Direction of comparison asymmetries in relational judgment: The role of linguistic norms

Neal J. Roese, Jeffrey Sherman, Taekyun Hur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This research documented a linguistic norm account of direction of comparison asymmetry effects in relational judgments (e.g., seeing hyenas as more similar to dogs than dogs are similar to hyenas). The asymmetry effect is magnified by discrepancies in prominence between subject and referent, and has previously been explained using Tversky's (1977) feature-matching model. Given a linguistic norm to place more prominent objects in the referent position, violation of this norm might reduce sentence clarity, which then weakens the magnitude of subsequent relational judgments. This research showed that clarity perceptions predict the magnitude of relational judgments independently of the cognitive manipulation of the features of the compared objects. The pattern of findings suggests that a linguistic norm interpretation may account for variance in relational judgments independently of Tversky's (1977) feature-matching model.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)353-362
Number of pages10
JournalSocial Cognition
Volume16
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Linguistics
Hyaenidae
Dogs
Research
Direction compound

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Direction of comparison asymmetries in relational judgment : The role of linguistic norms. / Roese, Neal J.; Sherman, Jeffrey; Hur, Taekyun.

In: Social Cognition, Vol. 16, No. 3, 01.01.1998, p. 353-362.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{cfaf819a104748b5bcbc536935a2c110,
title = "Direction of comparison asymmetries in relational judgment: The role of linguistic norms",
abstract = "This research documented a linguistic norm account of direction of comparison asymmetry effects in relational judgments (e.g., seeing hyenas as more similar to dogs than dogs are similar to hyenas). The asymmetry effect is magnified by discrepancies in prominence between subject and referent, and has previously been explained using Tversky's (1977) feature-matching model. Given a linguistic norm to place more prominent objects in the referent position, violation of this norm might reduce sentence clarity, which then weakens the magnitude of subsequent relational judgments. This research showed that clarity perceptions predict the magnitude of relational judgments independently of the cognitive manipulation of the features of the compared objects. The pattern of findings suggests that a linguistic norm interpretation may account for variance in relational judgments independently of Tversky's (1977) feature-matching model.",
author = "Roese, {Neal J.} and Jeffrey Sherman and Taekyun Hur",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1521/soco.1998.16.3.353",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "16",
pages = "353--362",
journal = "Social Cognition",
issn = "0278-016X",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Direction of comparison asymmetries in relational judgment

T2 - The role of linguistic norms

AU - Roese, Neal J.

AU - Sherman, Jeffrey

AU - Hur, Taekyun

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - This research documented a linguistic norm account of direction of comparison asymmetry effects in relational judgments (e.g., seeing hyenas as more similar to dogs than dogs are similar to hyenas). The asymmetry effect is magnified by discrepancies in prominence between subject and referent, and has previously been explained using Tversky's (1977) feature-matching model. Given a linguistic norm to place more prominent objects in the referent position, violation of this norm might reduce sentence clarity, which then weakens the magnitude of subsequent relational judgments. This research showed that clarity perceptions predict the magnitude of relational judgments independently of the cognitive manipulation of the features of the compared objects. The pattern of findings suggests that a linguistic norm interpretation may account for variance in relational judgments independently of Tversky's (1977) feature-matching model.

AB - This research documented a linguistic norm account of direction of comparison asymmetry effects in relational judgments (e.g., seeing hyenas as more similar to dogs than dogs are similar to hyenas). The asymmetry effect is magnified by discrepancies in prominence between subject and referent, and has previously been explained using Tversky's (1977) feature-matching model. Given a linguistic norm to place more prominent objects in the referent position, violation of this norm might reduce sentence clarity, which then weakens the magnitude of subsequent relational judgments. This research showed that clarity perceptions predict the magnitude of relational judgments independently of the cognitive manipulation of the features of the compared objects. The pattern of findings suggests that a linguistic norm interpretation may account for variance in relational judgments independently of Tversky's (1977) feature-matching model.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032350362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032350362&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1521/soco.1998.16.3.353

DO - 10.1521/soco.1998.16.3.353

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032350362

VL - 16

SP - 353

EP - 362

JO - Social Cognition

JF - Social Cognition

SN - 0278-016X

IS - 3

ER -