Direct and indirect contact rates among beef, dairy, goat, sheep, and swine herds in three California counties, with reference to control of potential foot-and-mouth disease transmission

Thomas W. Bates, Mark Thurmond, Tim Carpenter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

69 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective - To estimate direct and indirect contact rates on livestock facilities and distance traveled between herd contacts. Sample Population - 320 beef, dairy, goat, sheep, and swine herds, 7 artificial insemination technicians, 6 hoof trimmers, 15 veterinarians, 4 sales yard owners, and 7 managers of livestock-related companies within a 3-county region of California. Procedure - A questionnaire was mailed to livestock producers, and personal and telephone interviews were conducted with individuals. Results - Mean monthly direct contact rates were 2.6, 1.6, and 2.0 for dairies with < 1,000, 1,000 to 1,999, and ≥ 2,000 cattle, respectively. Mean indirect contact rates on dairies ranged from 234 to 743 contacts/mo and increased by 1 contact/mo as herd size increased by 4.3. Mean direct monthly contact rate for beef herds was 0.4. Distance traveled by personnel and vehicles during a 3-day period ranged from 58.4 to 210.4 km. Of livestock arriving at sales yards, 7% (500/7,072) came from ≥ 60 km away, and of those sold, 32% (1,180/3,721) were destined for a location ≥ 60 km away. Fifty-five percent (16/29) of owners of large beef herds observed deer or elk within 150 m of livestock at least once per month. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance - Direct and indirect contacts occur on livestock facilities located over a wide geographic area and at a higher frequency on larger facilities. Knowledge of contact rates may be useful for planning biosecurity programs at the herd, state, and national levels and for modeling transmission potential for foot-and-mouth disease virus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1121-1129
Number of pages9
JournalAmerican Journal of Veterinary Research
Volume62
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

indirect contact
Foot-and-Mouth Disease
dairy goats
foot-and-mouth disease
Livestock
disease transmission
direct contact
Goats
Sheep
beef
Swine
livestock
herds
sheep
swine
sales
dairies
Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus
Hoof and Claw
Artificial Insemination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • veterinary(all)

Cite this

@article{b823da7001004d0e9f55ad3a1a3e5411,
title = "Direct and indirect contact rates among beef, dairy, goat, sheep, and swine herds in three California counties, with reference to control of potential foot-and-mouth disease transmission",
abstract = "Objective - To estimate direct and indirect contact rates on livestock facilities and distance traveled between herd contacts. Sample Population - 320 beef, dairy, goat, sheep, and swine herds, 7 artificial insemination technicians, 6 hoof trimmers, 15 veterinarians, 4 sales yard owners, and 7 managers of livestock-related companies within a 3-county region of California. Procedure - A questionnaire was mailed to livestock producers, and personal and telephone interviews were conducted with individuals. Results - Mean monthly direct contact rates were 2.6, 1.6, and 2.0 for dairies with < 1,000, 1,000 to 1,999, and ≥ 2,000 cattle, respectively. Mean indirect contact rates on dairies ranged from 234 to 743 contacts/mo and increased by 1 contact/mo as herd size increased by 4.3. Mean direct monthly contact rate for beef herds was 0.4. Distance traveled by personnel and vehicles during a 3-day period ranged from 58.4 to 210.4 km. Of livestock arriving at sales yards, 7{\%} (500/7,072) came from ≥ 60 km away, and of those sold, 32{\%} (1,180/3,721) were destined for a location ≥ 60 km away. Fifty-five percent (16/29) of owners of large beef herds observed deer or elk within 150 m of livestock at least once per month. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance - Direct and indirect contacts occur on livestock facilities located over a wide geographic area and at a higher frequency on larger facilities. Knowledge of contact rates may be useful for planning biosecurity programs at the herd, state, and national levels and for modeling transmission potential for foot-and-mouth disease virus.",
author = "Bates, {Thomas W.} and Mark Thurmond and Tim Carpenter",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.1121",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "62",
pages = "1121--1129",
journal = "American Journal of Veterinary Research",
issn = "0002-9645",
publisher = "American Veterinary Medical Association",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Direct and indirect contact rates among beef, dairy, goat, sheep, and swine herds in three California counties, with reference to control of potential foot-and-mouth disease transmission

AU - Bates, Thomas W.

AU - Thurmond, Mark

AU - Carpenter, Tim

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - Objective - To estimate direct and indirect contact rates on livestock facilities and distance traveled between herd contacts. Sample Population - 320 beef, dairy, goat, sheep, and swine herds, 7 artificial insemination technicians, 6 hoof trimmers, 15 veterinarians, 4 sales yard owners, and 7 managers of livestock-related companies within a 3-county region of California. Procedure - A questionnaire was mailed to livestock producers, and personal and telephone interviews were conducted with individuals. Results - Mean monthly direct contact rates were 2.6, 1.6, and 2.0 for dairies with < 1,000, 1,000 to 1,999, and ≥ 2,000 cattle, respectively. Mean indirect contact rates on dairies ranged from 234 to 743 contacts/mo and increased by 1 contact/mo as herd size increased by 4.3. Mean direct monthly contact rate for beef herds was 0.4. Distance traveled by personnel and vehicles during a 3-day period ranged from 58.4 to 210.4 km. Of livestock arriving at sales yards, 7% (500/7,072) came from ≥ 60 km away, and of those sold, 32% (1,180/3,721) were destined for a location ≥ 60 km away. Fifty-five percent (16/29) of owners of large beef herds observed deer or elk within 150 m of livestock at least once per month. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance - Direct and indirect contacts occur on livestock facilities located over a wide geographic area and at a higher frequency on larger facilities. Knowledge of contact rates may be useful for planning biosecurity programs at the herd, state, and national levels and for modeling transmission potential for foot-and-mouth disease virus.

AB - Objective - To estimate direct and indirect contact rates on livestock facilities and distance traveled between herd contacts. Sample Population - 320 beef, dairy, goat, sheep, and swine herds, 7 artificial insemination technicians, 6 hoof trimmers, 15 veterinarians, 4 sales yard owners, and 7 managers of livestock-related companies within a 3-county region of California. Procedure - A questionnaire was mailed to livestock producers, and personal and telephone interviews were conducted with individuals. Results - Mean monthly direct contact rates were 2.6, 1.6, and 2.0 for dairies with < 1,000, 1,000 to 1,999, and ≥ 2,000 cattle, respectively. Mean indirect contact rates on dairies ranged from 234 to 743 contacts/mo and increased by 1 contact/mo as herd size increased by 4.3. Mean direct monthly contact rate for beef herds was 0.4. Distance traveled by personnel and vehicles during a 3-day period ranged from 58.4 to 210.4 km. Of livestock arriving at sales yards, 7% (500/7,072) came from ≥ 60 km away, and of those sold, 32% (1,180/3,721) were destined for a location ≥ 60 km away. Fifty-five percent (16/29) of owners of large beef herds observed deer or elk within 150 m of livestock at least once per month. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance - Direct and indirect contacts occur on livestock facilities located over a wide geographic area and at a higher frequency on larger facilities. Knowledge of contact rates may be useful for planning biosecurity programs at the herd, state, and national levels and for modeling transmission potential for foot-and-mouth disease virus.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035405952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035405952&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.1121

DO - 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.1121

M3 - Article

C2 - 11453490

AN - SCOPUS:0035405952

VL - 62

SP - 1121

EP - 1129

JO - American Journal of Veterinary Research

JF - American Journal of Veterinary Research

SN - 0002-9645

IS - 7

ER -