Effect of brucellosis vaccination and dehorning on transmission of bovine leukemia virus in heifers on a California dairy.

M. L. Lassauzet, Mark Thurmond, W. O. Johnson, F. Stevens, J. P. Picanso

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Brucellosis vaccination and dehorning were examined for an association with bovine leukemia virus (BLV) infection in heifers on a California dairy between April 1984 and June 1987. Between December 1985 and June 1986, weaned heifers were dehorned using the gouge method at the time of brucellosis vaccination. Using logistic regression, the estimated probability for a nondehorned heifer to seroconvert within three months after brucellosis vaccination (0.08) was significantly less than that for heifers dehorned after a noninfected heifer (0.46) or than that for heifers dehorned after an infected heifer (0.85) (p = 0.039 and p less than 0.001, respectively). To evaluate risk of transmission by brucellosis vaccination, which was usually done within one month postweaning, cumulative proportions of heifers remaining uninfected were computed among heifers that did not seroconvert three months after dehorning. Because results of a Cox model analysis indicated that groups of heifers were 6.6 times more at risk of becoming infected if placed in pens holding gouge-dehorned heifers (where prevalence varied between 50 and 70%) (p less than 0.001) than other groups placed in pens without gouge-dehorned heifers (where prevalence varied between 10 and 30%), cumulative proportions of heifers remaining uninfected were computed for each type of group. The cumulative proportion of heifers remaining uninfected from weaning to first calving was 0.60 for the high prevalence group and 0.96 for the low prevalence group. No change in slope of cumulative proportions was observed before and after one month postweaning, suggesting that brucellosis vaccination was not an effective means of transmission.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)184-189
Number of pages6
JournalCanadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire
Volume54
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 1 1990

Fingerprint

dehorning
Bovine Leukemia Virus
Bovine leukemia virus
Brucellosis
brucellosis
heifers
dairies
Vaccination
vaccination
Virus Diseases
Weaning
Proportional Hazards Models
Logistic Models

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Effect of brucellosis vaccination and dehorning on transmission of bovine leukemia virus in heifers on a California dairy. / Lassauzet, M. L.; Thurmond, Mark; Johnson, W. O.; Stevens, F.; Picanso, J. P.

In: Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire, Vol. 54, No. 1, 01.01.1990, p. 184-189.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{0e67e577df8547b99306c061accfa990,
title = "Effect of brucellosis vaccination and dehorning on transmission of bovine leukemia virus in heifers on a California dairy.",
abstract = "Brucellosis vaccination and dehorning were examined for an association with bovine leukemia virus (BLV) infection in heifers on a California dairy between April 1984 and June 1987. Between December 1985 and June 1986, weaned heifers were dehorned using the gouge method at the time of brucellosis vaccination. Using logistic regression, the estimated probability for a nondehorned heifer to seroconvert within three months after brucellosis vaccination (0.08) was significantly less than that for heifers dehorned after a noninfected heifer (0.46) or than that for heifers dehorned after an infected heifer (0.85) (p = 0.039 and p less than 0.001, respectively). To evaluate risk of transmission by brucellosis vaccination, which was usually done within one month postweaning, cumulative proportions of heifers remaining uninfected were computed among heifers that did not seroconvert three months after dehorning. Because results of a Cox model analysis indicated that groups of heifers were 6.6 times more at risk of becoming infected if placed in pens holding gouge-dehorned heifers (where prevalence varied between 50 and 70{\%}) (p less than 0.001) than other groups placed in pens without gouge-dehorned heifers (where prevalence varied between 10 and 30{\%}), cumulative proportions of heifers remaining uninfected were computed for each type of group. The cumulative proportion of heifers remaining uninfected from weaning to first calving was 0.60 for the high prevalence group and 0.96 for the low prevalence group. No change in slope of cumulative proportions was observed before and after one month postweaning, suggesting that brucellosis vaccination was not an effective means of transmission.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)",
author = "Lassauzet, {M. L.} and Mark Thurmond and Johnson, {W. O.} and F. Stevens and Picanso, {J. P.}",
year = "1990",
month = "1",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "184--189",
journal = "Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research",
issn = "0830-9000",
publisher = "Canadian Veterinary Medical Association",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of brucellosis vaccination and dehorning on transmission of bovine leukemia virus in heifers on a California dairy.

AU - Lassauzet, M. L.

AU - Thurmond, Mark

AU - Johnson, W. O.

AU - Stevens, F.

AU - Picanso, J. P.

PY - 1990/1/1

Y1 - 1990/1/1

N2 - Brucellosis vaccination and dehorning were examined for an association with bovine leukemia virus (BLV) infection in heifers on a California dairy between April 1984 and June 1987. Between December 1985 and June 1986, weaned heifers were dehorned using the gouge method at the time of brucellosis vaccination. Using logistic regression, the estimated probability for a nondehorned heifer to seroconvert within three months after brucellosis vaccination (0.08) was significantly less than that for heifers dehorned after a noninfected heifer (0.46) or than that for heifers dehorned after an infected heifer (0.85) (p = 0.039 and p less than 0.001, respectively). To evaluate risk of transmission by brucellosis vaccination, which was usually done within one month postweaning, cumulative proportions of heifers remaining uninfected were computed among heifers that did not seroconvert three months after dehorning. Because results of a Cox model analysis indicated that groups of heifers were 6.6 times more at risk of becoming infected if placed in pens holding gouge-dehorned heifers (where prevalence varied between 50 and 70%) (p less than 0.001) than other groups placed in pens without gouge-dehorned heifers (where prevalence varied between 10 and 30%), cumulative proportions of heifers remaining uninfected were computed for each type of group. The cumulative proportion of heifers remaining uninfected from weaning to first calving was 0.60 for the high prevalence group and 0.96 for the low prevalence group. No change in slope of cumulative proportions was observed before and after one month postweaning, suggesting that brucellosis vaccination was not an effective means of transmission.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

AB - Brucellosis vaccination and dehorning were examined for an association with bovine leukemia virus (BLV) infection in heifers on a California dairy between April 1984 and June 1987. Between December 1985 and June 1986, weaned heifers were dehorned using the gouge method at the time of brucellosis vaccination. Using logistic regression, the estimated probability for a nondehorned heifer to seroconvert within three months after brucellosis vaccination (0.08) was significantly less than that for heifers dehorned after a noninfected heifer (0.46) or than that for heifers dehorned after an infected heifer (0.85) (p = 0.039 and p less than 0.001, respectively). To evaluate risk of transmission by brucellosis vaccination, which was usually done within one month postweaning, cumulative proportions of heifers remaining uninfected were computed among heifers that did not seroconvert three months after dehorning. Because results of a Cox model analysis indicated that groups of heifers were 6.6 times more at risk of becoming infected if placed in pens holding gouge-dehorned heifers (where prevalence varied between 50 and 70%) (p less than 0.001) than other groups placed in pens without gouge-dehorned heifers (where prevalence varied between 10 and 30%), cumulative proportions of heifers remaining uninfected were computed for each type of group. The cumulative proportion of heifers remaining uninfected from weaning to first calving was 0.60 for the high prevalence group and 0.96 for the low prevalence group. No change in slope of cumulative proportions was observed before and after one month postweaning, suggesting that brucellosis vaccination was not an effective means of transmission.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0024985485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0024985485&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 2155048

AN - SCOPUS:0024985485

VL - 54

SP - 184

EP - 189

JO - Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research

JF - Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research

SN - 0830-9000

IS - 1

ER -