Diagnostic sampling strategies for virulent ovine footrot: Simulating detection of Dichelobacter nodosus serogroups for bivalent vaccine formulation

Ashley E Hill, Om P. Dhungyel, Richard J. Whittington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Dichelobacter nodosus is a slow-growing anaerobic bacterium that is the causative agent of virulent ovine footrot. Vaccination targeted at up to two specific serogroups can eliminate those serogroups from infected flocks, but requires identification of serogroups present in infected flocks. Serogroups can be identified using slide agglutination or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods. The objectives of this project were to use stochastic simulation modeling to estimate the efficacy of sampling strategies encompassing 5-40 sheep per flock and 2-4 colonies per sheep, and to compare efficacies based on slide agglutination or multiplex PCR test results. Foot swabs collected from sheep in 12 flocks were used as the basis for a sampling strategy simulation model. None of the evaluated sampling strategies identified the two most common serogroups in the flock, or all serogroups present in the flock, in 95% of iterations. However, a simulated sample of 22 sheep/flock and 2 colonies/sheep resulted in a simulated vaccine that protected 95% of the sheep that could be protected by a single bivalent vaccine, while a sample of 24 sheep/flock and 2 colonies/sheep resulted in a series of simulated bivalent vaccines that protected 95% of diseased infected sheep. The difference in outcome was due to the distribution and frequency of serogroups within certain flocks where some serogroups were uncommon and others dominant. A sampling strategy (>40 sheep/flock, 4 colonies/sheep) that will identify the two most common serogroups in a flock 95% of the time may not be cost effective. Evaluating efficacy based on the expected effect on the flock may be more useful than one which seeks to determine the most common serogroups. These findings are broadly applicable to diseases where more than one strain or type of pathogen may be present and must be represented in a vaccine.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)127-136
Number of pages10
JournalPreventive Veterinary Medicine
Volume95
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dichelobacter nodosus
footrot
Sheep
flocks
serotypes
Vaccines
vaccines
sheep
sampling
Agglutination
agglutination
Serogroup
Sheep Diseases
polymerase chain reaction
Anaerobic Bacteria
Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction

Keywords

  • Dichelobacter nodosus
  • Footrot
  • Monte Carlo simulation
  • Sampling
  • Sheep-microbiological diseases
  • Vaccination

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Animal Science and Zoology
  • Food Animals

Cite this

Diagnostic sampling strategies for virulent ovine footrot : Simulating detection of Dichelobacter nodosus serogroups for bivalent vaccine formulation. / Hill, Ashley E; Dhungyel, Om P.; Whittington, Richard J.

In: Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Vol. 95, No. 1-2, 01.06.2010, p. 127-136.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b9c1e190832247a9a6eb82ad36f61f88,
title = "Diagnostic sampling strategies for virulent ovine footrot: Simulating detection of Dichelobacter nodosus serogroups for bivalent vaccine formulation",
abstract = "Dichelobacter nodosus is a slow-growing anaerobic bacterium that is the causative agent of virulent ovine footrot. Vaccination targeted at up to two specific serogroups can eliminate those serogroups from infected flocks, but requires identification of serogroups present in infected flocks. Serogroups can be identified using slide agglutination or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods. The objectives of this project were to use stochastic simulation modeling to estimate the efficacy of sampling strategies encompassing 5-40 sheep per flock and 2-4 colonies per sheep, and to compare efficacies based on slide agglutination or multiplex PCR test results. Foot swabs collected from sheep in 12 flocks were used as the basis for a sampling strategy simulation model. None of the evaluated sampling strategies identified the two most common serogroups in the flock, or all serogroups present in the flock, in 95{\%} of iterations. However, a simulated sample of 22 sheep/flock and 2 colonies/sheep resulted in a simulated vaccine that protected 95{\%} of the sheep that could be protected by a single bivalent vaccine, while a sample of 24 sheep/flock and 2 colonies/sheep resulted in a series of simulated bivalent vaccines that protected 95{\%} of diseased infected sheep. The difference in outcome was due to the distribution and frequency of serogroups within certain flocks where some serogroups were uncommon and others dominant. A sampling strategy (>40 sheep/flock, 4 colonies/sheep) that will identify the two most common serogroups in a flock 95{\%} of the time may not be cost effective. Evaluating efficacy based on the expected effect on the flock may be more useful than one which seeks to determine the most common serogroups. These findings are broadly applicable to diseases where more than one strain or type of pathogen may be present and must be represented in a vaccine.",
keywords = "Dichelobacter nodosus, Footrot, Monte Carlo simulation, Sampling, Sheep-microbiological diseases, Vaccination",
author = "Hill, {Ashley E} and Dhungyel, {Om P.} and Whittington, {Richard J.}",
year = "2010",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.02.011",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "95",
pages = "127--136",
journal = "Preventive Veterinary Medicine",
issn = "0167-5877",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnostic sampling strategies for virulent ovine footrot

T2 - Simulating detection of Dichelobacter nodosus serogroups for bivalent vaccine formulation

AU - Hill, Ashley E

AU - Dhungyel, Om P.

AU - Whittington, Richard J.

PY - 2010/6/1

Y1 - 2010/6/1

N2 - Dichelobacter nodosus is a slow-growing anaerobic bacterium that is the causative agent of virulent ovine footrot. Vaccination targeted at up to two specific serogroups can eliminate those serogroups from infected flocks, but requires identification of serogroups present in infected flocks. Serogroups can be identified using slide agglutination or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods. The objectives of this project were to use stochastic simulation modeling to estimate the efficacy of sampling strategies encompassing 5-40 sheep per flock and 2-4 colonies per sheep, and to compare efficacies based on slide agglutination or multiplex PCR test results. Foot swabs collected from sheep in 12 flocks were used as the basis for a sampling strategy simulation model. None of the evaluated sampling strategies identified the two most common serogroups in the flock, or all serogroups present in the flock, in 95% of iterations. However, a simulated sample of 22 sheep/flock and 2 colonies/sheep resulted in a simulated vaccine that protected 95% of the sheep that could be protected by a single bivalent vaccine, while a sample of 24 sheep/flock and 2 colonies/sheep resulted in a series of simulated bivalent vaccines that protected 95% of diseased infected sheep. The difference in outcome was due to the distribution and frequency of serogroups within certain flocks where some serogroups were uncommon and others dominant. A sampling strategy (>40 sheep/flock, 4 colonies/sheep) that will identify the two most common serogroups in a flock 95% of the time may not be cost effective. Evaluating efficacy based on the expected effect on the flock may be more useful than one which seeks to determine the most common serogroups. These findings are broadly applicable to diseases where more than one strain or type of pathogen may be present and must be represented in a vaccine.

AB - Dichelobacter nodosus is a slow-growing anaerobic bacterium that is the causative agent of virulent ovine footrot. Vaccination targeted at up to two specific serogroups can eliminate those serogroups from infected flocks, but requires identification of serogroups present in infected flocks. Serogroups can be identified using slide agglutination or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods. The objectives of this project were to use stochastic simulation modeling to estimate the efficacy of sampling strategies encompassing 5-40 sheep per flock and 2-4 colonies per sheep, and to compare efficacies based on slide agglutination or multiplex PCR test results. Foot swabs collected from sheep in 12 flocks were used as the basis for a sampling strategy simulation model. None of the evaluated sampling strategies identified the two most common serogroups in the flock, or all serogroups present in the flock, in 95% of iterations. However, a simulated sample of 22 sheep/flock and 2 colonies/sheep resulted in a simulated vaccine that protected 95% of the sheep that could be protected by a single bivalent vaccine, while a sample of 24 sheep/flock and 2 colonies/sheep resulted in a series of simulated bivalent vaccines that protected 95% of diseased infected sheep. The difference in outcome was due to the distribution and frequency of serogroups within certain flocks where some serogroups were uncommon and others dominant. A sampling strategy (>40 sheep/flock, 4 colonies/sheep) that will identify the two most common serogroups in a flock 95% of the time may not be cost effective. Evaluating efficacy based on the expected effect on the flock may be more useful than one which seeks to determine the most common serogroups. These findings are broadly applicable to diseases where more than one strain or type of pathogen may be present and must be represented in a vaccine.

KW - Dichelobacter nodosus

KW - Footrot

KW - Monte Carlo simulation

KW - Sampling

KW - Sheep-microbiological diseases

KW - Vaccination

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77951095070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77951095070&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.02.011

DO - 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.02.011

M3 - Article

C2 - 20303191

AN - SCOPUS:77951095070

VL - 95

SP - 127

EP - 136

JO - Preventive Veterinary Medicine

JF - Preventive Veterinary Medicine

SN - 0167-5877

IS - 1-2

ER -