Disclaiming: A Test Of Two Competing Views

Robert A Bell, Christopher J. Zahn, Robert Hopper

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Sociologists Hewitt and Stokes (1975) argue that disclaiming is a positive interactional tactic used to define forthcoming problematic actions as irrelevant to one's established identity. Several researchers interested in speech styles argue that disclaiming negatively impacts on one's identity by creating an image of powerlessness. The findings of an experiment reported here suggest that disclaimers have no effect, positive or negative, on others’ credibility attributions. This finding is inconsistent with past speech styles research. A second study supported a “hammer effect” reinterpretation of these studies. It was only when subjects were presented with an unrealistic number of disclaimers that adverse effects for disclaiming were found.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)28-36
Number of pages9
JournalCommunication Quarterly
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1984
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hammers
sociologist
credibility
tactics
attribution
Experiments
experiment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Communication

Cite this

Disclaiming : A Test Of Two Competing Views. / Bell, Robert A; Zahn, Christopher J.; Hopper, Robert.

In: Communication Quarterly, Vol. 32, No. 1, 1984, p. 28-36.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Bell, Robert A ; Zahn, Christopher J. ; Hopper, Robert. / Disclaiming : A Test Of Two Competing Views. In: Communication Quarterly. 1984 ; Vol. 32, No. 1. pp. 28-36.
@article{0b25004b94a54d5399c31caf346ff810,
title = "Disclaiming: A Test Of Two Competing Views",
abstract = "Sociologists Hewitt and Stokes (1975) argue that disclaiming is a positive interactional tactic used to define forthcoming problematic actions as irrelevant to one's established identity. Several researchers interested in speech styles argue that disclaiming negatively impacts on one's identity by creating an image of powerlessness. The findings of an experiment reported here suggest that disclaimers have no effect, positive or negative, on others’ credibility attributions. This finding is inconsistent with past speech styles research. A second study supported a “hammer effect” reinterpretation of these studies. It was only when subjects were presented with an unrealistic number of disclaimers that adverse effects for disclaiming were found.",
author = "Bell, {Robert A} and Zahn, {Christopher J.} and Robert Hopper",
year = "1984",
doi = "10.1080/01463378409369528",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "32",
pages = "28--36",
journal = "Communication Quarterly",
issn = "0146-3373",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Disclaiming

T2 - A Test Of Two Competing Views

AU - Bell, Robert A

AU - Zahn, Christopher J.

AU - Hopper, Robert

PY - 1984

Y1 - 1984

N2 - Sociologists Hewitt and Stokes (1975) argue that disclaiming is a positive interactional tactic used to define forthcoming problematic actions as irrelevant to one's established identity. Several researchers interested in speech styles argue that disclaiming negatively impacts on one's identity by creating an image of powerlessness. The findings of an experiment reported here suggest that disclaimers have no effect, positive or negative, on others’ credibility attributions. This finding is inconsistent with past speech styles research. A second study supported a “hammer effect” reinterpretation of these studies. It was only when subjects were presented with an unrealistic number of disclaimers that adverse effects for disclaiming were found.

AB - Sociologists Hewitt and Stokes (1975) argue that disclaiming is a positive interactional tactic used to define forthcoming problematic actions as irrelevant to one's established identity. Several researchers interested in speech styles argue that disclaiming negatively impacts on one's identity by creating an image of powerlessness. The findings of an experiment reported here suggest that disclaimers have no effect, positive or negative, on others’ credibility attributions. This finding is inconsistent with past speech styles research. A second study supported a “hammer effect” reinterpretation of these studies. It was only when subjects were presented with an unrealistic number of disclaimers that adverse effects for disclaiming were found.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926281618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926281618&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01463378409369528

DO - 10.1080/01463378409369528

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84926281618

VL - 32

SP - 28

EP - 36

JO - Communication Quarterly

JF - Communication Quarterly

SN - 0146-3373

IS - 1

ER -