Effect of a curfew law on juvenile trauma

David V Shatz, Chi Zhang, Mark McGrath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: As a method of crime reduction among teenagers, several cities, counties, and states across the country have enacted, or attempted to enact, curfew laws. A curfew law was successfully implemented in Dade County, Florida, in January of 1996. Although its efficacy for crime reduction has been questioned, its benefit for trauma prevention may be real. Methods: Trauma registry data was collected retrospectively and prospectively from Dade County's Level I trauma center for all trauma victims 5 to 16 years of age. The time period spanned the 2 years before the institution of the curfew law (January 1, 1996) and the 2 years after. Total adult and pediatric trauma volumes during the 4-year period were used as comparisons, as well as juvenile traumas occurring during noncurfew hours. Results: Total trauma volume did not change significantly across the 4-year period, nor did the volume among the curfew age group during noncurfew hours. The predominant mechanisms of injury during curfew hours were motor vehicle crashes and gunshots. Neither the patterns of mechanisms nor ages changed significantly during the precurfew and postcurfew eras. However, the volume of cases seen at the trauma center among the curfew age group was significantly lower with the curfew law in effect (mean, 7.0/month) than before it was in effect (mean, 9.5/month, p = 0.043). Conclusion: Although the overall trauma admissions and juvenile trauma admissions during the noncurfew hours remained relatively stable, juvenile trauma admissions during curfew hours dropped significantly in the 2 years after enforcement of the curfew law compared with the 2 years before the curfew law. This finding suggests that attempts to prevent late-night nonproductive street presence among teens can decrease the incidence of trauma occurrences.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1013-1017
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume47
Issue number6
StatePublished - Dec 1999
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Wounds and Injuries
Trauma Centers
Crime
Age Groups
Law Enforcement
Motor Vehicles
Registries
Pediatrics
Incidence

Keywords

  • Curfew
  • Juvenile trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Effect of a curfew law on juvenile trauma. / Shatz, David V; Zhang, Chi; McGrath, Mark.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 47, No. 6, 12.1999, p. 1013-1017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Shatz, David V ; Zhang, Chi ; McGrath, Mark. / Effect of a curfew law on juvenile trauma. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 1999 ; Vol. 47, No. 6. pp. 1013-1017.
@article{81328ec7c49e462994c6c2d566e144b2,
title = "Effect of a curfew law on juvenile trauma",
abstract = "Objective: As a method of crime reduction among teenagers, several cities, counties, and states across the country have enacted, or attempted to enact, curfew laws. A curfew law was successfully implemented in Dade County, Florida, in January of 1996. Although its efficacy for crime reduction has been questioned, its benefit for trauma prevention may be real. Methods: Trauma registry data was collected retrospectively and prospectively from Dade County's Level I trauma center for all trauma victims 5 to 16 years of age. The time period spanned the 2 years before the institution of the curfew law (January 1, 1996) and the 2 years after. Total adult and pediatric trauma volumes during the 4-year period were used as comparisons, as well as juvenile traumas occurring during noncurfew hours. Results: Total trauma volume did not change significantly across the 4-year period, nor did the volume among the curfew age group during noncurfew hours. The predominant mechanisms of injury during curfew hours were motor vehicle crashes and gunshots. Neither the patterns of mechanisms nor ages changed significantly during the precurfew and postcurfew eras. However, the volume of cases seen at the trauma center among the curfew age group was significantly lower with the curfew law in effect (mean, 7.0/month) than before it was in effect (mean, 9.5/month, p = 0.043). Conclusion: Although the overall trauma admissions and juvenile trauma admissions during the noncurfew hours remained relatively stable, juvenile trauma admissions during curfew hours dropped significantly in the 2 years after enforcement of the curfew law compared with the 2 years before the curfew law. This finding suggests that attempts to prevent late-night nonproductive street presence among teens can decrease the incidence of trauma occurrences.",
keywords = "Curfew, Juvenile trauma",
author = "Shatz, {David V} and Chi Zhang and Mark McGrath",
year = "1999",
month = "12",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "1013--1017",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Effect of a curfew law on juvenile trauma

AU - Shatz, David V

AU - Zhang, Chi

AU - McGrath, Mark

PY - 1999/12

Y1 - 1999/12

N2 - Objective: As a method of crime reduction among teenagers, several cities, counties, and states across the country have enacted, or attempted to enact, curfew laws. A curfew law was successfully implemented in Dade County, Florida, in January of 1996. Although its efficacy for crime reduction has been questioned, its benefit for trauma prevention may be real. Methods: Trauma registry data was collected retrospectively and prospectively from Dade County's Level I trauma center for all trauma victims 5 to 16 years of age. The time period spanned the 2 years before the institution of the curfew law (January 1, 1996) and the 2 years after. Total adult and pediatric trauma volumes during the 4-year period were used as comparisons, as well as juvenile traumas occurring during noncurfew hours. Results: Total trauma volume did not change significantly across the 4-year period, nor did the volume among the curfew age group during noncurfew hours. The predominant mechanisms of injury during curfew hours were motor vehicle crashes and gunshots. Neither the patterns of mechanisms nor ages changed significantly during the precurfew and postcurfew eras. However, the volume of cases seen at the trauma center among the curfew age group was significantly lower with the curfew law in effect (mean, 7.0/month) than before it was in effect (mean, 9.5/month, p = 0.043). Conclusion: Although the overall trauma admissions and juvenile trauma admissions during the noncurfew hours remained relatively stable, juvenile trauma admissions during curfew hours dropped significantly in the 2 years after enforcement of the curfew law compared with the 2 years before the curfew law. This finding suggests that attempts to prevent late-night nonproductive street presence among teens can decrease the incidence of trauma occurrences.

AB - Objective: As a method of crime reduction among teenagers, several cities, counties, and states across the country have enacted, or attempted to enact, curfew laws. A curfew law was successfully implemented in Dade County, Florida, in January of 1996. Although its efficacy for crime reduction has been questioned, its benefit for trauma prevention may be real. Methods: Trauma registry data was collected retrospectively and prospectively from Dade County's Level I trauma center for all trauma victims 5 to 16 years of age. The time period spanned the 2 years before the institution of the curfew law (January 1, 1996) and the 2 years after. Total adult and pediatric trauma volumes during the 4-year period were used as comparisons, as well as juvenile traumas occurring during noncurfew hours. Results: Total trauma volume did not change significantly across the 4-year period, nor did the volume among the curfew age group during noncurfew hours. The predominant mechanisms of injury during curfew hours were motor vehicle crashes and gunshots. Neither the patterns of mechanisms nor ages changed significantly during the precurfew and postcurfew eras. However, the volume of cases seen at the trauma center among the curfew age group was significantly lower with the curfew law in effect (mean, 7.0/month) than before it was in effect (mean, 9.5/month, p = 0.043). Conclusion: Although the overall trauma admissions and juvenile trauma admissions during the noncurfew hours remained relatively stable, juvenile trauma admissions during curfew hours dropped significantly in the 2 years after enforcement of the curfew law compared with the 2 years before the curfew law. This finding suggests that attempts to prevent late-night nonproductive street presence among teens can decrease the incidence of trauma occurrences.

KW - Curfew

KW - Juvenile trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033432853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0033432853&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 10608527

AN - SCOPUS:0033432853

VL - 47

SP - 1013

EP - 1017

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 6

ER -