Effect of Mailed Human Papillomavirus Test Kits vs Usual Care Reminders on Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake, Precancer Detection, and Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Rachel L. Winer, John Lin, Jasmin A. Tiro, Diana L. Miglioretti, Tara Beatty, Hongyuan Gao, Kilian Kimbel, Chris Thayer, Diana S.M. Buist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Importance: In the United States, more than 50% of cervical cancers are diagnosed in underscreened women. Cervical cancer screening guidelines now include primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as a recommended strategy. Home-based HPV self-sampling is a viable option for increasing screening compliance and effectiveness; however, US data are needed to inform health care system implementation. Objective: To evaluate effectiveness of mailed HPV self-sampling kits vs usual care reminders for in-clinic screening to increase detection and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and uptake of cervical cancer screening. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial conducted in Kaiser Permanente Washington, a US integrated health care delivery system. Women aged 30 to 64 years with health plan enrollment for 3 years and 5 months or more, a primary care clinician, no Papanicolaou test within 3 years and 5 months, and no hysterectomy were identified through electronic medical records and enrolled from February 25, 2014, to August 29, 2016, with follow-up through February 26, 2018. Interventions: The control group received usual care (annual patient reminders and ad hoc outreach from primary care clinics). The intervention group received usual care plus a mailed HPV self-sampling kit. Main Outcomes and Measures: Two primary outcomes were (1) CIN2+ detection within 6 months of screening and (2) treatment within 6 months of CIN2+ detection. Screening uptake within 6 months of randomization was a secondary outcome. Results: A total of 19 851 women (mean [SD] age, 50.1 [9.5] years) were included, with 9960 randomized to the intervention group and 9891 randomized to the control group. All women randomized were included in analysis. In the intervention group, 12 participants with CIN2+ were detected compared with 8 in the control group (relative risk, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.61-3.64) and 12 cases were treated vs 7 in the control group (relative risk, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.67-4.32). Screening uptake was higher in the intervention group (2618 participants [26.3%] vs 1719 participants [17.4%]; relative risk, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.43-1.60). Conclusions and Relevance: Mailing HPV kits to underscreened women increased screening uptake compared with usual care alone, with no significant differences in precancer detection or treatment. Results support the feasibility of mailing HPV kits to women who are overdue for screening as an outreach strategy to increase screening uptake in US health care systems. Efforts to increase kit uptake and follow-up of positive results are warranted to maximize detection and treatment of CIN2+. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02005510.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e1914729
JournalJAMA Network Open
Volume2
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2019

Fingerprint

Early Detection of Cancer
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Randomized Controlled Trials
Control Groups
Primary Health Care
Therapeutics
Integrated Delivery of Health Care
Delivery of Health Care
Papanicolaou Test
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Electronic Health Records
Random Allocation
Hysterectomy
Compliance
Patient Care
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Guidelines
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Effect of Mailed Human Papillomavirus Test Kits vs Usual Care Reminders on Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake, Precancer Detection, and Treatment : A Randomized Clinical Trial. / Winer, Rachel L.; Lin, John; Tiro, Jasmin A.; Miglioretti, Diana L.; Beatty, Tara; Gao, Hongyuan; Kimbel, Kilian; Thayer, Chris; Buist, Diana S.M.

In: JAMA Network Open, Vol. 2, No. 11, 01.11.2019, p. e1914729.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Winer, Rachel L. ; Lin, John ; Tiro, Jasmin A. ; Miglioretti, Diana L. ; Beatty, Tara ; Gao, Hongyuan ; Kimbel, Kilian ; Thayer, Chris ; Buist, Diana S.M. / Effect of Mailed Human Papillomavirus Test Kits vs Usual Care Reminders on Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake, Precancer Detection, and Treatment : A Randomized Clinical Trial. In: JAMA Network Open. 2019 ; Vol. 2, No. 11. pp. e1914729.
@article{7d07a1f0db584be39a332a43a29ba02a,
title = "Effect of Mailed Human Papillomavirus Test Kits vs Usual Care Reminders on Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake, Precancer Detection, and Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial",
abstract = "Importance: In the United States, more than 50{\%} of cervical cancers are diagnosed in underscreened women. Cervical cancer screening guidelines now include primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as a recommended strategy. Home-based HPV self-sampling is a viable option for increasing screening compliance and effectiveness; however, US data are needed to inform health care system implementation. Objective: To evaluate effectiveness of mailed HPV self-sampling kits vs usual care reminders for in-clinic screening to increase detection and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and uptake of cervical cancer screening. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial conducted in Kaiser Permanente Washington, a US integrated health care delivery system. Women aged 30 to 64 years with health plan enrollment for 3 years and 5 months or more, a primary care clinician, no Papanicolaou test within 3 years and 5 months, and no hysterectomy were identified through electronic medical records and enrolled from February 25, 2014, to August 29, 2016, with follow-up through February 26, 2018. Interventions: The control group received usual care (annual patient reminders and ad hoc outreach from primary care clinics). The intervention group received usual care plus a mailed HPV self-sampling kit. Main Outcomes and Measures: Two primary outcomes were (1) CIN2+ detection within 6 months of screening and (2) treatment within 6 months of CIN2+ detection. Screening uptake within 6 months of randomization was a secondary outcome. Results: A total of 19 851 women (mean [SD] age, 50.1 [9.5] years) were included, with 9960 randomized to the intervention group and 9891 randomized to the control group. All women randomized were included in analysis. In the intervention group, 12 participants with CIN2+ were detected compared with 8 in the control group (relative risk, 1.49; 95{\%} CI, 0.61-3.64) and 12 cases were treated vs 7 in the control group (relative risk, 1.70; 95{\%} CI, 0.67-4.32). Screening uptake was higher in the intervention group (2618 participants [26.3{\%}] vs 1719 participants [17.4{\%}]; relative risk, 1.51; 95{\%} CI, 1.43-1.60). Conclusions and Relevance: Mailing HPV kits to underscreened women increased screening uptake compared with usual care alone, with no significant differences in precancer detection or treatment. Results support the feasibility of mailing HPV kits to women who are overdue for screening as an outreach strategy to increase screening uptake in US health care systems. Efforts to increase kit uptake and follow-up of positive results are warranted to maximize detection and treatment of CIN2+. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02005510.",
author = "Winer, {Rachel L.} and John Lin and Tiro, {Jasmin A.} and Miglioretti, {Diana L.} and Tara Beatty and Hongyuan Gao and Kilian Kimbel and Chris Thayer and Buist, {Diana S.M.}",
year = "2019",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14729",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "e1914729",
journal = "JAMA network open",
issn = "2574-3805",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of Mailed Human Papillomavirus Test Kits vs Usual Care Reminders on Cervical Cancer Screening Uptake, Precancer Detection, and Treatment

T2 - A Randomized Clinical Trial

AU - Winer, Rachel L.

AU - Lin, John

AU - Tiro, Jasmin A.

AU - Miglioretti, Diana L.

AU - Beatty, Tara

AU - Gao, Hongyuan

AU - Kimbel, Kilian

AU - Thayer, Chris

AU - Buist, Diana S.M.

PY - 2019/11/1

Y1 - 2019/11/1

N2 - Importance: In the United States, more than 50% of cervical cancers are diagnosed in underscreened women. Cervical cancer screening guidelines now include primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as a recommended strategy. Home-based HPV self-sampling is a viable option for increasing screening compliance and effectiveness; however, US data are needed to inform health care system implementation. Objective: To evaluate effectiveness of mailed HPV self-sampling kits vs usual care reminders for in-clinic screening to increase detection and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and uptake of cervical cancer screening. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial conducted in Kaiser Permanente Washington, a US integrated health care delivery system. Women aged 30 to 64 years with health plan enrollment for 3 years and 5 months or more, a primary care clinician, no Papanicolaou test within 3 years and 5 months, and no hysterectomy were identified through electronic medical records and enrolled from February 25, 2014, to August 29, 2016, with follow-up through February 26, 2018. Interventions: The control group received usual care (annual patient reminders and ad hoc outreach from primary care clinics). The intervention group received usual care plus a mailed HPV self-sampling kit. Main Outcomes and Measures: Two primary outcomes were (1) CIN2+ detection within 6 months of screening and (2) treatment within 6 months of CIN2+ detection. Screening uptake within 6 months of randomization was a secondary outcome. Results: A total of 19 851 women (mean [SD] age, 50.1 [9.5] years) were included, with 9960 randomized to the intervention group and 9891 randomized to the control group. All women randomized were included in analysis. In the intervention group, 12 participants with CIN2+ were detected compared with 8 in the control group (relative risk, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.61-3.64) and 12 cases were treated vs 7 in the control group (relative risk, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.67-4.32). Screening uptake was higher in the intervention group (2618 participants [26.3%] vs 1719 participants [17.4%]; relative risk, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.43-1.60). Conclusions and Relevance: Mailing HPV kits to underscreened women increased screening uptake compared with usual care alone, with no significant differences in precancer detection or treatment. Results support the feasibility of mailing HPV kits to women who are overdue for screening as an outreach strategy to increase screening uptake in US health care systems. Efforts to increase kit uptake and follow-up of positive results are warranted to maximize detection and treatment of CIN2+. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02005510.

AB - Importance: In the United States, more than 50% of cervical cancers are diagnosed in underscreened women. Cervical cancer screening guidelines now include primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing as a recommended strategy. Home-based HPV self-sampling is a viable option for increasing screening compliance and effectiveness; however, US data are needed to inform health care system implementation. Objective: To evaluate effectiveness of mailed HPV self-sampling kits vs usual care reminders for in-clinic screening to increase detection and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) and uptake of cervical cancer screening. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized clinical trial conducted in Kaiser Permanente Washington, a US integrated health care delivery system. Women aged 30 to 64 years with health plan enrollment for 3 years and 5 months or more, a primary care clinician, no Papanicolaou test within 3 years and 5 months, and no hysterectomy were identified through electronic medical records and enrolled from February 25, 2014, to August 29, 2016, with follow-up through February 26, 2018. Interventions: The control group received usual care (annual patient reminders and ad hoc outreach from primary care clinics). The intervention group received usual care plus a mailed HPV self-sampling kit. Main Outcomes and Measures: Two primary outcomes were (1) CIN2+ detection within 6 months of screening and (2) treatment within 6 months of CIN2+ detection. Screening uptake within 6 months of randomization was a secondary outcome. Results: A total of 19 851 women (mean [SD] age, 50.1 [9.5] years) were included, with 9960 randomized to the intervention group and 9891 randomized to the control group. All women randomized were included in analysis. In the intervention group, 12 participants with CIN2+ were detected compared with 8 in the control group (relative risk, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.61-3.64) and 12 cases were treated vs 7 in the control group (relative risk, 1.70; 95% CI, 0.67-4.32). Screening uptake was higher in the intervention group (2618 participants [26.3%] vs 1719 participants [17.4%]; relative risk, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.43-1.60). Conclusions and Relevance: Mailing HPV kits to underscreened women increased screening uptake compared with usual care alone, with no significant differences in precancer detection or treatment. Results support the feasibility of mailing HPV kits to women who are overdue for screening as an outreach strategy to increase screening uptake in US health care systems. Efforts to increase kit uptake and follow-up of positive results are warranted to maximize detection and treatment of CIN2+. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02005510.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074742245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074742245&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14729

DO - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.14729

M3 - Article

C2 - 31693128

AN - SCOPUS:85074742245

VL - 2

SP - e1914729

JO - JAMA network open

JF - JAMA network open

SN - 2574-3805

IS - 11

ER -