",
pages = "1477--1481",
journal = "British Journal of Cancer",
issn = "0007-0920",
publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of process standards on survival of patients with head and neck cancer in the south and west of England

AU - Birchall, M.

AU - Bailey, D.

AU - King, P.

PY - 2004/10/18

Y1 - 2004/10/18

N2 - The aim of the study was to compare standards for the process of care and 2-year survival between two cohorts of patients with head and neck cancer in the south and west of England. A total of 566 and 727 patients presented in 1996-97 and 1999-2000, respectively. The median number of cases treated per surgeon was 4 (1997, range 1-26) and 4 (2000, 1-23) and per radiotherapist was 10 (1-51) and 19 (1-70). For all 'nontemporal' standards, the overall standard increased, without reaching minimum high targets, while most 'waiting times' increased. Overall 2-year survival was 64.1% in 1997 and 65.1% in 2000. There was no difference in survival between networks (range 56-68, 1997, log-rank test 4.1, P = 0.4; 62-69, 2000, log-rank test 1.26, P = 0.69). Patients assessed by a multidisciplinary clinic exhibited improved survival (1997: P = 0.1; 2000: hazard ratio 0.7, P = 0.02), as did those with a pretreatment chest X-ray (hazard ratio 0.7, P = 0.03). Despite an increased incidence, standards for the process of care for patients with head and neck cancer improved between 1996 and 2000, while waiting times increased and 2-year survival rates remained unaltered. Two out of five networks demonstrated centralisation of services between audits. Being seen in a multidisciplinary clinic correlated strongly with patient survival.

AB - The aim of the study was to compare standards for the process of care and 2-year survival between two cohorts of patients with head and neck cancer in the south and west of England. A total of 566 and 727 patients presented in 1996-97 and 1999-2000, respectively. The median number of cases treated per surgeon was 4 (1997, range 1-26) and 4 (2000, 1-23) and per radiotherapist was 10 (1-51) and 19 (1-70). For all 'nontemporal' standards, the overall standard increased, without reaching minimum high targets, while most 'waiting times' increased. Overall 2-year survival was 64.1% in 1997 and 65.1% in 2000. There was no difference in survival between networks (range 56-68, 1997, log-rank test 4.1, P = 0.4; 62-69, 2000, log-rank test 1.26, P = 0.69). Patients assessed by a multidisciplinary clinic exhibited improved survival (1997: P = 0.1; 2000: hazard ratio 0.7, P = 0.02), as did those with a pretreatment chest X-ray (hazard ratio 0.7, P = 0.03). Despite an increased incidence, standards for the process of care for patients with head and neck cancer improved between 1996 and 2000, while waiting times increased and 2-year survival rates remained unaltered. Two out of five networks demonstrated centralisation of services between audits. Being seen in a multidisciplinary clinic correlated strongly with patient survival.

KW - Head and neck cancer

KW - Standards

KW - Survival

KW - Waiting times

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=7944237080&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=7944237080&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602118

DO - 10.1038/sj.bjc.6602118

M3 - Article

VL - 91

SP - 1477

EP - 1481

JO - British Journal of Cancer

JF - British Journal of Cancer

SN - 0007-0920

IS - 8

ER -