Dynamic changes of the pelvis and spine are key to predicting postoperative sagittal alignment after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: A critical analysis of preoperative planning techniques

Justin S. Smith, Shay Bess, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Douglas C. Burton, Robert A. Hart, Richard Hostin, Eric Otto Klineberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective, radiographical analysis of mathe-matical formulas used to predict sagittal vertical axis (SVA) after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). OBJECTIVE.: Evaluate the ability of different formulas to predict SVA after PSO. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Failure to achieve optimal spinal alignment after spinal fusion correlates with poor outcomes. Numerous mathematical models have been proposed to aid preoperative PSO planning and predict postoperative SVA. Pelvic parameters have been shown to impact spinal alignment; however, many preoperative planning models fail to evaluate these. Compensatory changes within unfused spinal segments have also been shown to impact SVA. Predictive formulas that do not evaluate pelvic parameters and unfused spinal segments may erroneously guide PSO surgery. A formula that integrates pelvic tilt (PT) and spinal compensatory changes to predict optimal SVA has been previously proposed. METHODS.: Comparative analysis of 5 mathematical models used to predict optimal postoperative SVA (<5 cm) after PSO was performed using a multicenter PSO database. RESULTS.: Radiographs of 147 patients, mean age 52 years (SD = 15 yr), who received 147 PSOs (42 thoracic and 105 lumbar) were evaluated. Mean preoperative and postoperative SVA was 108 mm (SD = 95 mm) and 30 mm (SD = 60 mm; P < 0.001), respectively. Each mathematical formula provided unique prediction for postoperative SA (Pearson R < 0.15). Formulas that neglected pelvic alignment poorly predicted final SVA and poorly correlated with optimal SVA. Formulas that evaluated pelvic morphology (pelvic incidence) had improved SVA prediction. The Lafage formulas, which incorporate PT and spinal compensatory changes, had the best SVA prediction (P < 0.05) and best correlation with optimal SVA (R = 0.75). CONCLUSION.: Preoperative planning for PSO is essential to optimize postoperative spinal alignment. Mathematical models that do not consider pelvic parameters and changes in unfused spinal segments poorly predict optimal postoperative alignment and may predispose to poor clinical outcomes. The Lafage formulas, which incorporated PT and spinal compensatory changes, best predicted optimal SVA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)845-853
Number of pages9
JournalSpine
Volume37
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2012

Fingerprint

Planning Techniques
Osteotomy
Pelvis
Spine
Theoretical Models
Spinal Fusion
Thorax
Databases
Incidence

Keywords

  • osteotomy
  • pedicle subtraction osteotomy
  • prediction formula
  • sagittal vertical axis
  • spinopelvic alignment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Cite this

Dynamic changes of the pelvis and spine are key to predicting postoperative sagittal alignment after pedicle subtraction osteotomy : A critical analysis of preoperative planning techniques. / Smith, Justin S.; Bess, Shay; Shaffrey, Christopher I.; Burton, Douglas C.; Hart, Robert A.; Hostin, Richard; Klineberg, Eric Otto.

In: Spine, Vol. 37, No. 10, 01.05.2012, p. 845-853.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Smith, Justin S. ; Bess, Shay ; Shaffrey, Christopher I. ; Burton, Douglas C. ; Hart, Robert A. ; Hostin, Richard ; Klineberg, Eric Otto. / Dynamic changes of the pelvis and spine are key to predicting postoperative sagittal alignment after pedicle subtraction osteotomy : A critical analysis of preoperative planning techniques. In: Spine. 2012 ; Vol. 37, No. 10. pp. 845-853.
@article{3edd05bfdc07474e908bf0a62fa76888,
title = "Dynamic changes of the pelvis and spine are key to predicting postoperative sagittal alignment after pedicle subtraction osteotomy: A critical analysis of preoperative planning techniques",
abstract = "STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective, radiographical analysis of mathe-matical formulas used to predict sagittal vertical axis (SVA) after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). OBJECTIVE.: Evaluate the ability of different formulas to predict SVA after PSO. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Failure to achieve optimal spinal alignment after spinal fusion correlates with poor outcomes. Numerous mathematical models have been proposed to aid preoperative PSO planning and predict postoperative SVA. Pelvic parameters have been shown to impact spinal alignment; however, many preoperative planning models fail to evaluate these. Compensatory changes within unfused spinal segments have also been shown to impact SVA. Predictive formulas that do not evaluate pelvic parameters and unfused spinal segments may erroneously guide PSO surgery. A formula that integrates pelvic tilt (PT) and spinal compensatory changes to predict optimal SVA has been previously proposed. METHODS.: Comparative analysis of 5 mathematical models used to predict optimal postoperative SVA (<5 cm) after PSO was performed using a multicenter PSO database. RESULTS.: Radiographs of 147 patients, mean age 52 years (SD = 15 yr), who received 147 PSOs (42 thoracic and 105 lumbar) were evaluated. Mean preoperative and postoperative SVA was 108 mm (SD = 95 mm) and 30 mm (SD = 60 mm; P < 0.001), respectively. Each mathematical formula provided unique prediction for postoperative SA (Pearson R < 0.15). Formulas that neglected pelvic alignment poorly predicted final SVA and poorly correlated with optimal SVA. Formulas that evaluated pelvic morphology (pelvic incidence) had improved SVA prediction. The Lafage formulas, which incorporate PT and spinal compensatory changes, had the best SVA prediction (P < 0.05) and best correlation with optimal SVA (R = 0.75). CONCLUSION.: Preoperative planning for PSO is essential to optimize postoperative spinal alignment. Mathematical models that do not consider pelvic parameters and changes in unfused spinal segments poorly predict optimal postoperative alignment and may predispose to poor clinical outcomes. The Lafage formulas, which incorporated PT and spinal compensatory changes, best predicted optimal SVA.",
keywords = "osteotomy, pedicle subtraction osteotomy, prediction formula, sagittal vertical axis, spinopelvic alignment",
author = "Smith, {Justin S.} and Shay Bess and Shaffrey, {Christopher I.} and Burton, {Douglas C.} and Hart, {Robert A.} and Richard Hostin and Klineberg, {Eric Otto}",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823b0892",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "845--853",
journal = "Spine",
issn = "0362-2436",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Dynamic changes of the pelvis and spine are key to predicting postoperative sagittal alignment after pedicle subtraction osteotomy

T2 - A critical analysis of preoperative planning techniques

AU - Smith, Justin S.

AU - Bess, Shay

AU - Shaffrey, Christopher I.

AU - Burton, Douglas C.

AU - Hart, Robert A.

AU - Hostin, Richard

AU - Klineberg, Eric Otto

PY - 2012/5/1

Y1 - 2012/5/1

N2 - STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective, radiographical analysis of mathe-matical formulas used to predict sagittal vertical axis (SVA) after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). OBJECTIVE.: Evaluate the ability of different formulas to predict SVA after PSO. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Failure to achieve optimal spinal alignment after spinal fusion correlates with poor outcomes. Numerous mathematical models have been proposed to aid preoperative PSO planning and predict postoperative SVA. Pelvic parameters have been shown to impact spinal alignment; however, many preoperative planning models fail to evaluate these. Compensatory changes within unfused spinal segments have also been shown to impact SVA. Predictive formulas that do not evaluate pelvic parameters and unfused spinal segments may erroneously guide PSO surgery. A formula that integrates pelvic tilt (PT) and spinal compensatory changes to predict optimal SVA has been previously proposed. METHODS.: Comparative analysis of 5 mathematical models used to predict optimal postoperative SVA (<5 cm) after PSO was performed using a multicenter PSO database. RESULTS.: Radiographs of 147 patients, mean age 52 years (SD = 15 yr), who received 147 PSOs (42 thoracic and 105 lumbar) were evaluated. Mean preoperative and postoperative SVA was 108 mm (SD = 95 mm) and 30 mm (SD = 60 mm; P < 0.001), respectively. Each mathematical formula provided unique prediction for postoperative SA (Pearson R < 0.15). Formulas that neglected pelvic alignment poorly predicted final SVA and poorly correlated with optimal SVA. Formulas that evaluated pelvic morphology (pelvic incidence) had improved SVA prediction. The Lafage formulas, which incorporate PT and spinal compensatory changes, had the best SVA prediction (P < 0.05) and best correlation with optimal SVA (R = 0.75). CONCLUSION.: Preoperative planning for PSO is essential to optimize postoperative spinal alignment. Mathematical models that do not consider pelvic parameters and changes in unfused spinal segments poorly predict optimal postoperative alignment and may predispose to poor clinical outcomes. The Lafage formulas, which incorporated PT and spinal compensatory changes, best predicted optimal SVA.

AB - STUDY DESIGN.: Retrospective, radiographical analysis of mathe-matical formulas used to predict sagittal vertical axis (SVA) after pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). OBJECTIVE.: Evaluate the ability of different formulas to predict SVA after PSO. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA.: Failure to achieve optimal spinal alignment after spinal fusion correlates with poor outcomes. Numerous mathematical models have been proposed to aid preoperative PSO planning and predict postoperative SVA. Pelvic parameters have been shown to impact spinal alignment; however, many preoperative planning models fail to evaluate these. Compensatory changes within unfused spinal segments have also been shown to impact SVA. Predictive formulas that do not evaluate pelvic parameters and unfused spinal segments may erroneously guide PSO surgery. A formula that integrates pelvic tilt (PT) and spinal compensatory changes to predict optimal SVA has been previously proposed. METHODS.: Comparative analysis of 5 mathematical models used to predict optimal postoperative SVA (<5 cm) after PSO was performed using a multicenter PSO database. RESULTS.: Radiographs of 147 patients, mean age 52 years (SD = 15 yr), who received 147 PSOs (42 thoracic and 105 lumbar) were evaluated. Mean preoperative and postoperative SVA was 108 mm (SD = 95 mm) and 30 mm (SD = 60 mm; P < 0.001), respectively. Each mathematical formula provided unique prediction for postoperative SA (Pearson R < 0.15). Formulas that neglected pelvic alignment poorly predicted final SVA and poorly correlated with optimal SVA. Formulas that evaluated pelvic morphology (pelvic incidence) had improved SVA prediction. The Lafage formulas, which incorporate PT and spinal compensatory changes, had the best SVA prediction (P < 0.05) and best correlation with optimal SVA (R = 0.75). CONCLUSION.: Preoperative planning for PSO is essential to optimize postoperative spinal alignment. Mathematical models that do not consider pelvic parameters and changes in unfused spinal segments poorly predict optimal postoperative alignment and may predispose to poor clinical outcomes. The Lafage formulas, which incorporated PT and spinal compensatory changes, best predicted optimal SVA.

KW - osteotomy

KW - pedicle subtraction osteotomy

KW - prediction formula

KW - sagittal vertical axis

KW - spinopelvic alignment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860833397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860833397&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823b0892

DO - 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823b0892

M3 - Article

C2 - 22024904

AN - SCOPUS:84860833397

VL - 37

SP - 845

EP - 853

JO - Spine

JF - Spine

SN - 0362-2436

IS - 10

ER -