Effect of heated and humidified carbon dioxide gas on core temperature and postoperative pain

A randomized trial

N. T. Nguyen, G. Furdui, Neal Fleming, S. J. Lee, C. D. Goldman, A. Singh, B. M. Wolfe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Intraoperative hypothermia is a common event during laparoscopic operations. An external warming blanket has been shown to be effective in preventing hypothermia. It has now been proposed that using heated and humidified insufflation gas can prevent hypothermia and decrease postoperative pain. Therefore, we examined the extent of intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication using an upper body warming blanket. We also attempted to determine whether using heated and humidified insufflation gas in addition to an external warming blanket would help to maintain intraoperative core temperature or decrease postoperative pain. Methods: Twenty patients were randomized to receive either standard carbon dioxide (CO2) gas (control, n = 10) or heated and humidified gas (heated and humidified, n = 10). After the induction of anesthesia, an external warming blanket was placed on all patients in both groups. Intraoperative core temperature and intraabdominal temperature were measured at 15-min intervals. Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using a visual analogue pain scale, and the amount of analgesic consumption was recorded. Volume of gas delivered, number of lens-fogging episodes, intraoperative urine output, and hemodynamic data were also recorded. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, length of operation, or volume of CO2 gas delivered. Compared with baseline value, mean core temperature increased by 0.4°C in the heated and humidified group and by 0.3°C in the control group at 1.5 h after surgical incision. Intraabdominal temperature increased by 0.2°C in the heated and humidified group but decreased by 0.5°C in the control group at 1.5 h after abdominal insufflation. There was no significant difference between the two groups in visual analog pain scale (5.4 ± 1.6 control vs 4.5 ± 2.8 heated and humidified), morphine consumed (27 ± 26 mg control vs 32 ± 19 mg heated and humidified), urine output, lensfogging episodes, or hemodynamic parameters. Conclusion: Heated and humidified gas, when used in addition to an external warming blanket, minimized the reduction of intraabdominal temperature but did not alter core temperature or reduce postoperative pain.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1050-1054
Number of pages5
JournalSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques
Volume16
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Fingerprint

Postoperative Pain
Carbon Dioxide
Gases
Temperature
Hypothermia
Insufflation
Pain Measurement
Hemodynamics
Urine
Fundoplication
Control Groups
Morphine
Lenses
Analgesics
Anesthesia
Age Groups

Keywords

  • Core temperature
  • Hypothermia
  • Laparoscopic surgery
  • Postoperative pain
  • Warming device

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Effect of heated and humidified carbon dioxide gas on core temperature and postoperative pain : A randomized trial. / Nguyen, N. T.; Furdui, G.; Fleming, Neal; Lee, S. J.; Goldman, C. D.; Singh, A.; Wolfe, B. M.

In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques, Vol. 16, No. 7, 2002, p. 1050-1054.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Nguyen, N. T. ; Furdui, G. ; Fleming, Neal ; Lee, S. J. ; Goldman, C. D. ; Singh, A. ; Wolfe, B. M. / Effect of heated and humidified carbon dioxide gas on core temperature and postoperative pain : A randomized trial. In: Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques. 2002 ; Vol. 16, No. 7. pp. 1050-1054.
@article{c12c9b29dc174497be039b515b15c397,
title = "Effect of heated and humidified carbon dioxide gas on core temperature and postoperative pain: A randomized trial",
abstract = "Background: Intraoperative hypothermia is a common event during laparoscopic operations. An external warming blanket has been shown to be effective in preventing hypothermia. It has now been proposed that using heated and humidified insufflation gas can prevent hypothermia and decrease postoperative pain. Therefore, we examined the extent of intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication using an upper body warming blanket. We also attempted to determine whether using heated and humidified insufflation gas in addition to an external warming blanket would help to maintain intraoperative core temperature or decrease postoperative pain. Methods: Twenty patients were randomized to receive either standard carbon dioxide (CO2) gas (control, n = 10) or heated and humidified gas (heated and humidified, n = 10). After the induction of anesthesia, an external warming blanket was placed on all patients in both groups. Intraoperative core temperature and intraabdominal temperature were measured at 15-min intervals. Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using a visual analogue pain scale, and the amount of analgesic consumption was recorded. Volume of gas delivered, number of lens-fogging episodes, intraoperative urine output, and hemodynamic data were also recorded. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, length of operation, or volume of CO2 gas delivered. Compared with baseline value, mean core temperature increased by 0.4°C in the heated and humidified group and by 0.3°C in the control group at 1.5 h after surgical incision. Intraabdominal temperature increased by 0.2°C in the heated and humidified group but decreased by 0.5°C in the control group at 1.5 h after abdominal insufflation. There was no significant difference between the two groups in visual analog pain scale (5.4 ± 1.6 control vs 4.5 ± 2.8 heated and humidified), morphine consumed (27 ± 26 mg control vs 32 ± 19 mg heated and humidified), urine output, lensfogging episodes, or hemodynamic parameters. Conclusion: Heated and humidified gas, when used in addition to an external warming blanket, minimized the reduction of intraabdominal temperature but did not alter core temperature or reduce postoperative pain.",
keywords = "Core temperature, Hypothermia, Laparoscopic surgery, Postoperative pain, Warming device",
author = "Nguyen, {N. T.} and G. Furdui and Neal Fleming and Lee, {S. J.} and Goldman, {C. D.} and A. Singh and Wolfe, {B. M.}",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1007/s00464-001-8237-0",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "1050--1054",
journal = "Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques",
issn = "0930-2794",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of heated and humidified carbon dioxide gas on core temperature and postoperative pain

T2 - A randomized trial

AU - Nguyen, N. T.

AU - Furdui, G.

AU - Fleming, Neal

AU - Lee, S. J.

AU - Goldman, C. D.

AU - Singh, A.

AU - Wolfe, B. M.

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - Background: Intraoperative hypothermia is a common event during laparoscopic operations. An external warming blanket has been shown to be effective in preventing hypothermia. It has now been proposed that using heated and humidified insufflation gas can prevent hypothermia and decrease postoperative pain. Therefore, we examined the extent of intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication using an upper body warming blanket. We also attempted to determine whether using heated and humidified insufflation gas in addition to an external warming blanket would help to maintain intraoperative core temperature or decrease postoperative pain. Methods: Twenty patients were randomized to receive either standard carbon dioxide (CO2) gas (control, n = 10) or heated and humidified gas (heated and humidified, n = 10). After the induction of anesthesia, an external warming blanket was placed on all patients in both groups. Intraoperative core temperature and intraabdominal temperature were measured at 15-min intervals. Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using a visual analogue pain scale, and the amount of analgesic consumption was recorded. Volume of gas delivered, number of lens-fogging episodes, intraoperative urine output, and hemodynamic data were also recorded. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, length of operation, or volume of CO2 gas delivered. Compared with baseline value, mean core temperature increased by 0.4°C in the heated and humidified group and by 0.3°C in the control group at 1.5 h after surgical incision. Intraabdominal temperature increased by 0.2°C in the heated and humidified group but decreased by 0.5°C in the control group at 1.5 h after abdominal insufflation. There was no significant difference between the two groups in visual analog pain scale (5.4 ± 1.6 control vs 4.5 ± 2.8 heated and humidified), morphine consumed (27 ± 26 mg control vs 32 ± 19 mg heated and humidified), urine output, lensfogging episodes, or hemodynamic parameters. Conclusion: Heated and humidified gas, when used in addition to an external warming blanket, minimized the reduction of intraabdominal temperature but did not alter core temperature or reduce postoperative pain.

AB - Background: Intraoperative hypothermia is a common event during laparoscopic operations. An external warming blanket has been shown to be effective in preventing hypothermia. It has now been proposed that using heated and humidified insufflation gas can prevent hypothermia and decrease postoperative pain. Therefore, we examined the extent of intraoperative hypothermia in patients undergoing laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication using an upper body warming blanket. We also attempted to determine whether using heated and humidified insufflation gas in addition to an external warming blanket would help to maintain intraoperative core temperature or decrease postoperative pain. Methods: Twenty patients were randomized to receive either standard carbon dioxide (CO2) gas (control, n = 10) or heated and humidified gas (heated and humidified, n = 10). After the induction of anesthesia, an external warming blanket was placed on all patients in both groups. Intraoperative core temperature and intraabdominal temperature were measured at 15-min intervals. Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using a visual analogue pain scale, and the amount of analgesic consumption was recorded. Volume of gas delivered, number of lens-fogging episodes, intraoperative urine output, and hemodynamic data were also recorded. Results: There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, length of operation, or volume of CO2 gas delivered. Compared with baseline value, mean core temperature increased by 0.4°C in the heated and humidified group and by 0.3°C in the control group at 1.5 h after surgical incision. Intraabdominal temperature increased by 0.2°C in the heated and humidified group but decreased by 0.5°C in the control group at 1.5 h after abdominal insufflation. There was no significant difference between the two groups in visual analog pain scale (5.4 ± 1.6 control vs 4.5 ± 2.8 heated and humidified), morphine consumed (27 ± 26 mg control vs 32 ± 19 mg heated and humidified), urine output, lensfogging episodes, or hemodynamic parameters. Conclusion: Heated and humidified gas, when used in addition to an external warming blanket, minimized the reduction of intraabdominal temperature but did not alter core temperature or reduce postoperative pain.

KW - Core temperature

KW - Hypothermia

KW - Laparoscopic surgery

KW - Postoperative pain

KW - Warming device

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036302198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036302198&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00464-001-8237-0

DO - 10.1007/s00464-001-8237-0

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 1050

EP - 1054

JO - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

JF - Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

SN - 0930-2794

IS - 7

ER -