Economic evaluation of risks to producers who use milk residue testing programs

Barrett Durand Slenning, Ian Gardner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Obiective - To evaluate the decision to test for milk antimicrobial residues in milk from dairy cows treated with procaine penicillin G (PPG). Design-Economic-decision analysis after stochasic simulation. Sample Population - 1,000 computer-simulated cows/model. Procedure - Meta-analysis of the Food Animal Residue Avoidance Databank was used to generate PPG disappearance curves for cows given single PPG treatments IM of 6,600 U/kg (3,000 U/lb) of body weight or 26,400 U/kg (12,000 U/lb), and multiple treatments at 26,400 U/kg (12,000 U/lb), IM. These curves were entered into 1,000-replication stochastic Pharmacokinetic models, generating population-level milk PPG profiles for each treatment group for each day after treatment, which were subjected to economic-decision analyses of feasibility of residue testing. The model was evaluated for changes in herd size, proportion of herd available for testing, milk production test price, test sensitivity/specificity, and withdrawal periods. Results - For both single-treatment groups, a 2-day withdrawal period avoided violative residues. However, nearly two thirds of the cows risked false identification for violative residues. For the multiple-treated group, nearly 40% had violative residues after a 5-day withdrawal period, and an additional 10 to 15% risked false identification for violative residues. Economic analysis yielded a decision against testing mean cost was $2 (ie, 5% more than the mean cost of not testing). Clinical Implications - Complex dynamics of current milk residue tests discourage practitioners from recommending procedures to clients. In general increases in herd size, milk production, proportion of a herd available for testing, or milk price will increase the value of testing. Increasing test sensitivity decreases its desirability to producers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)419-427
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Veterinary Medical Association
Volume211
Issue number4
StatePublished - Aug 15 1997

Fingerprint

economic analysis
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Penicillin G Procaine
Milk
milk
procaine
benzylpenicillin
testing
Decision Support Techniques
Economics
herd size
cows
Costs and Cost Analysis
milk production
herds
milk prices
Population
milk analysis
economics
Meta-Analysis

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Economic evaluation of risks to producers who use milk residue testing programs. / Slenning, Barrett Durand; Gardner, Ian.

In: Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, Vol. 211, No. 4, 15.08.1997, p. 419-427.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fc3e91940fef4484b561f6ebf8418ba4,
title = "Economic evaluation of risks to producers who use milk residue testing programs",
abstract = "Obiective - To evaluate the decision to test for milk antimicrobial residues in milk from dairy cows treated with procaine penicillin G (PPG). Design-Economic-decision analysis after stochasic simulation. Sample Population - 1,000 computer-simulated cows/model. Procedure - Meta-analysis of the Food Animal Residue Avoidance Databank was used to generate PPG disappearance curves for cows given single PPG treatments IM of 6,600 U/kg (3,000 U/lb) of body weight or 26,400 U/kg (12,000 U/lb), and multiple treatments at 26,400 U/kg (12,000 U/lb), IM. These curves were entered into 1,000-replication stochastic Pharmacokinetic models, generating population-level milk PPG profiles for each treatment group for each day after treatment, which were subjected to economic-decision analyses of feasibility of residue testing. The model was evaluated for changes in herd size, proportion of herd available for testing, milk production test price, test sensitivity/specificity, and withdrawal periods. Results - For both single-treatment groups, a 2-day withdrawal period avoided violative residues. However, nearly two thirds of the cows risked false identification for violative residues. For the multiple-treated group, nearly 40{\%} had violative residues after a 5-day withdrawal period, and an additional 10 to 15{\%} risked false identification for violative residues. Economic analysis yielded a decision against testing mean cost was $2 (ie, 5{\%} more than the mean cost of not testing). Clinical Implications - Complex dynamics of current milk residue tests discourage practitioners from recommending procedures to clients. In general increases in herd size, milk production, proportion of a herd available for testing, or milk price will increase the value of testing. Increasing test sensitivity decreases its desirability to producers.",
author = "Slenning, {Barrett Durand} and Ian Gardner",
year = "1997",
month = "8",
day = "15",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "211",
pages = "419--427",
journal = "Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association",
issn = "0003-1488",
publisher = "American Veterinary Medical Association",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Economic evaluation of risks to producers who use milk residue testing programs

AU - Slenning, Barrett Durand

AU - Gardner, Ian

PY - 1997/8/15

Y1 - 1997/8/15

N2 - Obiective - To evaluate the decision to test for milk antimicrobial residues in milk from dairy cows treated with procaine penicillin G (PPG). Design-Economic-decision analysis after stochasic simulation. Sample Population - 1,000 computer-simulated cows/model. Procedure - Meta-analysis of the Food Animal Residue Avoidance Databank was used to generate PPG disappearance curves for cows given single PPG treatments IM of 6,600 U/kg (3,000 U/lb) of body weight or 26,400 U/kg (12,000 U/lb), and multiple treatments at 26,400 U/kg (12,000 U/lb), IM. These curves were entered into 1,000-replication stochastic Pharmacokinetic models, generating population-level milk PPG profiles for each treatment group for each day after treatment, which were subjected to economic-decision analyses of feasibility of residue testing. The model was evaluated for changes in herd size, proportion of herd available for testing, milk production test price, test sensitivity/specificity, and withdrawal periods. Results - For both single-treatment groups, a 2-day withdrawal period avoided violative residues. However, nearly two thirds of the cows risked false identification for violative residues. For the multiple-treated group, nearly 40% had violative residues after a 5-day withdrawal period, and an additional 10 to 15% risked false identification for violative residues. Economic analysis yielded a decision against testing mean cost was $2 (ie, 5% more than the mean cost of not testing). Clinical Implications - Complex dynamics of current milk residue tests discourage practitioners from recommending procedures to clients. In general increases in herd size, milk production, proportion of a herd available for testing, or milk price will increase the value of testing. Increasing test sensitivity decreases its desirability to producers.

AB - Obiective - To evaluate the decision to test for milk antimicrobial residues in milk from dairy cows treated with procaine penicillin G (PPG). Design-Economic-decision analysis after stochasic simulation. Sample Population - 1,000 computer-simulated cows/model. Procedure - Meta-analysis of the Food Animal Residue Avoidance Databank was used to generate PPG disappearance curves for cows given single PPG treatments IM of 6,600 U/kg (3,000 U/lb) of body weight or 26,400 U/kg (12,000 U/lb), and multiple treatments at 26,400 U/kg (12,000 U/lb), IM. These curves were entered into 1,000-replication stochastic Pharmacokinetic models, generating population-level milk PPG profiles for each treatment group for each day after treatment, which were subjected to economic-decision analyses of feasibility of residue testing. The model was evaluated for changes in herd size, proportion of herd available for testing, milk production test price, test sensitivity/specificity, and withdrawal periods. Results - For both single-treatment groups, a 2-day withdrawal period avoided violative residues. However, nearly two thirds of the cows risked false identification for violative residues. For the multiple-treated group, nearly 40% had violative residues after a 5-day withdrawal period, and an additional 10 to 15% risked false identification for violative residues. Economic analysis yielded a decision against testing mean cost was $2 (ie, 5% more than the mean cost of not testing). Clinical Implications - Complex dynamics of current milk residue tests discourage practitioners from recommending procedures to clients. In general increases in herd size, milk production, proportion of a herd available for testing, or milk price will increase the value of testing. Increasing test sensitivity decreases its desirability to producers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031571239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031571239&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 9267502

AN - SCOPUS:0031571239

VL - 211

SP - 419

EP - 427

JO - Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

JF - Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association

SN - 0003-1488

IS - 4

ER -