Does size matter to models? Exploring the effect of herd size on outputs of a herd-level disease spread simulator

Mary Van Andel, Tracey Hollings, Richard Bradhurst, Andrew Robinson, Mark Burgman, M. Carolyn Gates, Paul Bingham, Tim Carpenter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Disease spread modeling is widely used by veterinary authorities to predict the impact of emergency animal disease outbreaks in livestock and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different management interventions. Such models require knowledge of basic disease epidemiology as well as information about the population of animals at risk. Essential demographic information includes the production system, animal numbers, and their spatial locations yet many countries with significant livestock industries do not have publically available and accurate animal population information at the farm level that can be used in these models. The impact of inaccuracies in data on model outputs and the decisions based on these outputs is seldom discussed. In this analysis, we used the Australian Animal Disease model to simulate the spread of foot-and-mouth disease seeded into high-risk herds in six different farming regions in New Zealand. We used three different susceptible animal population datasets: (1) a gold standard dataset comprising known herd sizes, (2) a dataset where herd size was simulated from a beta-pert distribution for each herd production type, and (3) a dataset where herd size was simplified to the median herd size for each herd production type. We analyzed the model outputs to compare (i) the extent of disease spread, (ii) the length of the outbreaks, and (iii) the possible impacts on decisions made for simulated outbreaks in different regions. Model outputs using the different datasets showed statistically significant differences, which could have serious implications for decision making by a competent authority. Outbreak duration, number of infected properties, and vaccine doses used during the outbreak were all significantly smaller for the gold standard dataset when compared with the median herd size dataset. Initial outbreak location and disease control strategy also significantly influenced the duration of the outbreak and number of infected premises. The study findings demonstrate the importance of having accurate national-level population datasets to ensure effective decisions are made before and during disease outbreaks, reducing the damage and cost.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number78
JournalFrontiers in Veterinary Science
Volume5
Issue numberMAY
DOIs
StatePublished - May 4 2018
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

herd size
Disease Outbreaks
herds
gold
animals
Livestock
animal disease models
duration
livestock and meat industry
foot-and-mouth disease
animal diseases
cost effectiveness
Population
Foot-and-Mouth Disease
Animal Disease Models
Animal Diseases
Datasets
epidemiology
decision making
disease control

Keywords

  • Animal populations
  • Biosecurity preparedness
  • Disease spread modeling
  • Outbreak response
  • Quantitative epidemiology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

Does size matter to models? Exploring the effect of herd size on outputs of a herd-level disease spread simulator. / Van Andel, Mary; Hollings, Tracey; Bradhurst, Richard; Robinson, Andrew; Burgman, Mark; Gates, M. Carolyn; Bingham, Paul; Carpenter, Tim.

In: Frontiers in Veterinary Science, Vol. 5, No. MAY, 78, 04.05.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Van Andel, Mary ; Hollings, Tracey ; Bradhurst, Richard ; Robinson, Andrew ; Burgman, Mark ; Gates, M. Carolyn ; Bingham, Paul ; Carpenter, Tim. / Does size matter to models? Exploring the effect of herd size on outputs of a herd-level disease spread simulator. In: Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 2018 ; Vol. 5, No. MAY.
@article{6ac9856592a34bea8949c1eb485a53c2,
title = "Does size matter to models? Exploring the effect of herd size on outputs of a herd-level disease spread simulator",
abstract = "Disease spread modeling is widely used by veterinary authorities to predict the impact of emergency animal disease outbreaks in livestock and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different management interventions. Such models require knowledge of basic disease epidemiology as well as information about the population of animals at risk. Essential demographic information includes the production system, animal numbers, and their spatial locations yet many countries with significant livestock industries do not have publically available and accurate animal population information at the farm level that can be used in these models. The impact of inaccuracies in data on model outputs and the decisions based on these outputs is seldom discussed. In this analysis, we used the Australian Animal Disease model to simulate the spread of foot-and-mouth disease seeded into high-risk herds in six different farming regions in New Zealand. We used three different susceptible animal population datasets: (1) a gold standard dataset comprising known herd sizes, (2) a dataset where herd size was simulated from a beta-pert distribution for each herd production type, and (3) a dataset where herd size was simplified to the median herd size for each herd production type. We analyzed the model outputs to compare (i) the extent of disease spread, (ii) the length of the outbreaks, and (iii) the possible impacts on decisions made for simulated outbreaks in different regions. Model outputs using the different datasets showed statistically significant differences, which could have serious implications for decision making by a competent authority. Outbreak duration, number of infected properties, and vaccine doses used during the outbreak were all significantly smaller for the gold standard dataset when compared with the median herd size dataset. Initial outbreak location and disease control strategy also significantly influenced the duration of the outbreak and number of infected premises. The study findings demonstrate the importance of having accurate national-level population datasets to ensure effective decisions are made before and during disease outbreaks, reducing the damage and cost.",
keywords = "Animal populations, Biosecurity preparedness, Disease spread modeling, Outbreak response, Quantitative epidemiology",
author = "{Van Andel}, Mary and Tracey Hollings and Richard Bradhurst and Andrew Robinson and Mark Burgman and Gates, {M. Carolyn} and Paul Bingham and Tim Carpenter",
year = "2018",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.3389/fvets.2018.00078",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
journal = "Frontiers in Veterinary Science",
issn = "2297-1769",
publisher = "Frontiers Media S. A.",
number = "MAY",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Does size matter to models? Exploring the effect of herd size on outputs of a herd-level disease spread simulator

AU - Van Andel, Mary

AU - Hollings, Tracey

AU - Bradhurst, Richard

AU - Robinson, Andrew

AU - Burgman, Mark

AU - Gates, M. Carolyn

AU - Bingham, Paul

AU - Carpenter, Tim

PY - 2018/5/4

Y1 - 2018/5/4

N2 - Disease spread modeling is widely used by veterinary authorities to predict the impact of emergency animal disease outbreaks in livestock and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different management interventions. Such models require knowledge of basic disease epidemiology as well as information about the population of animals at risk. Essential demographic information includes the production system, animal numbers, and their spatial locations yet many countries with significant livestock industries do not have publically available and accurate animal population information at the farm level that can be used in these models. The impact of inaccuracies in data on model outputs and the decisions based on these outputs is seldom discussed. In this analysis, we used the Australian Animal Disease model to simulate the spread of foot-and-mouth disease seeded into high-risk herds in six different farming regions in New Zealand. We used three different susceptible animal population datasets: (1) a gold standard dataset comprising known herd sizes, (2) a dataset where herd size was simulated from a beta-pert distribution for each herd production type, and (3) a dataset where herd size was simplified to the median herd size for each herd production type. We analyzed the model outputs to compare (i) the extent of disease spread, (ii) the length of the outbreaks, and (iii) the possible impacts on decisions made for simulated outbreaks in different regions. Model outputs using the different datasets showed statistically significant differences, which could have serious implications for decision making by a competent authority. Outbreak duration, number of infected properties, and vaccine doses used during the outbreak were all significantly smaller for the gold standard dataset when compared with the median herd size dataset. Initial outbreak location and disease control strategy also significantly influenced the duration of the outbreak and number of infected premises. The study findings demonstrate the importance of having accurate national-level population datasets to ensure effective decisions are made before and during disease outbreaks, reducing the damage and cost.

AB - Disease spread modeling is widely used by veterinary authorities to predict the impact of emergency animal disease outbreaks in livestock and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different management interventions. Such models require knowledge of basic disease epidemiology as well as information about the population of animals at risk. Essential demographic information includes the production system, animal numbers, and their spatial locations yet many countries with significant livestock industries do not have publically available and accurate animal population information at the farm level that can be used in these models. The impact of inaccuracies in data on model outputs and the decisions based on these outputs is seldom discussed. In this analysis, we used the Australian Animal Disease model to simulate the spread of foot-and-mouth disease seeded into high-risk herds in six different farming regions in New Zealand. We used three different susceptible animal population datasets: (1) a gold standard dataset comprising known herd sizes, (2) a dataset where herd size was simulated from a beta-pert distribution for each herd production type, and (3) a dataset where herd size was simplified to the median herd size for each herd production type. We analyzed the model outputs to compare (i) the extent of disease spread, (ii) the length of the outbreaks, and (iii) the possible impacts on decisions made for simulated outbreaks in different regions. Model outputs using the different datasets showed statistically significant differences, which could have serious implications for decision making by a competent authority. Outbreak duration, number of infected properties, and vaccine doses used during the outbreak were all significantly smaller for the gold standard dataset when compared with the median herd size dataset. Initial outbreak location and disease control strategy also significantly influenced the duration of the outbreak and number of infected premises. The study findings demonstrate the importance of having accurate national-level population datasets to ensure effective decisions are made before and during disease outbreaks, reducing the damage and cost.

KW - Animal populations

KW - Biosecurity preparedness

KW - Disease spread modeling

KW - Outbreak response

KW - Quantitative epidemiology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85046854573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85046854573&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fvets.2018.00078

DO - 10.3389/fvets.2018.00078

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85046854573

VL - 5

JO - Frontiers in Veterinary Science

JF - Frontiers in Veterinary Science

SN - 2297-1769

IS - MAY

M1 - 78

ER -