Do trauma centers have the capacity to respond to disasters?

Frederick P. Rivara, Avery B. Nathens, Gregory Jurkovich, Ronald V. Maier

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concern has been raised about the capacity of trauma centers to absorb large numbers of additional patients from mass casualty events. Our objective was to examine the capacity of current centers to handle an increased load from a mass casualty disaster. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of Level I and II trauma centers. They were contacted by mail and asked to respond to questions about their surge capacity as of July 4, 2005. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 133 centers. On July 4, 2005 there were a median of 77 beds available in Level I and 84 in Level II trauma centers. Fifteen percent of the Level I and 12.2% of the Level II centers had a census at 95% capacity or greater. In the first 6 hours, each Level I center would be able to operate on 38 patients, while each Level II center would be able to operate on 22 patients. Based on available data, there are 10 trauma centers available to an average American within 60 minutes. Given the available bed capacity, a total of 812 beds would be available within a 60-minute transport distance in a mass casualty event. CONCLUSIONS: There is capacity to care for the number of serious non-fatally injured patients resulting from the types of mass casualties recently experienced. If there is a further continued shift of uninsured patients to and fiscally driven closure of trauma centers, the surge capacity could be severely compromised.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)949-953
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume61
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2006
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Trauma Centers
Mass Casualty Incidents
Disasters
Surge Capacity
Postal Service
Censuses
Cross-Sectional Studies

Keywords

  • Capacity
  • Disaster
  • Terrorism
  • Trauma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Do trauma centers have the capacity to respond to disasters? / Rivara, Frederick P.; Nathens, Avery B.; Jurkovich, Gregory; Maier, Ronald V.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 61, No. 4, 01.10.2006, p. 949-953.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rivara, Frederick P. ; Nathens, Avery B. ; Jurkovich, Gregory ; Maier, Ronald V. / Do trauma centers have the capacity to respond to disasters?. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2006 ; Vol. 61, No. 4. pp. 949-953.
@article{5b3f622c615b44f5a14441a6aaf152c0,
title = "Do trauma centers have the capacity to respond to disasters?",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Concern has been raised about the capacity of trauma centers to absorb large numbers of additional patients from mass casualty events. Our objective was to examine the capacity of current centers to handle an increased load from a mass casualty disaster. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of Level I and II trauma centers. They were contacted by mail and asked to respond to questions about their surge capacity as of July 4, 2005. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 133 centers. On July 4, 2005 there were a median of 77 beds available in Level I and 84 in Level II trauma centers. Fifteen percent of the Level I and 12.2{\%} of the Level II centers had a census at 95{\%} capacity or greater. In the first 6 hours, each Level I center would be able to operate on 38 patients, while each Level II center would be able to operate on 22 patients. Based on available data, there are 10 trauma centers available to an average American within 60 minutes. Given the available bed capacity, a total of 812 beds would be available within a 60-minute transport distance in a mass casualty event. CONCLUSIONS: There is capacity to care for the number of serious non-fatally injured patients resulting from the types of mass casualties recently experienced. If there is a further continued shift of uninsured patients to and fiscally driven closure of trauma centers, the surge capacity could be severely compromised.",
keywords = "Capacity, Disaster, Terrorism, Trauma",
author = "Rivara, {Frederick P.} and Nathens, {Avery B.} and Gregory Jurkovich and Maier, {Ronald V.}",
year = "2006",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/01.ta.0000219936.72483.6a",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "61",
pages = "949--953",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Do trauma centers have the capacity to respond to disasters?

AU - Rivara, Frederick P.

AU - Nathens, Avery B.

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

AU - Maier, Ronald V.

PY - 2006/10/1

Y1 - 2006/10/1

N2 - BACKGROUND: Concern has been raised about the capacity of trauma centers to absorb large numbers of additional patients from mass casualty events. Our objective was to examine the capacity of current centers to handle an increased load from a mass casualty disaster. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of Level I and II trauma centers. They were contacted by mail and asked to respond to questions about their surge capacity as of July 4, 2005. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 133 centers. On July 4, 2005 there were a median of 77 beds available in Level I and 84 in Level II trauma centers. Fifteen percent of the Level I and 12.2% of the Level II centers had a census at 95% capacity or greater. In the first 6 hours, each Level I center would be able to operate on 38 patients, while each Level II center would be able to operate on 22 patients. Based on available data, there are 10 trauma centers available to an average American within 60 minutes. Given the available bed capacity, a total of 812 beds would be available within a 60-minute transport distance in a mass casualty event. CONCLUSIONS: There is capacity to care for the number of serious non-fatally injured patients resulting from the types of mass casualties recently experienced. If there is a further continued shift of uninsured patients to and fiscally driven closure of trauma centers, the surge capacity could be severely compromised.

AB - BACKGROUND: Concern has been raised about the capacity of trauma centers to absorb large numbers of additional patients from mass casualty events. Our objective was to examine the capacity of current centers to handle an increased load from a mass casualty disaster. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of Level I and II trauma centers. They were contacted by mail and asked to respond to questions about their surge capacity as of July 4, 2005. RESULTS: Data were obtained from 133 centers. On July 4, 2005 there were a median of 77 beds available in Level I and 84 in Level II trauma centers. Fifteen percent of the Level I and 12.2% of the Level II centers had a census at 95% capacity or greater. In the first 6 hours, each Level I center would be able to operate on 38 patients, while each Level II center would be able to operate on 22 patients. Based on available data, there are 10 trauma centers available to an average American within 60 minutes. Given the available bed capacity, a total of 812 beds would be available within a 60-minute transport distance in a mass casualty event. CONCLUSIONS: There is capacity to care for the number of serious non-fatally injured patients resulting from the types of mass casualties recently experienced. If there is a further continued shift of uninsured patients to and fiscally driven closure of trauma centers, the surge capacity could be severely compromised.

KW - Capacity

KW - Disaster

KW - Terrorism

KW - Trauma

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750015248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33750015248&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/01.ta.0000219936.72483.6a

DO - 10.1097/01.ta.0000219936.72483.6a

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 949

EP - 953

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 4

ER -