Development of a novel ERCP mechanical simulator

Joseph Leung, John G. Lee, Micha Rojany, Robert Wilson, Felix W. Leung

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

25 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: There is a paucity of objective methods for evaluating trainee performance and comparing ERCP accessories. Objective: Use of a mechanical ERCP simulator to evaluate trainee performance and to compare ERCP accessories via procedure time. Design: Pilot study using a mechanical simulator. Setting: Hands-on ERCP practice workshops. Subjects: Endoscopists at various levels of ERCP experience. Method: Validation studies are described to show that the simulator permits participants with varying ERCP experience to demonstrate their skill levels and offers novel training applications in ERCP courses. The time required for completing a simulated stent placement procedure, simulated fluoroscopy time, and participant expectations were recorded in different settings. Participants' expectations were compared before and after training to determine whether the simulator was a credible adjunct to ERCP training. Results: Significantly shorter procedure times were recorded for the same accessories used by participants with more ERCP experience than those with less experience and for the same group of participants when using accessories with 1 design compared with another. The mean total credibility score showed a significant increase after simulator practice. Limitations: In vitro practice by using a mechanical simulator; results may not translate directly to the clinical setting. How the objective procedure times measured during practice can complement assessment of trainee competence or define usefulness of different accessories is unknown but deserves to be explored in future studies. Conclusions: The procedure times can categorize participants according to their ERCP experience and separate accessories according to their ease of use. An increase in credibility score validates participants' endorsement of such practice as a credible adjunct to ERCP training.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1056-1062
Number of pages7
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume65
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2007
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Validation Studies
Fluoroscopy
Mental Competency
Stents
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Leung, J., Lee, J. G., Rojany, M., Wilson, R., & Leung, F. W. (2007). Development of a novel ERCP mechanical simulator. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 65(7), 1056-1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.11.018

Development of a novel ERCP mechanical simulator. / Leung, Joseph; Lee, John G.; Rojany, Micha; Wilson, Robert; Leung, Felix W.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 65, No. 7, 06.2007, p. 1056-1062.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Leung, J, Lee, JG, Rojany, M, Wilson, R & Leung, FW 2007, 'Development of a novel ERCP mechanical simulator', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 1056-1062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2006.11.018
Leung, Joseph ; Lee, John G. ; Rojany, Micha ; Wilson, Robert ; Leung, Felix W. / Development of a novel ERCP mechanical simulator. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2007 ; Vol. 65, No. 7. pp. 1056-1062.
@article{fd3864bc358642e8a8a09df6ca685456,
title = "Development of a novel ERCP mechanical simulator",
abstract = "Background: There is a paucity of objective methods for evaluating trainee performance and comparing ERCP accessories. Objective: Use of a mechanical ERCP simulator to evaluate trainee performance and to compare ERCP accessories via procedure time. Design: Pilot study using a mechanical simulator. Setting: Hands-on ERCP practice workshops. Subjects: Endoscopists at various levels of ERCP experience. Method: Validation studies are described to show that the simulator permits participants with varying ERCP experience to demonstrate their skill levels and offers novel training applications in ERCP courses. The time required for completing a simulated stent placement procedure, simulated fluoroscopy time, and participant expectations were recorded in different settings. Participants' expectations were compared before and after training to determine whether the simulator was a credible adjunct to ERCP training. Results: Significantly shorter procedure times were recorded for the same accessories used by participants with more ERCP experience than those with less experience and for the same group of participants when using accessories with 1 design compared with another. The mean total credibility score showed a significant increase after simulator practice. Limitations: In vitro practice by using a mechanical simulator; results may not translate directly to the clinical setting. How the objective procedure times measured during practice can complement assessment of trainee competence or define usefulness of different accessories is unknown but deserves to be explored in future studies. Conclusions: The procedure times can categorize participants according to their ERCP experience and separate accessories according to their ease of use. An increase in credibility score validates participants' endorsement of such practice as a credible adjunct to ERCP training.",
author = "Joseph Leung and Lee, {John G.} and Micha Rojany and Robert Wilson and Leung, {Felix W.}",
year = "2007",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.gie.2006.11.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "65",
pages = "1056--1062",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development of a novel ERCP mechanical simulator

AU - Leung, Joseph

AU - Lee, John G.

AU - Rojany, Micha

AU - Wilson, Robert

AU - Leung, Felix W.

PY - 2007/6

Y1 - 2007/6

N2 - Background: There is a paucity of objective methods for evaluating trainee performance and comparing ERCP accessories. Objective: Use of a mechanical ERCP simulator to evaluate trainee performance and to compare ERCP accessories via procedure time. Design: Pilot study using a mechanical simulator. Setting: Hands-on ERCP practice workshops. Subjects: Endoscopists at various levels of ERCP experience. Method: Validation studies are described to show that the simulator permits participants with varying ERCP experience to demonstrate their skill levels and offers novel training applications in ERCP courses. The time required for completing a simulated stent placement procedure, simulated fluoroscopy time, and participant expectations were recorded in different settings. Participants' expectations were compared before and after training to determine whether the simulator was a credible adjunct to ERCP training. Results: Significantly shorter procedure times were recorded for the same accessories used by participants with more ERCP experience than those with less experience and for the same group of participants when using accessories with 1 design compared with another. The mean total credibility score showed a significant increase after simulator practice. Limitations: In vitro practice by using a mechanical simulator; results may not translate directly to the clinical setting. How the objective procedure times measured during practice can complement assessment of trainee competence or define usefulness of different accessories is unknown but deserves to be explored in future studies. Conclusions: The procedure times can categorize participants according to their ERCP experience and separate accessories according to their ease of use. An increase in credibility score validates participants' endorsement of such practice as a credible adjunct to ERCP training.

AB - Background: There is a paucity of objective methods for evaluating trainee performance and comparing ERCP accessories. Objective: Use of a mechanical ERCP simulator to evaluate trainee performance and to compare ERCP accessories via procedure time. Design: Pilot study using a mechanical simulator. Setting: Hands-on ERCP practice workshops. Subjects: Endoscopists at various levels of ERCP experience. Method: Validation studies are described to show that the simulator permits participants with varying ERCP experience to demonstrate their skill levels and offers novel training applications in ERCP courses. The time required for completing a simulated stent placement procedure, simulated fluoroscopy time, and participant expectations were recorded in different settings. Participants' expectations were compared before and after training to determine whether the simulator was a credible adjunct to ERCP training. Results: Significantly shorter procedure times were recorded for the same accessories used by participants with more ERCP experience than those with less experience and for the same group of participants when using accessories with 1 design compared with another. The mean total credibility score showed a significant increase after simulator practice. Limitations: In vitro practice by using a mechanical simulator; results may not translate directly to the clinical setting. How the objective procedure times measured during practice can complement assessment of trainee competence or define usefulness of different accessories is unknown but deserves to be explored in future studies. Conclusions: The procedure times can categorize participants according to their ERCP experience and separate accessories according to their ease of use. An increase in credibility score validates participants' endorsement of such practice as a credible adjunct to ERCP training.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34249045689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=34249045689&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gie.2006.11.018

DO - 10.1016/j.gie.2006.11.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 17531642

AN - SCOPUS:34249045689

VL - 65

SP - 1056

EP - 1062

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 7

ER -