Distal hindlimb kinematics of galloping Thoroughbred racehorses on dirt and synthetic racetrack surfaces

J. E. Symons, T. C. Garcia, Susan M Stover

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Summary: Reasons for performing study: The effect of racetrack surface (dirt or synthetic) on distal hindlimb kinematics of racehorses running at competition speeds is not known. Objectives: To compare distal hindlimb and hoof kinematics during stance of breezing (unrestrained gallop) racehorses between dirt and synthetic surfaces. Study design: Two-dimensional kinematic video analysis of 5 Thoroughbred racehorses galloping at high speeds (12-17m/s) on a dirt racetrack and a synthetic racetrack. Methods: The positions of kinematic markers applied to the left hindlimb were recorded at 500Hz. Position, velocity and acceleration of joint angles and hoof translation during stance were calculated in the sagittal plane. Peak translational and angular kinematic values were compared between the dirt and synthetic race surfaces using mixed model analyses of covariance. Results: Maximum and heel-strike metatarsophalangeal (fetlock) angles were greater (P<0.05) on the dirt surface than on the synthetic surface. Maximum fetlock angle occurred earlier during stance on the dirt surface (P<0.05). Greater horizontal displacement of the heel during slide occurred on the dirt surface (P<0.05). Conclusions: During high-speed gallop, hindlimb fetlock hyperextension and horizontal hoof slide are greater on a dirt surface than on a synthetic surface. Synthetic race surfaces may mitigate risk of injury to hindlimb fetlock structures by reducing fetlock hyperextension and associated strains in fetlock support structures. Differences in hoof slide may contribute to different distal hindlimb kinematics between surfaces.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)227-232
Number of pages6
JournalEquine Veterinary Journal
Volume46
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2014

Fingerprint

racehorses
Hindlimb
kinematics
Biomechanical Phenomena
Hoof and Claw
hooves
Heel
hindlimbs
Joints
Wounds and Injuries
translation (genetics)
experimental design

Keywords

  • Dirt
  • Horse
  • Kinematics
  • Musculoskeletal
  • Surface
  • Synthetic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Equine

Cite this

Distal hindlimb kinematics of galloping Thoroughbred racehorses on dirt and synthetic racetrack surfaces. / Symons, J. E.; Garcia, T. C.; Stover, Susan M.

In: Equine Veterinary Journal, Vol. 46, No. 2, 03.2014, p. 227-232.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{641264bf692c471bad4ebcd7e142255d,
title = "Distal hindlimb kinematics of galloping Thoroughbred racehorses on dirt and synthetic racetrack surfaces",
abstract = "Summary: Reasons for performing study: The effect of racetrack surface (dirt or synthetic) on distal hindlimb kinematics of racehorses running at competition speeds is not known. Objectives: To compare distal hindlimb and hoof kinematics during stance of breezing (unrestrained gallop) racehorses between dirt and synthetic surfaces. Study design: Two-dimensional kinematic video analysis of 5 Thoroughbred racehorses galloping at high speeds (12-17m/s) on a dirt racetrack and a synthetic racetrack. Methods: The positions of kinematic markers applied to the left hindlimb were recorded at 500Hz. Position, velocity and acceleration of joint angles and hoof translation during stance were calculated in the sagittal plane. Peak translational and angular kinematic values were compared between the dirt and synthetic race surfaces using mixed model analyses of covariance. Results: Maximum and heel-strike metatarsophalangeal (fetlock) angles were greater (P<0.05) on the dirt surface than on the synthetic surface. Maximum fetlock angle occurred earlier during stance on the dirt surface (P<0.05). Greater horizontal displacement of the heel during slide occurred on the dirt surface (P<0.05). Conclusions: During high-speed gallop, hindlimb fetlock hyperextension and horizontal hoof slide are greater on a dirt surface than on a synthetic surface. Synthetic race surfaces may mitigate risk of injury to hindlimb fetlock structures by reducing fetlock hyperextension and associated strains in fetlock support structures. Differences in hoof slide may contribute to different distal hindlimb kinematics between surfaces.",
keywords = "Dirt, Horse, Kinematics, Musculoskeletal, Surface, Synthetic",
author = "Symons, {J. E.} and Garcia, {T. C.} and Stover, {Susan M}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1111/evj.12113",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "46",
pages = "227--232",
journal = "Equine veterinary journal. Supplement",
issn = "2042-3306",
publisher = "British Equine Veterinary Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Distal hindlimb kinematics of galloping Thoroughbred racehorses on dirt and synthetic racetrack surfaces

AU - Symons, J. E.

AU - Garcia, T. C.

AU - Stover, Susan M

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - Summary: Reasons for performing study: The effect of racetrack surface (dirt or synthetic) on distal hindlimb kinematics of racehorses running at competition speeds is not known. Objectives: To compare distal hindlimb and hoof kinematics during stance of breezing (unrestrained gallop) racehorses between dirt and synthetic surfaces. Study design: Two-dimensional kinematic video analysis of 5 Thoroughbred racehorses galloping at high speeds (12-17m/s) on a dirt racetrack and a synthetic racetrack. Methods: The positions of kinematic markers applied to the left hindlimb were recorded at 500Hz. Position, velocity and acceleration of joint angles and hoof translation during stance were calculated in the sagittal plane. Peak translational and angular kinematic values were compared between the dirt and synthetic race surfaces using mixed model analyses of covariance. Results: Maximum and heel-strike metatarsophalangeal (fetlock) angles were greater (P<0.05) on the dirt surface than on the synthetic surface. Maximum fetlock angle occurred earlier during stance on the dirt surface (P<0.05). Greater horizontal displacement of the heel during slide occurred on the dirt surface (P<0.05). Conclusions: During high-speed gallop, hindlimb fetlock hyperextension and horizontal hoof slide are greater on a dirt surface than on a synthetic surface. Synthetic race surfaces may mitigate risk of injury to hindlimb fetlock structures by reducing fetlock hyperextension and associated strains in fetlock support structures. Differences in hoof slide may contribute to different distal hindlimb kinematics between surfaces.

AB - Summary: Reasons for performing study: The effect of racetrack surface (dirt or synthetic) on distal hindlimb kinematics of racehorses running at competition speeds is not known. Objectives: To compare distal hindlimb and hoof kinematics during stance of breezing (unrestrained gallop) racehorses between dirt and synthetic surfaces. Study design: Two-dimensional kinematic video analysis of 5 Thoroughbred racehorses galloping at high speeds (12-17m/s) on a dirt racetrack and a synthetic racetrack. Methods: The positions of kinematic markers applied to the left hindlimb were recorded at 500Hz. Position, velocity and acceleration of joint angles and hoof translation during stance were calculated in the sagittal plane. Peak translational and angular kinematic values were compared between the dirt and synthetic race surfaces using mixed model analyses of covariance. Results: Maximum and heel-strike metatarsophalangeal (fetlock) angles were greater (P<0.05) on the dirt surface than on the synthetic surface. Maximum fetlock angle occurred earlier during stance on the dirt surface (P<0.05). Greater horizontal displacement of the heel during slide occurred on the dirt surface (P<0.05). Conclusions: During high-speed gallop, hindlimb fetlock hyperextension and horizontal hoof slide are greater on a dirt surface than on a synthetic surface. Synthetic race surfaces may mitigate risk of injury to hindlimb fetlock structures by reducing fetlock hyperextension and associated strains in fetlock support structures. Differences in hoof slide may contribute to different distal hindlimb kinematics between surfaces.

KW - Dirt

KW - Horse

KW - Kinematics

KW - Musculoskeletal

KW - Surface

KW - Synthetic

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894274243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894274243&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/evj.12113

DO - 10.1111/evj.12113

M3 - Article

C2 - 23742040

AN - SCOPUS:84894274243

VL - 46

SP - 227

EP - 232

JO - Equine veterinary journal. Supplement

JF - Equine veterinary journal. Supplement

SN - 2042-3306

IS - 2

ER -