Do we continue to unnecessarily perform ipsilateral adrenalectomy at the time of radical nephrectomy? A population based study

Stanley Yap, Shabbir M. Alibhai, Robert Abouassaly, Narhari Timilshina, Antonio Finelli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Since the mid 1990s evidence has supported ipsilateral adrenal gland sparing radical nephrectomy unless the gland appears involved on imaging or the primary tumor is large and located in the upper pole. However, it is unclear whether this shift in surgical practice has been adopted at the population level. Using the Ontario Cancer Registry we identified 5,135 patients in the province of Ontario who underwent radical nephrectomy between 1995 and 2004. Ipsilateral adrenalectomy and tumor involvement of the adrenal gland were ascertained from pathology reports. Further variables analyzed included age, gender, pathology, surgeon year of graduation, academic status of hospital/surgeon, hospital and surgeon volume, and year of surgery. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess outcomes. The overall rate of adrenal gland involvement with cancer was 1.4%. The adrenal was involved in 3.2% of tumors larger than 7 cm vs only 0.89% of tumors 4 to 7 cm and 0.63% of tumors smaller than 4 cm. Factors predictive of adrenal involvement on multivariable analysis were tumor size greater than 7 cm and fat invasion. The overall adrenalectomy rate was 40.1%, which decreased slightly over time (40.6% in 1995 vs 34.8% in 2004). Variables predictive of adrenal removal on multivariable analysis included tumor size greater than 7 cm, presence of venous thrombus, upper pole location, higher hospital volume, and academic status of hospital or surgeon. Despite evidence to support preservation of the ipsilateral adrenal gland during radical nephrectomy, the rate of adrenalectomy decreased only slightly in 10 years. Adrenalectomy remains overused in populations that are unlikely to benefit from the procedure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)398-404
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume187
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Adrenalectomy
Nephrectomy
Adrenal Glands
Population
Neoplasms
Ontario
High-Volume Hospitals
Pathology
Registries
Thrombosis
Logistic Models
Fats
Surgeons

Keywords

  • adrenal glands
  • adrenal insufficiency
  • kidney neoplasms
  • nephrectomy

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Do we continue to unnecessarily perform ipsilateral adrenalectomy at the time of radical nephrectomy? A population based study. / Yap, Stanley; Alibhai, Shabbir M.; Abouassaly, Robert; Timilshina, Narhari; Finelli, Antonio.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 187, No. 2, 02.2012, p. 398-404.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Yap, Stanley ; Alibhai, Shabbir M. ; Abouassaly, Robert ; Timilshina, Narhari ; Finelli, Antonio. / Do we continue to unnecessarily perform ipsilateral adrenalectomy at the time of radical nephrectomy? A population based study. In: Journal of Urology. 2012 ; Vol. 187, No. 2. pp. 398-404.
@article{2062f795ecad4e269d1975a96f3069b8,
title = "Do we continue to unnecessarily perform ipsilateral adrenalectomy at the time of radical nephrectomy? A population based study",
abstract = "Since the mid 1990s evidence has supported ipsilateral adrenal gland sparing radical nephrectomy unless the gland appears involved on imaging or the primary tumor is large and located in the upper pole. However, it is unclear whether this shift in surgical practice has been adopted at the population level. Using the Ontario Cancer Registry we identified 5,135 patients in the province of Ontario who underwent radical nephrectomy between 1995 and 2004. Ipsilateral adrenalectomy and tumor involvement of the adrenal gland were ascertained from pathology reports. Further variables analyzed included age, gender, pathology, surgeon year of graduation, academic status of hospital/surgeon, hospital and surgeon volume, and year of surgery. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess outcomes. The overall rate of adrenal gland involvement with cancer was 1.4{\%}. The adrenal was involved in 3.2{\%} of tumors larger than 7 cm vs only 0.89{\%} of tumors 4 to 7 cm and 0.63{\%} of tumors smaller than 4 cm. Factors predictive of adrenal involvement on multivariable analysis were tumor size greater than 7 cm and fat invasion. The overall adrenalectomy rate was 40.1{\%}, which decreased slightly over time (40.6{\%} in 1995 vs 34.8{\%} in 2004). Variables predictive of adrenal removal on multivariable analysis included tumor size greater than 7 cm, presence of venous thrombus, upper pole location, higher hospital volume, and academic status of hospital or surgeon. Despite evidence to support preservation of the ipsilateral adrenal gland during radical nephrectomy, the rate of adrenalectomy decreased only slightly in 10 years. Adrenalectomy remains overused in populations that are unlikely to benefit from the procedure.",
keywords = "adrenal glands, adrenal insufficiency, kidney neoplasms, nephrectomy",
author = "Stanley Yap and Alibhai, {Shabbir M.} and Robert Abouassaly and Narhari Timilshina and Antonio Finelli",
year = "2012",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.030",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "187",
pages = "398--404",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do we continue to unnecessarily perform ipsilateral adrenalectomy at the time of radical nephrectomy? A population based study

AU - Yap, Stanley

AU - Alibhai, Shabbir M.

AU - Abouassaly, Robert

AU - Timilshina, Narhari

AU - Finelli, Antonio

PY - 2012/2

Y1 - 2012/2

N2 - Since the mid 1990s evidence has supported ipsilateral adrenal gland sparing radical nephrectomy unless the gland appears involved on imaging or the primary tumor is large and located in the upper pole. However, it is unclear whether this shift in surgical practice has been adopted at the population level. Using the Ontario Cancer Registry we identified 5,135 patients in the province of Ontario who underwent radical nephrectomy between 1995 and 2004. Ipsilateral adrenalectomy and tumor involvement of the adrenal gland were ascertained from pathology reports. Further variables analyzed included age, gender, pathology, surgeon year of graduation, academic status of hospital/surgeon, hospital and surgeon volume, and year of surgery. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess outcomes. The overall rate of adrenal gland involvement with cancer was 1.4%. The adrenal was involved in 3.2% of tumors larger than 7 cm vs only 0.89% of tumors 4 to 7 cm and 0.63% of tumors smaller than 4 cm. Factors predictive of adrenal involvement on multivariable analysis were tumor size greater than 7 cm and fat invasion. The overall adrenalectomy rate was 40.1%, which decreased slightly over time (40.6% in 1995 vs 34.8% in 2004). Variables predictive of adrenal removal on multivariable analysis included tumor size greater than 7 cm, presence of venous thrombus, upper pole location, higher hospital volume, and academic status of hospital or surgeon. Despite evidence to support preservation of the ipsilateral adrenal gland during radical nephrectomy, the rate of adrenalectomy decreased only slightly in 10 years. Adrenalectomy remains overused in populations that are unlikely to benefit from the procedure.

AB - Since the mid 1990s evidence has supported ipsilateral adrenal gland sparing radical nephrectomy unless the gland appears involved on imaging or the primary tumor is large and located in the upper pole. However, it is unclear whether this shift in surgical practice has been adopted at the population level. Using the Ontario Cancer Registry we identified 5,135 patients in the province of Ontario who underwent radical nephrectomy between 1995 and 2004. Ipsilateral adrenalectomy and tumor involvement of the adrenal gland were ascertained from pathology reports. Further variables analyzed included age, gender, pathology, surgeon year of graduation, academic status of hospital/surgeon, hospital and surgeon volume, and year of surgery. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess outcomes. The overall rate of adrenal gland involvement with cancer was 1.4%. The adrenal was involved in 3.2% of tumors larger than 7 cm vs only 0.89% of tumors 4 to 7 cm and 0.63% of tumors smaller than 4 cm. Factors predictive of adrenal involvement on multivariable analysis were tumor size greater than 7 cm and fat invasion. The overall adrenalectomy rate was 40.1%, which decreased slightly over time (40.6% in 1995 vs 34.8% in 2004). Variables predictive of adrenal removal on multivariable analysis included tumor size greater than 7 cm, presence of venous thrombus, upper pole location, higher hospital volume, and academic status of hospital or surgeon. Despite evidence to support preservation of the ipsilateral adrenal gland during radical nephrectomy, the rate of adrenalectomy decreased only slightly in 10 years. Adrenalectomy remains overused in populations that are unlikely to benefit from the procedure.

KW - adrenal glands

KW - adrenal insufficiency

KW - kidney neoplasms

KW - nephrectomy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84855606329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84855606329&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.030

DO - 10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.030

M3 - Article

C2 - 22177155

AN - SCOPUS:84855606329

VL - 187

SP - 398

EP - 404

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 2

ER -