Economic evaluation of web-based compared with in-person follow-up after total joint arthroplasty

Jacquelyn Marsh, Jeffrey S Hoch, Dianne Bryant, Steven J. MacDonald, Douglas Naudie, Richard McCalden, James Howard, Robert Bourne, James McAuley

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: We previously demonstrated the feasibility and clinical effectiveness of a web-based assessment following total hip or total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of the present study was to conduct an economic evaluation to compare a web-based assessment with in-person follow-up.

Methods: Patients who had undergone total joint arthroplasty at least twelve months previously were randomized to complete a web-based follow-up or visit the clinic for the usual follow-up. We recorded travel costs and time associated with each option. We followed patients for one year after the web-based or in-person follow-up evaluation and documented any resource use related to the joint arthroplasty. We conducted cost analyses from the health-care payer (Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care) and societal perspectives. All costs are presented in 2012 Canadian dollars.

Results: A total of 229 patients (118 in the web-based group, 111 in the usual-care group) completed the study. The mean cost of the assessment from the societal perspective was $98 per patient for the web-based assessment and $162 per patient for the usual method of in-person follow-up. The cost for the web-based assessment was significantly lower from the societal perspective (mean difference, $264; 95% confidence interval [CI], $279 to $248; p < 0.01) and also from the health-care payer perspective (mean difference, $227; 95% CI, $229 to $225; p < 0.01).

Conclusions: The web-based follow-up assessment had a lower cost per patient compared with in-person follow-up from both societal and health-care payer perspectives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1910-1916
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume
Volume96
Issue number22
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 19 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Arthroplasty
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Joints
Costs and Cost Analysis
Delivery of Health Care
Confidence Intervals
Knee Replacement Arthroplasties
Long-Term Care
Ontario
Ambulatory Care
Hip
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Medicine(all)
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Economic evaluation of web-based compared with in-person follow-up after total joint arthroplasty. / Marsh, Jacquelyn; Hoch, Jeffrey S; Bryant, Dianne; MacDonald, Steven J.; Naudie, Douglas; McCalden, Richard; Howard, James; Bourne, Robert; McAuley, James.

In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume, Vol. 96, No. 22, 19.11.2014, p. 1910-1916.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Marsh, J, Hoch, JS, Bryant, D, MacDonald, SJ, Naudie, D, McCalden, R, Howard, J, Bourne, R & McAuley, J 2014, 'Economic evaluation of web-based compared with in-person follow-up after total joint arthroplasty', Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume, vol. 96, no. 22, pp. 1910-1916. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.M.01558
Marsh, Jacquelyn ; Hoch, Jeffrey S ; Bryant, Dianne ; MacDonald, Steven J. ; Naudie, Douglas ; McCalden, Richard ; Howard, James ; Bourne, Robert ; McAuley, James. / Economic evaluation of web-based compared with in-person follow-up after total joint arthroplasty. In: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume. 2014 ; Vol. 96, No. 22. pp. 1910-1916.
@article{6f4d9e11a444434d9294c06ef6803f78,
title = "Economic evaluation of web-based compared with in-person follow-up after total joint arthroplasty",
abstract = "Background: We previously demonstrated the feasibility and clinical effectiveness of a web-based assessment following total hip or total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of the present study was to conduct an economic evaluation to compare a web-based assessment with in-person follow-up.Methods: Patients who had undergone total joint arthroplasty at least twelve months previously were randomized to complete a web-based follow-up or visit the clinic for the usual follow-up. We recorded travel costs and time associated with each option. We followed patients for one year after the web-based or in-person follow-up evaluation and documented any resource use related to the joint arthroplasty. We conducted cost analyses from the health-care payer (Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care) and societal perspectives. All costs are presented in 2012 Canadian dollars.Results: A total of 229 patients (118 in the web-based group, 111 in the usual-care group) completed the study. The mean cost of the assessment from the societal perspective was $98 per patient for the web-based assessment and $162 per patient for the usual method of in-person follow-up. The cost for the web-based assessment was significantly lower from the societal perspective (mean difference, $264; 95{\%} confidence interval [CI], $279 to $248; p < 0.01) and also from the health-care payer perspective (mean difference, $227; 95{\%} CI, $229 to $225; p < 0.01).Conclusions: The web-based follow-up assessment had a lower cost per patient compared with in-person follow-up from both societal and health-care payer perspectives.",
author = "Jacquelyn Marsh and Hoch, {Jeffrey S} and Dianne Bryant and MacDonald, {Steven J.} and Douglas Naudie and Richard McCalden and James Howard and Robert Bourne and James McAuley",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "19",
doi = "10.2106/JBJS.M.01558",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "96",
pages = "1910--1916",
journal = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume",
issn = "0021-9355",
publisher = "Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Inc.",
number = "22",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic evaluation of web-based compared with in-person follow-up after total joint arthroplasty

AU - Marsh, Jacquelyn

AU - Hoch, Jeffrey S

AU - Bryant, Dianne

AU - MacDonald, Steven J.

AU - Naudie, Douglas

AU - McCalden, Richard

AU - Howard, James

AU - Bourne, Robert

AU - McAuley, James

PY - 2014/11/19

Y1 - 2014/11/19

N2 - Background: We previously demonstrated the feasibility and clinical effectiveness of a web-based assessment following total hip or total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of the present study was to conduct an economic evaluation to compare a web-based assessment with in-person follow-up.Methods: Patients who had undergone total joint arthroplasty at least twelve months previously were randomized to complete a web-based follow-up or visit the clinic for the usual follow-up. We recorded travel costs and time associated with each option. We followed patients for one year after the web-based or in-person follow-up evaluation and documented any resource use related to the joint arthroplasty. We conducted cost analyses from the health-care payer (Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care) and societal perspectives. All costs are presented in 2012 Canadian dollars.Results: A total of 229 patients (118 in the web-based group, 111 in the usual-care group) completed the study. The mean cost of the assessment from the societal perspective was $98 per patient for the web-based assessment and $162 per patient for the usual method of in-person follow-up. The cost for the web-based assessment was significantly lower from the societal perspective (mean difference, $264; 95% confidence interval [CI], $279 to $248; p < 0.01) and also from the health-care payer perspective (mean difference, $227; 95% CI, $229 to $225; p < 0.01).Conclusions: The web-based follow-up assessment had a lower cost per patient compared with in-person follow-up from both societal and health-care payer perspectives.

AB - Background: We previously demonstrated the feasibility and clinical effectiveness of a web-based assessment following total hip or total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of the present study was to conduct an economic evaluation to compare a web-based assessment with in-person follow-up.Methods: Patients who had undergone total joint arthroplasty at least twelve months previously were randomized to complete a web-based follow-up or visit the clinic for the usual follow-up. We recorded travel costs and time associated with each option. We followed patients for one year after the web-based or in-person follow-up evaluation and documented any resource use related to the joint arthroplasty. We conducted cost analyses from the health-care payer (Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care) and societal perspectives. All costs are presented in 2012 Canadian dollars.Results: A total of 229 patients (118 in the web-based group, 111 in the usual-care group) completed the study. The mean cost of the assessment from the societal perspective was $98 per patient for the web-based assessment and $162 per patient for the usual method of in-person follow-up. The cost for the web-based assessment was significantly lower from the societal perspective (mean difference, $264; 95% confidence interval [CI], $279 to $248; p < 0.01) and also from the health-care payer perspective (mean difference, $227; 95% CI, $229 to $225; p < 0.01).Conclusions: The web-based follow-up assessment had a lower cost per patient compared with in-person follow-up from both societal and health-care payer perspectives.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84911405873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84911405873&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2106/JBJS.M.01558

DO - 10.2106/JBJS.M.01558

M3 - Article

C2 - 25410510

AN - SCOPUS:84911405873

VL - 96

SP - 1910

EP - 1916

JO - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

JF - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume

SN - 0021-9355

IS - 22

ER -