Diagnosis of male chlamydia trachomatis urethritis by polymerase chain reaction

H. C. Wiesenfeld, M. Uhrin, B. W. Dixon, Richard L Sweet

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

44 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background and Objectives: A quick and highly sensitive diagnostic test would be valuable in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis. Goal of this Study: We compared a new polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique to Chlamydiazyme (Abbott, North Chicago, IL) in the detection of male chlamydial urethritis, and evaluated the performance of PCR on urine samples. Study Design: Urethral samples for analysis by PCR and Chlamydiazyme were obtained from 474 unselected patients attending a sexually transmitted diseases (STD) clinic. Urine samples were analyzed by PCR from 362 of these patients. Results: Twenty seven (5.7%) urethral samples were positive by Chlamydiazyme, while 64 (13.5%) were positive by PCR. After resolution of discrepant results, the sensitivity of PCR on urethral swabs was 98.4% and the specificity was 99.0%, with positive and negative predictive values of 93.8% and 99.8%, respectively. These same measures for Chlamydiazyme were 43.5%, 100%, 100%, and 92.2%, respectively. The sensitivity of PCR on urine samples was 87.1%, the specificity was 98.0%, and the positive and negative predictive values were 90.0% and 97.4%, respectively. Conclusions: This PCR test is more sensitive than Chlamydiazyme in detecting male urethral chlamydial infections in an STD clinic population, and appears to be equally efficacious on urethral swabs and urine samples.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)268-271
Number of pages4
JournalSexually Transmitted Diseases
Volume21
Issue number5
StatePublished - 1994
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Urethritis
Chlamydia trachomatis
Polymerase Chain Reaction
Urine
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Routine Diagnostic Tests
Infection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology
  • Microbiology (medical)
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Diagnosis of male chlamydia trachomatis urethritis by polymerase chain reaction. / Wiesenfeld, H. C.; Uhrin, M.; Dixon, B. W.; Sweet, Richard L.

In: Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Vol. 21, No. 5, 1994, p. 268-271.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Wiesenfeld, H. C. ; Uhrin, M. ; Dixon, B. W. ; Sweet, Richard L. / Diagnosis of male chlamydia trachomatis urethritis by polymerase chain reaction. In: Sexually Transmitted Diseases. 1994 ; Vol. 21, No. 5. pp. 268-271.
@article{26421fb8df8d43e09f39118800a6246a,
title = "Diagnosis of male chlamydia trachomatis urethritis by polymerase chain reaction",
abstract = "Background and Objectives: A quick and highly sensitive diagnostic test would be valuable in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis. Goal of this Study: We compared a new polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique to Chlamydiazyme (Abbott, North Chicago, IL) in the detection of male chlamydial urethritis, and evaluated the performance of PCR on urine samples. Study Design: Urethral samples for analysis by PCR and Chlamydiazyme were obtained from 474 unselected patients attending a sexually transmitted diseases (STD) clinic. Urine samples were analyzed by PCR from 362 of these patients. Results: Twenty seven (5.7{\%}) urethral samples were positive by Chlamydiazyme, while 64 (13.5{\%}) were positive by PCR. After resolution of discrepant results, the sensitivity of PCR on urethral swabs was 98.4{\%} and the specificity was 99.0{\%}, with positive and negative predictive values of 93.8{\%} and 99.8{\%}, respectively. These same measures for Chlamydiazyme were 43.5{\%}, 100{\%}, 100{\%}, and 92.2{\%}, respectively. The sensitivity of PCR on urine samples was 87.1{\%}, the specificity was 98.0{\%}, and the positive and negative predictive values were 90.0{\%} and 97.4{\%}, respectively. Conclusions: This PCR test is more sensitive than Chlamydiazyme in detecting male urethral chlamydial infections in an STD clinic population, and appears to be equally efficacious on urethral swabs and urine samples.",
author = "Wiesenfeld, {H. C.} and M. Uhrin and Dixon, {B. W.} and Sweet, {Richard L}",
year = "1994",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "268--271",
journal = "Sexually Transmitted Diseases",
issn = "0148-5717",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Diagnosis of male chlamydia trachomatis urethritis by polymerase chain reaction

AU - Wiesenfeld, H. C.

AU - Uhrin, M.

AU - Dixon, B. W.

AU - Sweet, Richard L

PY - 1994

Y1 - 1994

N2 - Background and Objectives: A quick and highly sensitive diagnostic test would be valuable in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis. Goal of this Study: We compared a new polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique to Chlamydiazyme (Abbott, North Chicago, IL) in the detection of male chlamydial urethritis, and evaluated the performance of PCR on urine samples. Study Design: Urethral samples for analysis by PCR and Chlamydiazyme were obtained from 474 unselected patients attending a sexually transmitted diseases (STD) clinic. Urine samples were analyzed by PCR from 362 of these patients. Results: Twenty seven (5.7%) urethral samples were positive by Chlamydiazyme, while 64 (13.5%) were positive by PCR. After resolution of discrepant results, the sensitivity of PCR on urethral swabs was 98.4% and the specificity was 99.0%, with positive and negative predictive values of 93.8% and 99.8%, respectively. These same measures for Chlamydiazyme were 43.5%, 100%, 100%, and 92.2%, respectively. The sensitivity of PCR on urine samples was 87.1%, the specificity was 98.0%, and the positive and negative predictive values were 90.0% and 97.4%, respectively. Conclusions: This PCR test is more sensitive than Chlamydiazyme in detecting male urethral chlamydial infections in an STD clinic population, and appears to be equally efficacious on urethral swabs and urine samples.

AB - Background and Objectives: A quick and highly sensitive diagnostic test would be valuable in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis. Goal of this Study: We compared a new polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique to Chlamydiazyme (Abbott, North Chicago, IL) in the detection of male chlamydial urethritis, and evaluated the performance of PCR on urine samples. Study Design: Urethral samples for analysis by PCR and Chlamydiazyme were obtained from 474 unselected patients attending a sexually transmitted diseases (STD) clinic. Urine samples were analyzed by PCR from 362 of these patients. Results: Twenty seven (5.7%) urethral samples were positive by Chlamydiazyme, while 64 (13.5%) were positive by PCR. After resolution of discrepant results, the sensitivity of PCR on urethral swabs was 98.4% and the specificity was 99.0%, with positive and negative predictive values of 93.8% and 99.8%, respectively. These same measures for Chlamydiazyme were 43.5%, 100%, 100%, and 92.2%, respectively. The sensitivity of PCR on urine samples was 87.1%, the specificity was 98.0%, and the positive and negative predictive values were 90.0% and 97.4%, respectively. Conclusions: This PCR test is more sensitive than Chlamydiazyme in detecting male urethral chlamydial infections in an STD clinic population, and appears to be equally efficacious on urethral swabs and urine samples.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028091789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028091789&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 7817260

AN - SCOPUS:0028091789

VL - 21

SP - 268

EP - 271

JO - Sexually Transmitted Diseases

JF - Sexually Transmitted Diseases

SN - 0148-5717

IS - 5

ER -