Disseminating alcohol screening and brief intervention at trauma centers

A policy-relevant cluster randomized effectiveness trial

Douglas Zatzick, Dennis M. Donovan, Gregory Jurkovich, Larry Gentilello, Chris Dunn, Joan Russo, Jin Wang, Christopher D. Zatzick, Jeff Love, Collin Mcfadden, Frederick P. Rivara

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Aims: In 2005 the American College of Surgeons passed a mandate requiring that level I trauma centers have mechanisms to identify and intervene with problem drinkers. The aim of this investigation was to determine if a multi-level trauma center intervention targeting both providers and patients would lead to higher-quality alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) when compared with trauma center mandate compliance without implementation enhancements. Design: Cluster randomized trial in which intervention site (site n=10, patient n=409) providers received 1-day workshop training on evidence-based motivational interviewing (MI) alcohol interventions and four 30-minute feedback and coaching sessions; control sites (site n=10, patient n=469) implemented the mandate without study team training enhancements. Setting: Trauma centers in the United States of America. Participants: A total of 878 blood alcohol-positive in-patients with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI). Measurements: MI skills of providers were assessed with fidelity coded standardized patient interviews. All patients were interviewed at baseline and 6- and 12-months post-injury with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Findings: Intervention site providers consistently demonstrated enhanced MI skills compared with control providers. Intervention patients demonstrated an 8% reduction in AUDIT hazardous drinking relative to controls over the course of the year after injury (relative risk=0.88, 95%, confidence interval=0.79, 0.98). Intervention patients were more likely to demonstrate improvements in alcohol use problems in the absence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) (P=0.002). Conclusion: Trauma center providers can be trained to deliver higher-quality alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) than untrained providers, which is associated with modest reductions in alcohol use problems, particularly among patients without TBI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)754-765
Number of pages12
JournalAddiction
Volume109
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Trauma Centers
Alcohols
Motivational Interviewing
Wounds and Injuries
Drinking
Compliance
Confidence Intervals
Interviews
Education

Keywords

  • Alcohol
  • American College of Surgeons
  • Dissemination and implementation research
  • Motivational interviewing
  • Policy mandate
  • Screening and brief intervention
  • Traumatic brain injury

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine (miscellaneous)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Disseminating alcohol screening and brief intervention at trauma centers : A policy-relevant cluster randomized effectiveness trial. / Zatzick, Douglas; Donovan, Dennis M.; Jurkovich, Gregory; Gentilello, Larry; Dunn, Chris; Russo, Joan; Wang, Jin; Zatzick, Christopher D.; Love, Jeff; Mcfadden, Collin; Rivara, Frederick P.

In: Addiction, Vol. 109, No. 5, 01.01.2014, p. 754-765.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Zatzick, D, Donovan, DM, Jurkovich, G, Gentilello, L, Dunn, C, Russo, J, Wang, J, Zatzick, CD, Love, J, Mcfadden, C & Rivara, FP 2014, 'Disseminating alcohol screening and brief intervention at trauma centers: A policy-relevant cluster randomized effectiveness trial', Addiction, vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 754-765. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12492
Zatzick, Douglas ; Donovan, Dennis M. ; Jurkovich, Gregory ; Gentilello, Larry ; Dunn, Chris ; Russo, Joan ; Wang, Jin ; Zatzick, Christopher D. ; Love, Jeff ; Mcfadden, Collin ; Rivara, Frederick P. / Disseminating alcohol screening and brief intervention at trauma centers : A policy-relevant cluster randomized effectiveness trial. In: Addiction. 2014 ; Vol. 109, No. 5. pp. 754-765.
@article{972f82b472414cdda01c7a2b828e5103,
title = "Disseminating alcohol screening and brief intervention at trauma centers: A policy-relevant cluster randomized effectiveness trial",
abstract = "Background and Aims: In 2005 the American College of Surgeons passed a mandate requiring that level I trauma centers have mechanisms to identify and intervene with problem drinkers. The aim of this investigation was to determine if a multi-level trauma center intervention targeting both providers and patients would lead to higher-quality alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) when compared with trauma center mandate compliance without implementation enhancements. Design: Cluster randomized trial in which intervention site (site n=10, patient n=409) providers received 1-day workshop training on evidence-based motivational interviewing (MI) alcohol interventions and four 30-minute feedback and coaching sessions; control sites (site n=10, patient n=469) implemented the mandate without study team training enhancements. Setting: Trauma centers in the United States of America. Participants: A total of 878 blood alcohol-positive in-patients with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI). Measurements: MI skills of providers were assessed with fidelity coded standardized patient interviews. All patients were interviewed at baseline and 6- and 12-months post-injury with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Findings: Intervention site providers consistently demonstrated enhanced MI skills compared with control providers. Intervention patients demonstrated an 8{\%} reduction in AUDIT hazardous drinking relative to controls over the course of the year after injury (relative risk=0.88, 95{\%}, confidence interval=0.79, 0.98). Intervention patients were more likely to demonstrate improvements in alcohol use problems in the absence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) (P=0.002). Conclusion: Trauma center providers can be trained to deliver higher-quality alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) than untrained providers, which is associated with modest reductions in alcohol use problems, particularly among patients without TBI.",
keywords = "Alcohol, American College of Surgeons, Dissemination and implementation research, Motivational interviewing, Policy mandate, Screening and brief intervention, Traumatic brain injury",
author = "Douglas Zatzick and Donovan, {Dennis M.} and Gregory Jurkovich and Larry Gentilello and Chris Dunn and Joan Russo and Jin Wang and Zatzick, {Christopher D.} and Jeff Love and Collin Mcfadden and Rivara, {Frederick P.}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/add.12492",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "109",
pages = "754--765",
journal = "Addiction",
issn = "0965-2140",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disseminating alcohol screening and brief intervention at trauma centers

T2 - A policy-relevant cluster randomized effectiveness trial

AU - Zatzick, Douglas

AU - Donovan, Dennis M.

AU - Jurkovich, Gregory

AU - Gentilello, Larry

AU - Dunn, Chris

AU - Russo, Joan

AU - Wang, Jin

AU - Zatzick, Christopher D.

AU - Love, Jeff

AU - Mcfadden, Collin

AU - Rivara, Frederick P.

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Background and Aims: In 2005 the American College of Surgeons passed a mandate requiring that level I trauma centers have mechanisms to identify and intervene with problem drinkers. The aim of this investigation was to determine if a multi-level trauma center intervention targeting both providers and patients would lead to higher-quality alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) when compared with trauma center mandate compliance without implementation enhancements. Design: Cluster randomized trial in which intervention site (site n=10, patient n=409) providers received 1-day workshop training on evidence-based motivational interviewing (MI) alcohol interventions and four 30-minute feedback and coaching sessions; control sites (site n=10, patient n=469) implemented the mandate without study team training enhancements. Setting: Trauma centers in the United States of America. Participants: A total of 878 blood alcohol-positive in-patients with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI). Measurements: MI skills of providers were assessed with fidelity coded standardized patient interviews. All patients were interviewed at baseline and 6- and 12-months post-injury with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Findings: Intervention site providers consistently demonstrated enhanced MI skills compared with control providers. Intervention patients demonstrated an 8% reduction in AUDIT hazardous drinking relative to controls over the course of the year after injury (relative risk=0.88, 95%, confidence interval=0.79, 0.98). Intervention patients were more likely to demonstrate improvements in alcohol use problems in the absence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) (P=0.002). Conclusion: Trauma center providers can be trained to deliver higher-quality alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) than untrained providers, which is associated with modest reductions in alcohol use problems, particularly among patients without TBI.

AB - Background and Aims: In 2005 the American College of Surgeons passed a mandate requiring that level I trauma centers have mechanisms to identify and intervene with problem drinkers. The aim of this investigation was to determine if a multi-level trauma center intervention targeting both providers and patients would lead to higher-quality alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) when compared with trauma center mandate compliance without implementation enhancements. Design: Cluster randomized trial in which intervention site (site n=10, patient n=409) providers received 1-day workshop training on evidence-based motivational interviewing (MI) alcohol interventions and four 30-minute feedback and coaching sessions; control sites (site n=10, patient n=469) implemented the mandate without study team training enhancements. Setting: Trauma centers in the United States of America. Participants: A total of 878 blood alcohol-positive in-patients with and without traumatic brain injury (TBI). Measurements: MI skills of providers were assessed with fidelity coded standardized patient interviews. All patients were interviewed at baseline and 6- and 12-months post-injury with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT). Findings: Intervention site providers consistently demonstrated enhanced MI skills compared with control providers. Intervention patients demonstrated an 8% reduction in AUDIT hazardous drinking relative to controls over the course of the year after injury (relative risk=0.88, 95%, confidence interval=0.79, 0.98). Intervention patients were more likely to demonstrate improvements in alcohol use problems in the absence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) (P=0.002). Conclusion: Trauma center providers can be trained to deliver higher-quality alcohol screening and brief intervention (SBI) than untrained providers, which is associated with modest reductions in alcohol use problems, particularly among patients without TBI.

KW - Alcohol

KW - American College of Surgeons

KW - Dissemination and implementation research

KW - Motivational interviewing

KW - Policy mandate

KW - Screening and brief intervention

KW - Traumatic brain injury

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84898045783&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84898045783&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/add.12492

DO - 10.1111/add.12492

M3 - Article

VL - 109

SP - 754

EP - 765

JO - Addiction

JF - Addiction

SN - 0965-2140

IS - 5

ER -