Education and other measures of socioeconomic status and risk of incident Alzheimer disease in a defined population of older persons

Denis A. Evans, Liesi E. Hebert, Laurel A Beckett, Paul A. Scherr, Marilyn S. Albert, Marilyn J. Chown, David M. Pilgrim, James O. Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

295 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess the relations of 3 measures of socioeconomic status (education, occupational prestige, and income) to risk of incident clinically diagnosed Alzheimer disease (AD). Design: Cohort study with an average observation of 4.3 years. Setting: East Boston, Mass, a geographically defined community. Participants: A stratified random sample of 642 community residents 65 years of age and older who were free of AD at baseline. Main Outcome Measure: Clinical diagnosis of probable AD according to standard criteria, using structured uniform evaluation. Results: The relations of the 3 measures of socioeconomic status to risk of disease were assessed using logistic regression analyses. In individual analyses, fewer years of formal schooling, lower income, and lower occupational status each predicted risk of incident AD; risk of disease decreased by approximately 17% for each year of education. In an analysis including all 3 measures, the effect of education on risk for disease remained approximately the same, but the effects of the other 2 measures were somewhat less and did not attain formal statistical significance, compared with separate analysis of each measure. Conclusions: Markers of lower socioeconomic status predict risk of developing incident AD. The mechanism of this relation is uncertain, but the possibility that it reflects unidentified and potentially reversible risk factors for the disease deserves careful investigation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1399-1405
Number of pages7
JournalArchives of Neurology
Volume54
Issue number11
StatePublished - Nov 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Social Class
Alzheimer Disease
Education
Population
Alzheimer's Disease
Person
Socioeconomic Status
Cohort Studies
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Observation
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Income

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Evans, D. A., Hebert, L. E., Beckett, L. A., Scherr, P. A., Albert, M. S., Chown, M. J., ... Taylor, J. O. (1997). Education and other measures of socioeconomic status and risk of incident Alzheimer disease in a defined population of older persons. Archives of Neurology, 54(11), 1399-1405.

Education and other measures of socioeconomic status and risk of incident Alzheimer disease in a defined population of older persons. / Evans, Denis A.; Hebert, Liesi E.; Beckett, Laurel A; Scherr, Paul A.; Albert, Marilyn S.; Chown, Marilyn J.; Pilgrim, David M.; Taylor, James O.

In: Archives of Neurology, Vol. 54, No. 11, 11.1997, p. 1399-1405.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Evans, DA, Hebert, LE, Beckett, LA, Scherr, PA, Albert, MS, Chown, MJ, Pilgrim, DM & Taylor, JO 1997, 'Education and other measures of socioeconomic status and risk of incident Alzheimer disease in a defined population of older persons', Archives of Neurology, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 1399-1405.
Evans, Denis A. ; Hebert, Liesi E. ; Beckett, Laurel A ; Scherr, Paul A. ; Albert, Marilyn S. ; Chown, Marilyn J. ; Pilgrim, David M. ; Taylor, James O. / Education and other measures of socioeconomic status and risk of incident Alzheimer disease in a defined population of older persons. In: Archives of Neurology. 1997 ; Vol. 54, No. 11. pp. 1399-1405.
@article{3eff22c0e96c49309ae80b801fa75148,
title = "Education and other measures of socioeconomic status and risk of incident Alzheimer disease in a defined population of older persons",
abstract = "Objective: To assess the relations of 3 measures of socioeconomic status (education, occupational prestige, and income) to risk of incident clinically diagnosed Alzheimer disease (AD). Design: Cohort study with an average observation of 4.3 years. Setting: East Boston, Mass, a geographically defined community. Participants: A stratified random sample of 642 community residents 65 years of age and older who were free of AD at baseline. Main Outcome Measure: Clinical diagnosis of probable AD according to standard criteria, using structured uniform evaluation. Results: The relations of the 3 measures of socioeconomic status to risk of disease were assessed using logistic regression analyses. In individual analyses, fewer years of formal schooling, lower income, and lower occupational status each predicted risk of incident AD; risk of disease decreased by approximately 17{\%} for each year of education. In an analysis including all 3 measures, the effect of education on risk for disease remained approximately the same, but the effects of the other 2 measures were somewhat less and did not attain formal statistical significance, compared with separate analysis of each measure. Conclusions: Markers of lower socioeconomic status predict risk of developing incident AD. The mechanism of this relation is uncertain, but the possibility that it reflects unidentified and potentially reversible risk factors for the disease deserves careful investigation.",
author = "Evans, {Denis A.} and Hebert, {Liesi E.} and Beckett, {Laurel A} and Scherr, {Paul A.} and Albert, {Marilyn S.} and Chown, {Marilyn J.} and Pilgrim, {David M.} and Taylor, {James O.}",
year = "1997",
month = "11",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "1399--1405",
journal = "Archives of Neurology",
issn = "0003-9942",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Education and other measures of socioeconomic status and risk of incident Alzheimer disease in a defined population of older persons

AU - Evans, Denis A.

AU - Hebert, Liesi E.

AU - Beckett, Laurel A

AU - Scherr, Paul A.

AU - Albert, Marilyn S.

AU - Chown, Marilyn J.

AU - Pilgrim, David M.

AU - Taylor, James O.

PY - 1997/11

Y1 - 1997/11

N2 - Objective: To assess the relations of 3 measures of socioeconomic status (education, occupational prestige, and income) to risk of incident clinically diagnosed Alzheimer disease (AD). Design: Cohort study with an average observation of 4.3 years. Setting: East Boston, Mass, a geographically defined community. Participants: A stratified random sample of 642 community residents 65 years of age and older who were free of AD at baseline. Main Outcome Measure: Clinical diagnosis of probable AD according to standard criteria, using structured uniform evaluation. Results: The relations of the 3 measures of socioeconomic status to risk of disease were assessed using logistic regression analyses. In individual analyses, fewer years of formal schooling, lower income, and lower occupational status each predicted risk of incident AD; risk of disease decreased by approximately 17% for each year of education. In an analysis including all 3 measures, the effect of education on risk for disease remained approximately the same, but the effects of the other 2 measures were somewhat less and did not attain formal statistical significance, compared with separate analysis of each measure. Conclusions: Markers of lower socioeconomic status predict risk of developing incident AD. The mechanism of this relation is uncertain, but the possibility that it reflects unidentified and potentially reversible risk factors for the disease deserves careful investigation.

AB - Objective: To assess the relations of 3 measures of socioeconomic status (education, occupational prestige, and income) to risk of incident clinically diagnosed Alzheimer disease (AD). Design: Cohort study with an average observation of 4.3 years. Setting: East Boston, Mass, a geographically defined community. Participants: A stratified random sample of 642 community residents 65 years of age and older who were free of AD at baseline. Main Outcome Measure: Clinical diagnosis of probable AD according to standard criteria, using structured uniform evaluation. Results: The relations of the 3 measures of socioeconomic status to risk of disease were assessed using logistic regression analyses. In individual analyses, fewer years of formal schooling, lower income, and lower occupational status each predicted risk of incident AD; risk of disease decreased by approximately 17% for each year of education. In an analysis including all 3 measures, the effect of education on risk for disease remained approximately the same, but the effects of the other 2 measures were somewhat less and did not attain formal statistical significance, compared with separate analysis of each measure. Conclusions: Markers of lower socioeconomic status predict risk of developing incident AD. The mechanism of this relation is uncertain, but the possibility that it reflects unidentified and potentially reversible risk factors for the disease deserves careful investigation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030731549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030731549&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9362989

AN - SCOPUS:0030731549

VL - 54

SP - 1399

EP - 1405

JO - Archives of Neurology

JF - Archives of Neurology

SN - 0003-9942

IS - 11

ER -