“Editing” Genes: A Case Study About How Language Matters in Bioethics

Meaghan O'Keefe, Sarah Perrault, Jodi Halpern, Lisa Ikemoto, Mark A Yarborough, U. C N B C L H S UC North Bioethics Collaboratory for Life & Health Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Metaphors used to describe new technologies mediate public understanding of the innovations. Analyzing the linguistic, rhetorical, and affective aspects of these metaphors opens the range of issues available for bioethical scrutiny and increases public accountability. This article shows how such a multidisciplinary approach can be useful by looking at a set of texts about one issue, the use of a newly developed technique for genetic modification, CRISPRcas9.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-10
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Bioethics
Volume15
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2015

Fingerprint

Bioethics
Metaphor
Bioethical Issues
Language
Genetic Techniques
Social Responsibility
Linguistics
Technology
Gene Editing

Keywords

  • CRISPR
  • genomic
  • germline modification
  • metaphor
  • public engagement
  • rhetoric

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects
  • Health Policy

Cite this

O'Keefe, M., Perrault, S., Halpern, J., Ikemoto, L., Yarborough, M. A., & UC North Bioethics Collaboratory for Life & Health Sciences, U. C. N. B. C. L. H. S. (2015). “Editing” Genes: A Case Study About How Language Matters in Bioethics. American Journal of Bioethics, 15(12), 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2015.1103804

“Editing” Genes : A Case Study About How Language Matters in Bioethics. / O'Keefe, Meaghan; Perrault, Sarah; Halpern, Jodi; Ikemoto, Lisa; Yarborough, Mark A; UC North Bioethics Collaboratory for Life & Health Sciences, U. C N B C L H S.

In: American Journal of Bioethics, Vol. 15, No. 12, 01.12.2015, p. 3-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

O'Keefe, M, Perrault, S, Halpern, J, Ikemoto, L, Yarborough, MA & UC North Bioethics Collaboratory for Life & Health Sciences, UCNBCLHS 2015, '“Editing” Genes: A Case Study About How Language Matters in Bioethics', American Journal of Bioethics, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2015.1103804
O'Keefe M, Perrault S, Halpern J, Ikemoto L, Yarborough MA, UC North Bioethics Collaboratory for Life & Health Sciences UCNBCLHS. “Editing” Genes: A Case Study About How Language Matters in Bioethics. American Journal of Bioethics. 2015 Dec 1;15(12):3-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2015.1103804
O'Keefe, Meaghan ; Perrault, Sarah ; Halpern, Jodi ; Ikemoto, Lisa ; Yarborough, Mark A ; UC North Bioethics Collaboratory for Life & Health Sciences, U. C N B C L H S. / “Editing” Genes : A Case Study About How Language Matters in Bioethics. In: American Journal of Bioethics. 2015 ; Vol. 15, No. 12. pp. 3-10.
@article{434564d3087e4976adb735effe9da81e,
title = "“Editing” Genes: A Case Study About How Language Matters in Bioethics",
abstract = "Metaphors used to describe new technologies mediate public understanding of the innovations. Analyzing the linguistic, rhetorical, and affective aspects of these metaphors opens the range of issues available for bioethical scrutiny and increases public accountability. This article shows how such a multidisciplinary approach can be useful by looking at a set of texts about one issue, the use of a newly developed technique for genetic modification, CRISPRcas9.",
keywords = "CRISPR, genomic, germline modification, metaphor, public engagement, rhetoric",
author = "Meaghan O'Keefe and Sarah Perrault and Jodi Halpern and Lisa Ikemoto and Yarborough, {Mark A} and {UC North Bioethics Collaboratory for Life & Health Sciences}, {U. C N B C L H S}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/15265161.2015.1103804",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "15",
pages = "3--10",
journal = "American Journal of Bioethics",
issn = "1526-5161",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - “Editing” Genes

T2 - A Case Study About How Language Matters in Bioethics

AU - O'Keefe, Meaghan

AU - Perrault, Sarah

AU - Halpern, Jodi

AU - Ikemoto, Lisa

AU - Yarborough, Mark A

AU - UC North Bioethics Collaboratory for Life & Health Sciences, U. C N B C L H S

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Metaphors used to describe new technologies mediate public understanding of the innovations. Analyzing the linguistic, rhetorical, and affective aspects of these metaphors opens the range of issues available for bioethical scrutiny and increases public accountability. This article shows how such a multidisciplinary approach can be useful by looking at a set of texts about one issue, the use of a newly developed technique for genetic modification, CRISPRcas9.

AB - Metaphors used to describe new technologies mediate public understanding of the innovations. Analyzing the linguistic, rhetorical, and affective aspects of these metaphors opens the range of issues available for bioethical scrutiny and increases public accountability. This article shows how such a multidisciplinary approach can be useful by looking at a set of texts about one issue, the use of a newly developed technique for genetic modification, CRISPRcas9.

KW - CRISPR

KW - genomic

KW - germline modification

KW - metaphor

KW - public engagement

KW - rhetoric

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84948960219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84948960219&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15265161.2015.1103804

DO - 10.1080/15265161.2015.1103804

M3 - Article

C2 - 26632354

AN - SCOPUS:84948960219

VL - 15

SP - 3

EP - 10

JO - American Journal of Bioethics

JF - American Journal of Bioethics

SN - 1526-5161

IS - 12

ER -