Differences in the mix of patients among medical specialties and systems of care: Results from the medical outcomes study

Richard L Kravitz, Sheldon Greenfield, William Rogers, Willard G. Manning, Michael Zubkoff, Eugene C. Nelson, Alvin R. Tarlov, John E. Ware

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

220 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective. - To determine differences in the mix of patients among medical specialties and among organizational systems of care. Study Design. - Cross-sectional analysis of 20158 adults (≥18 years of age) who visited providers' offices during 9-day screening periods in 1986. Patient and physician information was obtained by self-administered, standardized questionnaires. Setting. - Offices of 349 physicians practicing family medicine, internal medicine, endocrinology, and cardiology within health maintenance organizations, large multispecialty groups, and solo or small single-specialty group practices in three major US cities. Outcome Measures. - Demographic characteristics, prevalence of chronic disease, disease-specific severity of illness, and functional status and well-being. Results. - Among patients with selected physician-reported chronic illnesses (diabetes, hypertension, recent myocardial infarction, or congestive heart failure), increasing levels of severity were associated with decreasing levels of functional status and well-being and with increased hospitalizations, more physician visits, and higher numbers of prescription drugs. Compared with patients of general internists, patients of cardiologists were older (56 vs 47 years, P<.01), had worse functional status and well-being scores (P<.01), and carried more chronic diagnoses (mean 1.32 vs 1.02, P<.01); patients of family practitioners were younger (40 vs 47 years, P<.01) and more functional (P<.01), carried fewer chronic diagnoses (0.70 vs 1.02, P<.01), and (among diabetic patients only) had lower disease-specific severity scores (2.06 vs 2.30 on a five-point scale, P<.01). Compared with patients in health maintenance organizations, patients visiting solo practitioners under fee-for-service payment were older (50 vs 45 years, P<.01) and sicker (had worse physical functioning) and had a higher mean number of chronic diagnoses (1.10 vs 0.93, P<.01). Conclusion. - Patient mix is related to utilization and differs significantly across medical specialties and systems of care. These differences must be taken into account when interpreting variations in utilization and outcomes across specialties and systems, and when considering alternative policies for payment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1617-1623
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the American Medical Association
Volume267
Issue number12
StatePublished - Mar 25 1992

Fingerprint

Medicine
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Health Maintenance Organizations
Physicians
Chronic Disease
Fee-for-Service Plans
Physicians' Offices
Group Practice
Prescription Drugs
Endocrinology
Family Physicians
Internal Medicine
Cardiology
Hospitalization
Heart Failure
Cross-Sectional Studies
Myocardial Infarction
Demography
Hypertension

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Kravitz, R. L., Greenfield, S., Rogers, W., Manning, W. G., Zubkoff, M., Nelson, E. C., ... Ware, J. E. (1992). Differences in the mix of patients among medical specialties and systems of care: Results from the medical outcomes study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 267(12), 1617-1623.

Differences in the mix of patients among medical specialties and systems of care : Results from the medical outcomes study. / Kravitz, Richard L; Greenfield, Sheldon; Rogers, William; Manning, Willard G.; Zubkoff, Michael; Nelson, Eugene C.; Tarlov, Alvin R.; Ware, John E.

In: Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 267, No. 12, 25.03.1992, p. 1617-1623.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kravitz, RL, Greenfield, S, Rogers, W, Manning, WG, Zubkoff, M, Nelson, EC, Tarlov, AR & Ware, JE 1992, 'Differences in the mix of patients among medical specialties and systems of care: Results from the medical outcomes study', Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 267, no. 12, pp. 1617-1623.
Kravitz, Richard L ; Greenfield, Sheldon ; Rogers, William ; Manning, Willard G. ; Zubkoff, Michael ; Nelson, Eugene C. ; Tarlov, Alvin R. ; Ware, John E. / Differences in the mix of patients among medical specialties and systems of care : Results from the medical outcomes study. In: Journal of the American Medical Association. 1992 ; Vol. 267, No. 12. pp. 1617-1623.
@article{d49d5a412e2c43cb98f8e30a62d35b7b,
title = "Differences in the mix of patients among medical specialties and systems of care: Results from the medical outcomes study",
abstract = "Objective. - To determine differences in the mix of patients among medical specialties and among organizational systems of care. Study Design. - Cross-sectional analysis of 20158 adults (≥18 years of age) who visited providers' offices during 9-day screening periods in 1986. Patient and physician information was obtained by self-administered, standardized questionnaires. Setting. - Offices of 349 physicians practicing family medicine, internal medicine, endocrinology, and cardiology within health maintenance organizations, large multispecialty groups, and solo or small single-specialty group practices in three major US cities. Outcome Measures. - Demographic characteristics, prevalence of chronic disease, disease-specific severity of illness, and functional status and well-being. Results. - Among patients with selected physician-reported chronic illnesses (diabetes, hypertension, recent myocardial infarction, or congestive heart failure), increasing levels of severity were associated with decreasing levels of functional status and well-being and with increased hospitalizations, more physician visits, and higher numbers of prescription drugs. Compared with patients of general internists, patients of cardiologists were older (56 vs 47 years, P<.01), had worse functional status and well-being scores (P<.01), and carried more chronic diagnoses (mean 1.32 vs 1.02, P<.01); patients of family practitioners were younger (40 vs 47 years, P<.01) and more functional (P<.01), carried fewer chronic diagnoses (0.70 vs 1.02, P<.01), and (among diabetic patients only) had lower disease-specific severity scores (2.06 vs 2.30 on a five-point scale, P<.01). Compared with patients in health maintenance organizations, patients visiting solo practitioners under fee-for-service payment were older (50 vs 45 years, P<.01) and sicker (had worse physical functioning) and had a higher mean number of chronic diagnoses (1.10 vs 0.93, P<.01). Conclusion. - Patient mix is related to utilization and differs significantly across medical specialties and systems of care. These differences must be taken into account when interpreting variations in utilization and outcomes across specialties and systems, and when considering alternative policies for payment.",
author = "Kravitz, {Richard L} and Sheldon Greenfield and William Rogers and Manning, {Willard G.} and Michael Zubkoff and Nelson, {Eugene C.} and Tarlov, {Alvin R.} and Ware, {John E.}",
year = "1992",
month = "3",
day = "25",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "267",
pages = "1617--1623",
journal = "JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association",
issn = "0002-9955",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differences in the mix of patients among medical specialties and systems of care

T2 - Results from the medical outcomes study

AU - Kravitz, Richard L

AU - Greenfield, Sheldon

AU - Rogers, William

AU - Manning, Willard G.

AU - Zubkoff, Michael

AU - Nelson, Eugene C.

AU - Tarlov, Alvin R.

AU - Ware, John E.

PY - 1992/3/25

Y1 - 1992/3/25

N2 - Objective. - To determine differences in the mix of patients among medical specialties and among organizational systems of care. Study Design. - Cross-sectional analysis of 20158 adults (≥18 years of age) who visited providers' offices during 9-day screening periods in 1986. Patient and physician information was obtained by self-administered, standardized questionnaires. Setting. - Offices of 349 physicians practicing family medicine, internal medicine, endocrinology, and cardiology within health maintenance organizations, large multispecialty groups, and solo or small single-specialty group practices in three major US cities. Outcome Measures. - Demographic characteristics, prevalence of chronic disease, disease-specific severity of illness, and functional status and well-being. Results. - Among patients with selected physician-reported chronic illnesses (diabetes, hypertension, recent myocardial infarction, or congestive heart failure), increasing levels of severity were associated with decreasing levels of functional status and well-being and with increased hospitalizations, more physician visits, and higher numbers of prescription drugs. Compared with patients of general internists, patients of cardiologists were older (56 vs 47 years, P<.01), had worse functional status and well-being scores (P<.01), and carried more chronic diagnoses (mean 1.32 vs 1.02, P<.01); patients of family practitioners were younger (40 vs 47 years, P<.01) and more functional (P<.01), carried fewer chronic diagnoses (0.70 vs 1.02, P<.01), and (among diabetic patients only) had lower disease-specific severity scores (2.06 vs 2.30 on a five-point scale, P<.01). Compared with patients in health maintenance organizations, patients visiting solo practitioners under fee-for-service payment were older (50 vs 45 years, P<.01) and sicker (had worse physical functioning) and had a higher mean number of chronic diagnoses (1.10 vs 0.93, P<.01). Conclusion. - Patient mix is related to utilization and differs significantly across medical specialties and systems of care. These differences must be taken into account when interpreting variations in utilization and outcomes across specialties and systems, and when considering alternative policies for payment.

AB - Objective. - To determine differences in the mix of patients among medical specialties and among organizational systems of care. Study Design. - Cross-sectional analysis of 20158 adults (≥18 years of age) who visited providers' offices during 9-day screening periods in 1986. Patient and physician information was obtained by self-administered, standardized questionnaires. Setting. - Offices of 349 physicians practicing family medicine, internal medicine, endocrinology, and cardiology within health maintenance organizations, large multispecialty groups, and solo or small single-specialty group practices in three major US cities. Outcome Measures. - Demographic characteristics, prevalence of chronic disease, disease-specific severity of illness, and functional status and well-being. Results. - Among patients with selected physician-reported chronic illnesses (diabetes, hypertension, recent myocardial infarction, or congestive heart failure), increasing levels of severity were associated with decreasing levels of functional status and well-being and with increased hospitalizations, more physician visits, and higher numbers of prescription drugs. Compared with patients of general internists, patients of cardiologists were older (56 vs 47 years, P<.01), had worse functional status and well-being scores (P<.01), and carried more chronic diagnoses (mean 1.32 vs 1.02, P<.01); patients of family practitioners were younger (40 vs 47 years, P<.01) and more functional (P<.01), carried fewer chronic diagnoses (0.70 vs 1.02, P<.01), and (among diabetic patients only) had lower disease-specific severity scores (2.06 vs 2.30 on a five-point scale, P<.01). Compared with patients in health maintenance organizations, patients visiting solo practitioners under fee-for-service payment were older (50 vs 45 years, P<.01) and sicker (had worse physical functioning) and had a higher mean number of chronic diagnoses (1.10 vs 0.93, P<.01). Conclusion. - Patient mix is related to utilization and differs significantly across medical specialties and systems of care. These differences must be taken into account when interpreting variations in utilization and outcomes across specialties and systems, and when considering alternative policies for payment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026596455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0026596455&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 1542171

AN - SCOPUS:0026596455

VL - 267

SP - 1617

EP - 1623

JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

SN - 0002-9955

IS - 12

ER -