Distinguishing screening from diagnostic mammograms using medicare claims data

Joshua J Fenton, Weiwei Zhu, Steven Balch, Rebecca Smith-Bindman, Paul Fishman, Rebecca A. Hubbard

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medicare claims data may be a fruitful data source for research or quality measurement in mammography. However, it is uncertain whether claims data can accurately distinguish screening from diagnostic mammograms, particularly when claims are not linked with cancer registry data. OBJECTIVES: To validate claims-based algorithms that can identify screening mammograms with high positive predictive value (PPV) in claims data with and without cancer registry linkage. RESEARCH DESIGN: Development of claims-derived algorithms using classification and regression tree analyses within a random half-sample of bilateral mammogram claims with validation in the remaining half-sample. SUBJECTS: Female fee-for-service Medicare enrollees aged 66 years and older, who underwent bilateral mammography from 1999 to 2005 within Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) registries in 4 states (CA, NC, NH, and VT), enabling linkage of claims and BCSC mammography data (N=383,730 mammograms obtained from 146,346 women). MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of algorithmic designation of a "screening" purpose of the mammogram using a BCSC-derived reference standard. RESULTS: In claims data without cancer registry linkage, a 3-step claims-derived algorithm identified screening mammograms with 97.1% sensitivity, 69.4% specificity, and a PPV of 94.9%. In claims that are linked to cancer registry data, a similar 3-step algorithm had higher sensitivity (99.7%), similar specificity (62.7%), and higher PPV (97.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Simple algorithms can identify Medicare claims for screening mammography with high predictive values in Medicare claims alone and in claims linked with cancer registry data.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMedical Care
Volume52
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Medicare
Registries
Mammography
Neoplasms
Breast Neoplasms
Sensitivity and Specificity
Fee-for-Service Plans
Information Storage and Retrieval
Regression Analysis
Research

Keywords

  • breast cancer screening
  • mammography
  • Medicare
  • quality assessment
  • validation studies

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Distinguishing screening from diagnostic mammograms using medicare claims data. / Fenton, Joshua J; Zhu, Weiwei; Balch, Steven; Smith-Bindman, Rebecca; Fishman, Paul; Hubbard, Rebecca A.

In: Medical Care, Vol. 52, No. 7, 2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Fenton, Joshua J ; Zhu, Weiwei ; Balch, Steven ; Smith-Bindman, Rebecca ; Fishman, Paul ; Hubbard, Rebecca A. / Distinguishing screening from diagnostic mammograms using medicare claims data. In: Medical Care. 2014 ; Vol. 52, No. 7.
@article{c45a8b12c64349bdbb17eef745d589e4,
title = "Distinguishing screening from diagnostic mammograms using medicare claims data",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Medicare claims data may be a fruitful data source for research or quality measurement in mammography. However, it is uncertain whether claims data can accurately distinguish screening from diagnostic mammograms, particularly when claims are not linked with cancer registry data. OBJECTIVES: To validate claims-based algorithms that can identify screening mammograms with high positive predictive value (PPV) in claims data with and without cancer registry linkage. RESEARCH DESIGN: Development of claims-derived algorithms using classification and regression tree analyses within a random half-sample of bilateral mammogram claims with validation in the remaining half-sample. SUBJECTS: Female fee-for-service Medicare enrollees aged 66 years and older, who underwent bilateral mammography from 1999 to 2005 within Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) registries in 4 states (CA, NC, NH, and VT), enabling linkage of claims and BCSC mammography data (N=383,730 mammograms obtained from 146,346 women). MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of algorithmic designation of a {"}screening{"} purpose of the mammogram using a BCSC-derived reference standard. RESULTS: In claims data without cancer registry linkage, a 3-step claims-derived algorithm identified screening mammograms with 97.1{\%} sensitivity, 69.4{\%} specificity, and a PPV of 94.9{\%}. In claims that are linked to cancer registry data, a similar 3-step algorithm had higher sensitivity (99.7{\%}), similar specificity (62.7{\%}), and higher PPV (97.4{\%}). CONCLUSIONS: Simple algorithms can identify Medicare claims for screening mammography with high predictive values in Medicare claims alone and in claims linked with cancer registry data.",
keywords = "breast cancer screening, mammography, Medicare, quality assessment, validation studies",
author = "Fenton, {Joshua J} and Weiwei Zhu and Steven Balch and Rebecca Smith-Bindman and Paul Fishman and Hubbard, {Rebecca A.}",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/MLR.0b013e318269e0f5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
journal = "Medical Care",
issn = "0025-7079",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distinguishing screening from diagnostic mammograms using medicare claims data

AU - Fenton, Joshua J

AU - Zhu, Weiwei

AU - Balch, Steven

AU - Smith-Bindman, Rebecca

AU - Fishman, Paul

AU - Hubbard, Rebecca A.

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - BACKGROUND: Medicare claims data may be a fruitful data source for research or quality measurement in mammography. However, it is uncertain whether claims data can accurately distinguish screening from diagnostic mammograms, particularly when claims are not linked with cancer registry data. OBJECTIVES: To validate claims-based algorithms that can identify screening mammograms with high positive predictive value (PPV) in claims data with and without cancer registry linkage. RESEARCH DESIGN: Development of claims-derived algorithms using classification and regression tree analyses within a random half-sample of bilateral mammogram claims with validation in the remaining half-sample. SUBJECTS: Female fee-for-service Medicare enrollees aged 66 years and older, who underwent bilateral mammography from 1999 to 2005 within Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) registries in 4 states (CA, NC, NH, and VT), enabling linkage of claims and BCSC mammography data (N=383,730 mammograms obtained from 146,346 women). MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of algorithmic designation of a "screening" purpose of the mammogram using a BCSC-derived reference standard. RESULTS: In claims data without cancer registry linkage, a 3-step claims-derived algorithm identified screening mammograms with 97.1% sensitivity, 69.4% specificity, and a PPV of 94.9%. In claims that are linked to cancer registry data, a similar 3-step algorithm had higher sensitivity (99.7%), similar specificity (62.7%), and higher PPV (97.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Simple algorithms can identify Medicare claims for screening mammography with high predictive values in Medicare claims alone and in claims linked with cancer registry data.

AB - BACKGROUND: Medicare claims data may be a fruitful data source for research or quality measurement in mammography. However, it is uncertain whether claims data can accurately distinguish screening from diagnostic mammograms, particularly when claims are not linked with cancer registry data. OBJECTIVES: To validate claims-based algorithms that can identify screening mammograms with high positive predictive value (PPV) in claims data with and without cancer registry linkage. RESEARCH DESIGN: Development of claims-derived algorithms using classification and regression tree analyses within a random half-sample of bilateral mammogram claims with validation in the remaining half-sample. SUBJECTS: Female fee-for-service Medicare enrollees aged 66 years and older, who underwent bilateral mammography from 1999 to 2005 within Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) registries in 4 states (CA, NC, NH, and VT), enabling linkage of claims and BCSC mammography data (N=383,730 mammograms obtained from 146,346 women). MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of algorithmic designation of a "screening" purpose of the mammogram using a BCSC-derived reference standard. RESULTS: In claims data without cancer registry linkage, a 3-step claims-derived algorithm identified screening mammograms with 97.1% sensitivity, 69.4% specificity, and a PPV of 94.9%. In claims that are linked to cancer registry data, a similar 3-step algorithm had higher sensitivity (99.7%), similar specificity (62.7%), and higher PPV (97.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Simple algorithms can identify Medicare claims for screening mammography with high predictive values in Medicare claims alone and in claims linked with cancer registry data.

KW - breast cancer screening

KW - mammography

KW - Medicare

KW - quality assessment

KW - validation studies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902482320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902482320&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318269e0f5

DO - 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318269e0f5

M3 - Article

VL - 52

JO - Medical Care

JF - Medical Care

SN - 0025-7079

IS - 7

ER -